Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Mycorrhizal extraradical mycelium can reduce cadmium uptake by maize and cadmium leaching from contaminated soil: based on an in-growth core experiment

Yijie Yang; Yang Li; Xiaoyi Li; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are commonly found in heavy metal-contaminated environments and form extraradical mycelium (ERM), but knowledge of their ecological functions is limited. In the present study, a soil column was filled with sterilized cadmium (Cd)-contaminated soil and contained an in-growth core for AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth. The in-growth core was static to maintain or rotated to disrupt ERM growth. Compared with the static treatment, the rotation treatment caused significant decreases in the content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP), the photosynthetic physiology of leaves, and maize growth, while increasing the Cd content in shoots and roots by 64 and 82%, respectively; additionally, the rotation treatment resulted in increases in the Cd concentration of the soil solution inside and outside the growth core by 30–38 and 17–52%, respectively, and Cd leaching loss by 29–39%. Moreover, the rotation treatment significantly altered the Cd forms in the soil solution and leachate, increasing the proportion of free Cd 2+ by 0.8–2.1% and decreasing the proportions of CdSO 4 (aq) and CdOH + by 6.1–56.1% and 26.1–48.7%, respectively. The structural equation model indicated that AMF directly and indirectly reduced maize Cd uptake and Cd leaching loss by decreasing Cd availability in the soil and soil solution through the GRSP secreted by ERM. Thus, AMF plays a crucial role in inhibiting Cd migration in soil through mycelial exudates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation decreased glomalin-related soil protein relative to static cores.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP)e0
Direction
decreasese0
Comparator
static treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the static treatment, the rotation treatment caused significant decreases in the content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–575 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation decreased maize leaf photosynthetic physiology relative to static cores.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic physiology of leavese0
Direction
decreasese0
Comparator
static treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the static treatment, the rotation treatment caused significant decreases in the content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP), the photosynthetic physiology of leaves, and maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation decreased maize growth relative to static cores.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
maize growthe0
Direction
decreasese0
Comparator
static treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the static treatment, the rotation treatment caused significant decreases in the content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP), the photosynthetic physiology of leaves, and maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation increased maize shoot cadmium content by 64%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
Cd content in shootse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
64e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rotation treatment caused significant decreases in the content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP), the photosynthetic physiology of leaves, and maize growth, while increasing the Cd content in shoots and roots by 64 and 82%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation increased maize root cadmium content by 82%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
Cd content in shoots and rootse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rotation treatment caused significant decreases in the content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP), the photosynthetic physiology of leaves, and maize growth, while increasing the Cd content in shoots and roots by 64 and 82%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation increased Cd concentration of soil solution inside the core by 30–38%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
Cd concentration of the soil solution insidee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
30–38e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rotation treatment resulted in increases in the Cd concentration of the soil solution inside and outside the growth core by 30–38 and 17–52%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation increased Cd concentration of soil solution outside the core by 17–52%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
Cd concentration of the soil solution inside and outside the growth coree0
Direction
increasese0
Value
17–52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rotation treatment resulted in increases in the Cd concentration of the soil solution inside and outside the growth core by 30–38 and 17–52%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation increased cadmium leaching loss by 29–39%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
rotation treatmente1
Outcome
Cd leaching losse0
Direction
increasese1
Value
29–39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd leaching loss by 29–39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–921 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rotation treatment resulted in increases in the Cd concentration of the soil solution inside and outside the growth core by 30–38 and 17–52%, respectively, and Cd leaching loss by 29–39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–921 · show in text ↑
e2

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation increased the proportion of free Cd 2+ by 0.8–2.1%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotation treatmente0
Outcome
proportion of free Cd 2+e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
0.8–2.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rotation treatment significantly altered the Cd forms in the soil solution and leachate, increasing the proportion of free Cd 2+ by 0.8–2.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation decreased CdSO 4 (aq) proportion by 6.1–56.1%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
rotation treatmente1
Outcome
proportions of CdSO 4 (aq)e0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
6.1–56.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the proportions of CdSO 4 (aq) and CdOH + by 6.1–56.1% and 26.1–48.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rotation treatment significantly altered the Cd forms in the soil solution and leachate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Core rotation decreased CdOH + proportion by 26.1–48.7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
rotation treatmente1
Outcome
proportions of CdSO 4 (aq) and CdOH +e0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
26.1–48.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the proportions of CdSO 4 (aq) and CdOH + by 6.1–56.1% and 26.1–48.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rotation treatment significantly altered the Cd forms in the soil solution and leachate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“AMF-inoculated maize seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model indicated AMF reduced maize Cd uptake through GRSP-mediated lower Cd availability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
maize Cd uptakee0
Qualifier
decreasing Cd availability in the soil and soil solution through the GRSP secreted by ERMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The structural equation model indicated that AMF directly and indirectly reduced maize Cd uptake and Cd leaching loss by decreasing Cd availability in the soil and soil solution through the GRSP secreted by ERM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1388 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model indicated AMF reduced Cd leaching loss through GRSP-mediated lower Cd availability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Cd leaching losse0
Qualifier
decreasing Cd availability in the soil and soil solution through the GRSP secreted by ERMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The structural equation model indicated that AMF directly and indirectly reduced maize Cd uptake and Cd leaching loss by decreasing Cd availability in the soil and soil solution through the GRSP secreted by ERM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1388 · show in text ↑

rotation · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

rotation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

rotation · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

rotation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 35 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

rotation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.