Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Light interception, growth and yield of compact cotton as influenced by planting geometry, fertilizer levels and growth retardants under high density planting system

Mohan Chavan; Satyanarayana Rao; Raja .

17
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, UAS, Raichur during 2016-17 and 2017-8 to know the effect of planting geometry, fertilizer levels along with growth retardant spray on light interception, growth and yield of cotton grown under HDPS. The experiment was laid out in split plot design consisting of three levels of planting geometries viz., S1: 60 cm x 10 cm (1,66,666 plants ha-1), S2: 75 cm x 10 cm (1,33,333 plants ha-1) and S3: 90 cm x 10 cm (1,11,111 plants ha-1) in main plots and six levels of fertilizers and growth retardants viz., M1: 60:30:30 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1, M2: 80:40:40 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1, M3: 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1, M4: M1 + mepiqnat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS, M5: M2 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS and M6: M3 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS in sub plots. The result revealed that the closer row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm recorded significantly higher light interception ratio (48.10, 55.46 and 77.83% plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis) while wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm recorded significantly lower light interception ratio (40.08, 48.22 and 70.60% plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis). Closer row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm produced significantly higher seed cotton yield (2875 kg ha-1) over other planting geometries. Whereas, the growth attributes viz., number of sympodial branches per plant, total dry matter production per plant and absolute growth rate (13.82, 140.14 g and 1.81 g plant-1 day-1, respectively on pooled basis) and yield attributes viz., number of bolls per plant and boll weight (12.74 and 3.68 g, respectively on pooled basis) were significantly higher at a wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm. Among different fertilizer levels, light interception ratio was significantly higher with the application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 ( 47.40, 58.76 and 82.04% plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis) and significantly lower was observed with the application of 60:30:30 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiqnat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS (44.15 and 65.74% plant-1 at 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis). Application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS recoded significantly higher seed cotton yield (2915 kg ha-1). Further, the same treatment recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributing characters. Lower seed cotton yield was recorded with the application of 60:30:30 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 (2392 kg ha-1). Among the different treatment combinations, a treatment combination of closer spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of higher fertilizer dose of 100:50:50 N, P2O5 and K2O kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher light interception ratio of 50.53, 61.69 and 85.02 per cent plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis. Interaction of a row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS recoded significantly higher seed cotton yield (3178 kg ha-1) followed by combination of a row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of 80:40:40 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS (3031 kg ha-1). While, growth and yield attributing characters were higher under the combination of a row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm along with application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing increased cotton light interception at 60, 90, and 120 DAS.

Treatment
60 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
light interception ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.10, 55.46 and 77.83% plant-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“closer row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm recorded significantly higher light interception ratio (48.10, 55.46 and 77.83% plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing had lower cotton light interception at 60, 90, and 120 DAS.

Treatment
90 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
light interception ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
40.08, 48.22 and 70.60% plant-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm recorded significantly lower light interception ratio (40.08, 48.22 and 70.60% plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seed yield was higher at 60 cm by 10 cm than at other spacings.

Treatment
60 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2875 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other planting geometriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm produced significantly higher seed cotton yield (2875 kg ha-1) over other planting geometries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing increased cotton sympodial branches per plant.

Treatment
90 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
number of sympodial branches per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.82e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of sympodial branches per plant, total dry matter production per plant and absolute growth rate (13.82, 140.14 g and 1.81 g plant-1 day-1, respectively on pooled basis) and yield attributes viz., number of bolls per plant and boll weight (12.74 and 3.68 g, respectively on pooled basis) were significantly higher at a wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing increased cotton dry matter production per plant.

Treatment
90 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
total dry matter production per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
140.14 ge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of sympodial branches per plant, total dry matter production per plant and absolute growth rate (13.82, 140.14 g and 1.81 g plant-1 day-1, respectively on pooled basis) and yield attributes viz., number of bolls per plant and boll weight (12.74 and 3.68 g, respectively on pooled basis) were significantly higher at a wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing increased cotton absolute growth rate.

Treatment
90 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
absolute growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.81 g plant-1 day-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of sympodial branches per plant, total dry matter production per plant and absolute growth rate (13.82, 140.14 g and 1.81 g plant-1 day-1, respectively on pooled basis) and yield attributes viz., number of bolls per plant and boll weight (12.74 and 3.68 g, respectively on pooled basis) were significantly higher at a wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing increased cotton boll number per plant.

Treatment
90 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
number of bolls per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.74e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of sympodial branches per plant, total dry matter production per plant and absolute growth rate (13.82, 140.14 g and 1.81 g plant-1 day-1, respectively on pooled basis) and yield attributes viz., number of bolls per plant and boll weight (12.74 and 3.68 g, respectively on pooled basis) were significantly higher at a wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing increased cotton boll weight.

Treatment
90 cm x 10 cme0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.68 ge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of sympodial branches per plant, total dry matter production per plant and absolute growth rate (13.82, 140.14 g and 1.81 g plant-1 day-1, respectively on pooled basis) and yield attributes viz., number of bolls per plant and boll weight (12.74 and 3.68 g, respectively on pooled basis) were significantly higher at a wider row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest fertilizer dose increased cotton light interception.

Treatment
100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1e0
Outcome
light interception ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
47.40, 58.76 and 82.04% plant-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“light interception ratio was significantly higher with the application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 ( 47.40, 58.76 and 82.04% plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–2012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest fertilizer dose with mepiquat chloride had lower cotton light interception.

Treatment
60:30:30 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiqnat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DASe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
44.15 and 65.74% plant-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower was observed with the application of 60:30:30 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiqnat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS (44.15 and 65.74% plant-1 at 90 and 120 DAS, respectively on pooled basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer with mepiquat chloride increased seed cotton yield.

Treatment
100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DASe0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2915 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS recoded significantly higher seed cotton yield (2915 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2226–2380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer with mepiquat chloride increased cotton growth and yield attributes.

Outcome
growth and yield attributing characterse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the same treatment recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributing characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2390–2479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low fertilizer produced lower seed cotton yield.

Treatment
60:30:30 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
Lowere0
Value
2392 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower seed cotton yield was recorded with the application of 60:30:30 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 (2392 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2480–2584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing with high fertilizer increased cotton light interception.

Treatment
closer spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of higher fertilizer dose of 100:50:50 N, P2O5 and K2O kg ha-1e0
Outcome
light interception ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
50.53, 61.69 and 85.02 per cent plant-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“closer spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of higher fertilizer dose of 100:50:50 N, P2O5 and K2O kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher light interception ratio of 50.53, 61.69 and 85.02 per cent plant-1 at 60, 90 and 120 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2656–2893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing and high fertilizer with mepiquat chloride yielded 3178 kg per hectare of seed cotton.

Treatment
row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DASe0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3178 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS recoded significantly higher seed cotton yield (3178 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2942–3135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing and medium fertilizer with mepiquat chloride yielded 3031 kg per hectare of seed cotton.

Treatment
row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of 80:40:40 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DASe0
Value
3031 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“row spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with application of 80:40:40 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS (3031 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3165–3310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing with high fertilizer and mepiquat chloride had higher cotton growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm along with application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DASe0
Outcome
growth and yield attributing characterse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributing characters were higher under the combination of a row spacing of 90 cm x 10 cm along with application of 100:50:50 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1 + mepiquat chloride @ 250 ppm sprayed at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3319–3529 · show in text ↑

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 67 positive, 11 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.