Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield attributes and yield of forage sorghum under North Gujarat agro-climatic conditions

Tejasvi V Joshi; DM Patel; Kinjal Chaudhary; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2022 and 2023 at Agronomy Instructional Farm, C. P. College of Agriculture, S. D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on yield attributes and yield of forage sorghum under North Gujarat Agro-climatic conditions. The experiment was consist of nine treatment combinations of three organic manures, viz., no manure, FYM @ 10.0 t /ha, castor cake @ 1.0 t /ha and three fertility levels, 100% RDF, 75% RDF and 50% RDF in split plot design with four replications. Among sources of organic manures applied to forage sorghum, castor cake @ 1.0 t/ha proved significantly superior with respect to yield attributes such as plant height, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS as well as green and dry forage yields, which was followed by application of FYM @ 10 t/ha. Application of 100% RDF to forage sorghum remarkably improved yield attributes viz., plant height, leaf length, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem ratio, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS; yields viz., green and dry forage compared to 50% RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor cake significantly improved forage sorghum growth attributes relative to other organic manures.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
castor cake @ 1.0 t/hae0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area per plant, leaf: steme0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
FYM @ 10 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Among sources of organic manures applied to forage sorghum, castor cake @ 1.0 t/ha proved significantly superior with respect to yield attributes such as plant height, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS as well as green and dry forage yields, which was followed by application of FYM @ 10 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor cake significantly improved additional forage sorghum growth attributes relative to FYM.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
castor cake @ 1.0 t/hae0
Outcome
stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
FYM @ 10 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Among sources of organic manures applied to forage sorghum, castor cake @ 1.0 t/ha proved significantly superior with respect to yield attributes such as plant height, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS as well as green and dry forage yields, which was followed by application of FYM @ 10 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor cake significantly improved forage sorghum growth rates relative to FYM.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
castor cake @ 1.0 t/hae0
Outcome
RGR and CGRe0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
between 0-30 and 30-60 DASe0
Comparator
FYM @ 10 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Among sources of organic manures applied to forage sorghum, castor cake @ 1.0 t/ha proved significantly superior with respect to yield attributes such as plant height, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS as well as green and dry forage yields, which was followed by application of FYM @ 10 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor cake significantly improved green and dry forage yields relative to FYM.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
castor cake @ 1.0 t/hae0
Outcome
green and dry forage yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
FYM @ 10 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Among sources of organic manures applied to forage sorghum, castor cake @ 1.0 t/ha proved significantly superior with respect to yield attributes such as plant height, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS as well as green and dry forage yields, which was followed by application of FYM @ 10 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer improved sorghum plant height, leaf length and leaf area versus half rate.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
plant height, leaf length, leaf area per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF to forage sorghum remarkably improved yield attributes viz., plant height, leaf length, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem ratio, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS; yields viz., green and dry forage compared to 50% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer improved leaf:stem ratio, stem girth and internode length versus half rate.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
leaf: stem ratio, stem girth, length of internodee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF to forage sorghum remarkably improved yield attributes viz., plant height, leaf length, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem ratio, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS; yields viz., green and dry forage compared to 50% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer improved dry matter accumulation and growth rates versus half rate.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGRe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF to forage sorghum remarkably improved yield attributes viz., plant height, leaf length, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem ratio, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS; yields viz., green and dry forage compared to 50% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer improved green and dry forage yields versus half rate.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
green and dry foragee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF to forage sorghum remarkably improved yield attributes viz., plant height, leaf length, leaf area per plant, leaf: stem ratio, stem girth, length of internode, dry matter accumulation, RGR and CGR between 0-30 and 30-60 DAS; yields viz., green and dry forage compared to 50% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1278 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ

120 papers: 104 positive, 16 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.