Paper · 2024 · Plants

PGPB Isolated from Drought-Tolerant Plants Help Wheat Plants to Overcome Osmotic Stress

Veronika N. Pishchik; Elena P. Chizhevskaya; Vladimir K. Chebotar; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this research was to study the effect of plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) isolated from the drought-tolerant plants camel thorn (Alhagi pseudoalhagi (M.Bieb.) Fisch) and white pigweed (Chenopodium album L.) on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants cv. Lenigradskaya 6, growing under hydroponic conditions and osmotic stress (generated by 12% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG)). Based on the assumption that plants create a unique microbiome that helps them overcome various stresses, we hypothesized that bacteria isolated from drought-tolerant plants may assist cultivated wheat plants in coping with drought stress. PGPB were isolated from seeds and leaves of plants and identified as Bacillus spp. (strains Cap 07D, Cap 09D, and App 11D); Paenibacillus sp. (Cap 286); and Arthrobacter sp. (Cap 03D). All bacteria produced different phytohormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellic acid (GAS3) and were capable of stimulating wheat growth under normal and osmotic stress conditions. All PGPB reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, increased the total chlorophyll content by increasing chlorophyll a, and modulated wheat hormone homeostasis and CAT and POX activities under osmotic conditions. Selected strains can be promising candidates for the mitigating of the drought stress of wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolated bacteria produced IAA, ABA and GAS3.

Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
phytohormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellic acid (GAS3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All bacteria produced different phytohormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellic acid (GAS3) and were capable of stimulating wheat growth under normal and osmotic stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolated bacteria stimulated wheat growth under normal and osmotic stress conditions.

Treatment
bacteriae0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
stimulatinge0
Qualifier
normal and osmotic stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All bacteria produced different phytohormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellic acid (GAS3) and were capable of stimulating wheat growth under normal and osmotic stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) content under osmotic conditions.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
under osmotic conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All PGPB reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, increased the total chlorophyll content by increasing chlorophyll a, and modulated wheat hormone homeostasis and CAT and POX activities under osmotic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB increased total chlorophyll content under osmotic conditions.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under osmotic conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All PGPB reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, increased the total chlorophyll content by increasing chlorophyll a, and modulated wheat hormone homeostasis and CAT and POX activities under osmotic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB increasing chlorophyll a under osmotic conditions.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
under osmotic conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All PGPB reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, increased the total chlorophyll content by increasing chlorophyll a, and modulated wheat hormone homeostasis and CAT and POX activities under osmotic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB modulated wheat hormone homeostasis under osmotic conditions.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
wheat hormone homeostasise0
Qualifier
under osmotic conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All PGPB reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, increased the total chlorophyll content by increasing chlorophyll a, and modulated wheat hormone homeostasis and CAT and POX activities under osmotic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB modulated CAT and POX activities under osmotic conditions.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
CAT and POX activitiese0
Qualifier
under osmotic conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All PGPB reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, increased the total chlorophyll content by increasing chlorophyll a, and modulated wheat hormone homeostasis and CAT and POX activities under osmotic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1246 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose selected strains as candidates to mitigate wheat drought stress.

Treatment
Selected strainse0
Outcome
mitigating of the drought stress of wheat plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selected strains can be promising candidates for the mitigating of the drought stress of wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1349 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Bacteria · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 76 positive, 6 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.