Paper · 2024 · Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science

Evaluation of Variable Rates of Zinc Sulfate Fertilization on Soil Chemical Characteristics, Fertility Status, and Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum): A Case Study on the Hilly Region of Uthal, Balochistan

Khalid Hameed Mengal; Shahmir Ali Kalhoro; Muneer Ahmed Rodeni; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fertilization of field crops with zinc (Zn) has recently been a significant consideration worldwide due to deficiency and malnutrition. This research study aimed to evaluate the impact of different levels of zinc sulfate, combined with nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizers on soil properties, morphological characteristics of plants, plant growth, yield attributes, and their interaction with soil properties. The research experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with Six variable rates of ZnSO-4 (0, 4.5, 9.5, 14.5, 19.5, and 24.5 kgha-1) arranged in a triplicate. The analysis results showed a 15-20% significant effect of increased rate of Zn fertilization on plant growth (plant height, leaf length, spike length, and fertile tiller formation), biological and grain yield of wheat compared to control. The mean maximum of biological (18018.33±820.63 and 17219.66±1261.41 kgha-1) and grain yield (4233.33±121.027 and 4000±58.13 kgha-1) were observed in T5 and T4 (ZnSO-4 rate 24.5 and 19.5 kgha-1) compared to control (8675.66±228.92 and 2863.33±46.99 kgha-1). Additionally; the results of the co-relation matrix showed a positive significant (p<0.05) effect among the various soil and plant parameters, while; the negative significant (p<0.05) was observed in soil pH, and non-significant (p<0.05) was observed in soil EC (dsm-1). Conclusively; this study's findings suggested that ZnSO-4 at the rate of 24.5 kgha-1 could improve the interaction among the soil and plant nutrition that enhanced the morphological characteristic of wheat and ultimately influenced biological and grain yield kgha-1 of wheat in the hilly areas of Balochistan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher zinc fertilization significantly increased wheat growth and yield by 15-20% compared with control.

Treatment
increased rate of Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
plant growth (plant height, leaf length, spike length, and fertile tiller formation), biological and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15-20%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 15-20% significant effect of increased rate of Zn fertilization on plant growth (plant height, leaf length, spike length, and fertile tiller formation), biological and grain yield of wheat compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 had a mean maximum biological yield of 18018.33±820.63 kgha-1.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
biologicale0
Direction
maximume0
Value
18018.33±820.63e0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean maximum of biological (18018.33±820.63 and 17219.66±1261.41 kgha-1) and grain yield (4233.33±121.027 and 4000±58.13 kgha-1) were observed in T5 and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had biological yield of 17219.66±1261.41 kgha-1.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
biologicale0
Value
17219.66±1261.41 kgha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological (18018.33±820.63 and 17219.66±1261.41 kgha-1) and grain yield (4233.33±121.027 and 4000±58.13 kgha-1) were observed in T5 and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 had grain yield of 4233.33±121.027 kgha-1.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
4233.33±121.027e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4233.33±121.027 and 4000±58.13 kgha-1) were observed in T5 and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had grain yield of 4000±58.13 kgha-1.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
4000±58.13 kgha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4233.33±121.027 and 4000±58.13 kgha-1) were observed in T5 and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and plant parameters were positively correlated.

Outcome
plant parameterse0
Direction
positivee0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the co-relation matrix showed a positive significant (p<0.05) effect among the various soil and plant parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH had a negative significant association.

Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
negativee0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the negative significant (p<0.05) was observed in soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil EC had a nonsignificant association.

Outcome
soil ECe0
Setting
soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-significant (p<0.05) was observed in soil EC (dsm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 24.5 kgha-1 ZnSO-4 for improving wheat nutrition, morphology and yields in hilly Balochistan.

Treatment
ZnSO-4 at the rate of 24.5 kgha-1e0
Outcome
biological and grain yielde0
Direction
improvee0
Setting
hilly areas of Balochistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnSO-4 at the rate of 24.5 kgha-1 could improve the interaction among the soil and plant nutrition that enhanced the morphological characteristic of wheat and ultimately influenced biological and grain yield kgha-1 of wheat in the hilly areas of Balochistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–161 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.