Paper · 2024 · Plant Nano Biology

Leveraging nano silica and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolated from Gangetic riparian zone to Combat Pendimethalin Toxicity in Brassica juncea

Samarth Sharma; Samarth Sharma; Sneha Tripathi; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore novel plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolated from Gangetic riparian zones and investigates their role in enhancing the resilience of Brassica juncea to pendimethalin toxicity using SiNPs (Silicon nanoparticles). The isolated PGPR was characterized by 16sRNA and its phylogenetic analysis revealed it as Bacillus pulumis. Isolate was examined for its plant growth promotion potential and stress alleviating capabilities. SiNP was utilized as a potential amendment to enhance these effects. Bacillus pulumis showed IAA production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilisation and siderophore production attributes. Fluorescence microscopy conducted in vivo confirmed the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as supported by elevated MDA concentration and reduced membrane permeability. Exposure of Brassica juncea seedlings to 5 μM pendimethalin led to a marked increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), with superoxide radicals (SOR) rising by 125.58 % and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) by 159.32 % in roots, compared to the control. The combined application of PGPR and SiNP significantly mitigated this stress, reducing SOR and H₂O₂ levels to 27.91 % and 35.59 % respectively. This reduction is linked to enhanced antioxidant defence mechanisms, as the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) increased by 22.76 % and 28.38 %, respectively, in root of seedlings co-treated with SiNP and PGPR. Pendimethalin alone reduced dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR) activity in roots by 28.95 % and 42.11 %, respectively. However, individual supplementation of SiNP and PGPR mitigated this suppression, with drop in DHAR activity reduced to only 12.63 % and 11.58 %, and MDAR by 17.54 % and 22.81 %, respectively. Co-application of SiNP and PGPR further alleviated this inhibition, limiting DHAR reduction to 9.47 % and MDAR to 3.51 %. This suggests that pendimethalin toxicity causes oxidative stress through disruption of redox balance and over production of ROS and the combined action of SiNP and PGPR enhances the antioxidant system, which likely explains the synergistic effect in alleviating pendimethalin-induced toxicity. The co-application of PGPR and SiNP significantly enhanced plant growth parameters, increased photosynthetic pigment content, improved membrane stability, and reduced lipid peroxidation in both leaves and roots. This research underscores the potential of PGPR and SiNP in sustainable agriculture, particularly in mitigating herbicide-induced stress in crop plants. • Rhizospheric bacteria isolated from gangetic riparian zone showed PGP activity. • Bacillus pumilus demonstrated the best activity among PGPR. • Growth parameters of Brassica juncea declined due to exposure to Pendimethalin stress. • SiNP and PGPR reduced ROS accumulation and upregulated antioxidant gene expression. • SiNP and PGPR synergy exhibited higher stress mitigation potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizobacterial isolate was identified as Bacillus pulumis.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Interactor
Bacillus pulumise0symbiont
Outcome
Bacillus pulumise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its phylogenetic analysis revealed it as Bacillus pulumis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pulumis showed IAA production, ACC deaminase activity and phosphate solubilisation.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Interactor
Bacillus pulumise0symbiont
Outcome
IAA production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilisatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus pulumis showed IAA production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilisation and siderophore production attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pulumis showed siderophore production.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Interactor
Bacillus pulumise0symbiont
Outcome
siderophore productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus pulumis showed IAA production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilisation and siderophore production attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin raised root superoxide radicals by 125.58% against control.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
5 μM pendimethaline0
Outcome
superoxide radicals (SOR)e0
Direction
risinge0
Value
125.58 %e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of Brassica juncea seedlings to 5 μM pendimethalin led to a marked increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), with superoxide radicals (SOR) rising by 125.58 % and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) by 159.32 % in roots, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin raised root hydrogen peroxide by 159.32% against control.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
5 μM pendimethaline0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)e0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
159.32 %e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of Brassica juncea seedlings to 5 μM pendimethalin led to a marked increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), with superoxide radicals (SOR) rising by 125.58 % and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) by 159.32 % in roots, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR plus SiNP reduced SOR to 27.91%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae1
Treatment
combined application of PGPR and SiNPe0
Interactor
PGPRe2symbiont
Outcome
SORe0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
27.91 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of PGPR and SiNP significantly mitigated this stress, reducing SOR and H₂O₂ levels to 27.91 % and 35.59 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica juncea seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR plus SiNP reduced H₂O₂ to 35.59%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae1
