Abstract
Tomato (Jinglu 6335) was selected for assessing the impact of varying fertilizer (F:N-P2O5-K2O) and aeration rates on crop quality, as well as water and fertilizer utilization efficiency during the cyclic aeration subsurface drip irrigation process. Four aeration treatments (O1, O2, O3, and S, representing aeration ratios of 16.25%, 14.58%, 11.79%, and non-aerated treatment, respectively) and three fertilizer applications (F1: 240–120–150 kg/hm2, F2: 180–90–112.5 kg/hm2, F3: 120–60–75 kg/hm2) were compared in a total of 12 treatments in this study. This study revealed that cyclic aerated drip irrigation improved the fruit quality. The aerated treatment resulted in increased accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, with the level of aeration positively correlating with the increase in nutrient accumulation, reaching the highest values in the high aeration irrigation treatment. The highest nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and water use efficiency occurred under the medium fertilizer with high aeration treatment. The maximum partial productivity of the fertilizer occurred under the low fertilizer with high aeration treatment, while the minimum occurred in the high fertilizer with non-aerated treatment. Taking all factors into consideration, the high-aeration and medium-fertilizer treatment was the most effective combination for greenhouse tomatoes under the conditions in this experiment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Cyclic aerated drip irrigation improved tomato fruit quality.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- cyclic aerated drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cyclic aerated drip irrigation improved the fruit quality”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Aeration increased nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- aerated treatmente0
- Outcome
- accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassiume0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The aerated treatment resulted in increased accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, with the level of aeration positively correlating with the increase in nutrient accumulation, reaching the highest values in the high aeration irrigation treatment.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient accumulation increased with aeration level and peaked under high aeration.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- level of aeratione0
- Outcome
- nutrient accumulatione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- high aeration irrigation treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the level of aeration positively correlating with the increase in nutrient accumulation, reaching the highest values in the high aeration irrigation treatment”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium fertilizer with high aeration gave the highest nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and water use efficiencies.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- medium fertilizer with high aeration treatmente0
- Outcome
- nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and water use efficiency occurred under the medium fertilizer with high aeration treatment.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Low fertilizer with high aeration maximized fertilizer partial productivity.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- low fertilizer with high aeration treatmente0
- Outcome
- partial productivity of the fertilizere0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum partial productivity of the fertilizer occurred under the low fertilizer with high aeration treatment”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
High fertilizer without aeration minimized fertilizer partial productivity.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- high fertilizer with non-aerated treatmente0
- Outcome
- minimume0
- Direction
- minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the minimum occurred in the high fertilizer with non-aerated treatment”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors judged high aeration with medium fertilizer most effective for greenhouse tomatoes.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- high-aeration and medium-fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- most effective combinatione0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the high-aeration and medium-fertilizer treatment was the most effective combination for greenhouse tomatoes under the conditions in this experiment”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.