Paper · 2023 · Agrarian Bulletin of the North Caucasus

THE INFLUENCE OF BIOLOGICS AND MICRONUTRIENTS AS AN ELEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF WINTER WHEAT

Elena Drepa; Roman Pshenichny; Olga Mukhina; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The research was carried out in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of biological preparations and micronutrients both separately and when used together to form the quality of winter wheat grain in the conditions of an unstable humidification zone of the Stavropol Territory. The work was carried out in 2020–2022 in the fields of the experimental station of the Stavropol State Agrarian University on leached chernozem. The experience is two-factor, the repetition is three-fold. The experience scheme includes 10 options. An economic option was adopted as a control. In the experiment, biological preparations and micronutrients were studied both independently and when used together (factor A). The studied biological preparations and micronutrients were used during seed pickling and on vegetating plants during spring tillering and flag leaf formation (factor B). The largest area of the leaf surface was obtained by the combined use of micronutrients and biologics in the phase of formation of the flag leaf. The difference with the control was 13.0 thousand m2/ha (7.5 %), with respect to the independent use of micronutrients, the difference was 13.0 thousand m2/ha (3.6 %). With the independent use of biopreparations, there are differences in the phase of formation of the flag sheet. The applied preparations, when used together, provide an increase in yield by 0.53 t/ha. The greatest increase in yield of 0.75 t/ha is provided by the application of the Standard program + VL-77 + Oracle Seeds etching + Maximum programs + VL-77 + Oracle Multicomplex in the tillering phase in spring + Pseudobacterin-3 + Biodux + VL- 77 + Oracle Sulfur Active on the flag sheet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined micronutrients and biologics gave the largest leaf area at flag leaf formation, 13.0 thousand m2/ha above control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Treatment
combined use of micronutrients and biologicse0
Outcome
area of the leaf surfacee0
Direction
largeste0
Value
13.0 thousand m2/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest area of the leaf surface was obtained by the combined use of micronutrients and biologics in the phase of formation of the flag leaf. The difference with the control was 13.0 thousand m2/ha (7.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined micronutrients and biologics gave leaf area 13.0 thousand m2/ha greater than micronutrients alone.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined use of micronutrients and biologicse1
Outcome
area of the leaf surfacee1
Direction
differencee0
Value
13.0 thousand m2/hae0
Comparator
independent use of micronutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with respect to the independent use of micronutrients, the difference was 13.0 thousand m2/ha (3.6 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“The largest area of the leaf surface was obtained by the combined use of micronutrients and biologics in the phase of formation of the flag leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint application of the preparations increased wheat yield by 0.53 t/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
applied preparations, when used togethere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.53 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied preparations, when used together, provide an increase in yield by 0.53 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated multistage preparation program produced the greatest yield increase, 0.75 t/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Standard program + VL-77 + Oracle Seeds etching + Maximum programs + VL-77 + Oracle Multicomplex in the tillering phase in spring + Pseudobacterin-3 + Biodux + VL- 77 + Oracle Sulfur Active on the flag sheete0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.75 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest increase in yield of 0.75 t/ha is provided by the application of the Standard program + VL-77 + Oracle Seeds etching + Maximum programs + VL-77 + Oracle Multicomplex in the tillering phase in spring + Pseudobacterin-3 + Biodux + VL- 77 + Oracle Sulfur Active on the flag sheet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1685 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.