Treatment
combined application of PGPR and SiNPe0
Interactor
PGPRe2symbiont
Outcome
H₂O₂e0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
35.59 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of PGPR and SiNP significantly mitigated this stress, reducing SOR and H₂O₂ levels to 27.91 % and 35.59 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica juncea seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-treatment increased root SOD activity by 22.76%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
co-treated with SiNP and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.76 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) increased by 22.76 % and 28.38 %, respectively, in root of seedlings co-treated with SiNP and PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-treatment increased root CAT activity by 28.38%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
co-treated with SiNP and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.38 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) increased by 22.76 % and 28.38 %, respectively, in root of seedlings co-treated with SiNP and PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin reduced root DHAR activity by 28.95%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Pendimethalin alonee0
Outcome
dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
28.95 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin alone reduced dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR) activity in roots by 28.95 % and 42.11 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin reduced root MDAR activity by 42.11%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Pendimethalin alonee0
Outcome
monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
42.11 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin alone reduced dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR) activity in roots by 28.95 % and 42.11 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiNP supplementation limited the DHAR activity drop to 12.63%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
SiNPe0
Outcome
DHAR activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
12.63 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual supplementation of SiNP and PGPR mitigated this suppression, with drop in DHAR activity reduced to only 12.63 % and 11.58 %, and MDAR by 17.54 % and 22.81 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR supplementation limited the DHAR activity drop to 11.58%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
DHAR activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11.58 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual supplementation of SiNP and PGPR mitigated this suppression, with drop in DHAR activity reduced to only 12.63 % and 11.58 %, and MDAR by 17.54 % and 22.81 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiNP supplementation limited the MDAR activity drop to 17.54%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
SiNPe0
Outcome
MDARe0
Direction
mitigatede0
Value
17.54 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual supplementation of SiNP and PGPR mitigated this suppression, with drop in DHAR activity reduced to only 12.63 % and 11.58 %, and MDAR by 17.54 % and 22.81 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR supplementation limited the MDAR activity drop to 22.81%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
MDARe0
Direction
mitigatede0
Value
22.81 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual supplementation of SiNP and PGPR mitigated this suppression, with drop in DHAR activity reduced to only 12.63 % and 11.58 %, and MDAR by 17.54 % and 22.81 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application limited the DHAR decline to 9.47%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Co-application of SiNP and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
DHAR reductione0
Direction
limitinge0
Value
9.47 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-application of SiNP and PGPR further alleviated this inhibition, limiting DHAR reduction to 9.47 % and MDAR to 3.51 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application limited the MDAR decline to 3.51%.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Co-application of SiNP and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
MDARe0
Direction
limitinge0
Value
3.51 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-application of SiNP and PGPR further alleviated this inhibition, limiting DHAR reduction to 9.47 % and MDAR to 3.51 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application improved plant growth, pigment content and membrane stability.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
co-application of PGPR and SiNPe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth parameters, increased photosynthetic pigment content, improved membrane stabilitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The co-application of PGPR and SiNP significantly enhanced plant growth parameters, increased photosynthetic pigment content, improved membrane stability, and reduced lipid peroxidation in both leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application reduced lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
co-application of PGPR and SiNPe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The co-application of PGPR and SiNP significantly enhanced plant growth parameters, increased photosynthetic pigment content, improved membrane stability, and reduced lipid peroxidation in both leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiNP and PGPR upregulated antioxidant gene expression.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
SiNP and PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
antioxidant gene expressione0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiNP and PGPR reduced ROS accumulation and upregulated antioxidant gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2843–2925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.