Paper · 2024 · Journal of Central European Green Innovation

The Effect of Plant Conditioners on Some Physiological Parameters of Maize in a Drought Year

Réka Láposi; Szilárd Zsolt Tóth; Ildikó Bélteki; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

At Kompolt, since 2015 we have been testing environmentally friendly nutrient supply methods for arable crops. The utilisation of the nutrients depends on the amount and distribution of rainfall during the growing season. In 2022, there was an extreme drought in Hungary, with rainfall from May to September 60-80% below the 40-year average, which resulted in failures of maize yield in many parts of the country. In the given year, we set up experiments with 3 different plant conditioners (1. amino acids, 2. P+Zn+K+Mo, 3. ion Zn) on maize cultivars and measured some photosynthetic parameters with different plant sensors, moreover the yield and corncob parameters at harvest. The SPAD index and spectral vegetation indices, which determine some physiological features, showed a positive effect of all three treatments at the beginning of flowering. Yield were 155 and 159% higher in the first two treatments and 144% higher in treatment 3 compared to the control. Based on corncob parameters, all three treatments showed significantly better results than the control. The largest difference was measured for treatment 2, based on all parameters tested, where foliar fertilizers supplemented with macro- and micro elements in addition to amino acids. Overall, plant conditioners applied at the right time can reduce the effects of environmental stress on plants, and the sensors used can monitor the effects of treatments throughout the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three plant conditioners positively affected maize SPAD and spectral vegetation indices at the beginning of flowering.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
beginning of floweringe0
Treatment
all three treatmentse0
Outcome
SPAD index and spectral vegetation indicese0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SPAD index and spectral vegetation indices, which determine some physiological features, showed a positive effect of all three treatments at the beginning of flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acids raised maize yield by 155% compared with the control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
amino acidse0
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
155e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1. amino acids, 2. P+Zn+K+Mo, 3. ion Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield were 155 and 159% higher in the first two treatments and 144% higher in treatment 3 compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P+Zn+K+Mo raised maize yield by 159% compared with the control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
P+Zn+K+Moe0
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
159%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1. amino acids, 2. P+Zn+K+Mo, 3. ion Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield were 155 and 159% higher in the first two treatments and 144% higher in treatment 3 compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ion Zn raised maize yield by 144% compared with the control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ion Zne0
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
144%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1. amino acids, 2. P+Zn+K+Mo, 3. ion Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield were 155 and 159% higher in the first two treatments and 144% higher in treatment 3 compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each of the three conditioners significantly improved maize corncob parameters relative to the control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
all three treatmentse0
Outcome
corncob parameterse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on corncob parameters, all three treatments showed significantly better results than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 2 produced the largest difference across measured parameters.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treatment 2e0
Outcome
all parameters testede0
Direction
largest differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest difference was measured for treatment 2, based on all parameters tested, where foliar fertilizers supplemented with macro- and micro elements in addition to amino acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that timely plant conditioners can reduce environmental stress effects on plants.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
plant conditioners applied at the right time can reduce the effects of environmental stress on plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant conditioners applied at the right time can reduce the effects of environmental stress on plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that sensors can monitor treatment effects throughout the growing season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
monitor the effects of treatments throughout the growing seasone0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sensors used can monitor the effects of treatments throughout the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.