Paper · 2024 · Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences

ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF CABBAGE PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION LEVELS AND SOIL AMENDMENTS IN A SEMI-ARID ENVIRONMENT

Kuume B. P. ENGUWA; Lydia N. HORN; Simon K. AWALA; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Crop production in small-scale farming communities in semi-arid Central Namibia faces significant challenges due to the high costs associated with irrigation and fertilizers. This study evaluated the impact of different irrigation levels (full and reduced) and six types of soil amendments—biochar, compost, zeolite, NPK, Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, hoof and horn combined with a bone meal (HHB meal), and control on the economic benefits of cabbage production and assessed their feasibility. In the first experiment, irrigation was implemented at 79.6 m³ (100% of the water requirement) for four days a week, classified as full irrigation, and at 39.6 m³ (50% of the water requirement) for two days a week, termed reduced irrigation. Among the fully irrigated treatments, Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, zeolite, and NPK demonstrated the highest Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) at 3.81, 3.67, and 3.65, respectively. In the second experiment, irrigation schedules were adjusted to five and four days per week, using a total of 136.0 m³ (170% of the water requirement) and 124.8 m³ (150% of the water requirement) of water. The compost, HHB meal, and NPK application rates were also modified. The fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meal achieved the highest and comparable yields of marketable cabbage heads per hectare, with BCRs of 3.43, 3.24, and 3.29, respectively. In conclusion, utilizing fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meal could be effective practices for sustainable crop production in the semi-arid, sandy soil conditions typical of Central Namibia. Moreover, local biochar production could enhance sustainability by reducing overall production costs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel had the highest benefit-cost ratio of 3.81 among the fully irrigated treatments.

Treatment
Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogele1
Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs)e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3.81e1
Comparator
fully irrigated treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the fully irrigated treatments, Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, zeolite, and NPK demonstrated the highest Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) at 3.81, 3.67, and 3.65, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.67 among the fully irrigated treatments.

Treatment
zeolitee1
Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs)e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3.67e1
Comparator
fully irrigated treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the fully irrigated treatments, Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, zeolite, and NPK demonstrated the highest Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) at 3.81, 3.67, and 3.65, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.65 among the fully irrigated treatments.

Treatment
NPKe1
Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs)e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3.65e1
Comparator
fully irrigated treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the fully irrigated treatments, Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, zeolite, and NPK demonstrated the highest Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) at 3.81, 3.67, and 3.65, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK and reduced irrigation with HHB meal achieved the highest and comparable yields of marketable cabbage heads per hectare.

Treatment
fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meale2
Outcome
yields of marketable cabbage heads per hectaree2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e2

“The fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meal achieved the highest and comparable yields of marketable cabbage heads per hectare, with BCRs of 3.43, 3.24, and 3.29, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.43 in the second experiment.

Treatment
Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogele2
Outcome
BCRse2
Value
3.43e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e2

“The fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meal achieved the highest and comparable yields of marketable cabbage heads per hectare, with BCRs of 3.43, 3.24, and 3.29, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.24 in the second experiment.

Treatment
NPKe2
Outcome
BCRse2
Value
3.24e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e2

“The fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meal achieved the highest and comparable yields of marketable cabbage heads per hectare, with BCRs of 3.43, 3.24, and 3.29, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation with HHB meal had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.29 in the second experiment.

Treatment
reduced irrigation with HHB meale2
Outcome
BCRse2
Value
3.29e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e2

“The fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meal achieved the highest and comparable yields of marketable cabbage heads per hectare, with BCRs of 3.43, 3.24, and 3.29, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1405 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK and reduced irrigation with HHB meal could be effective practices for sustainable crop production in Central Namibia.

Outcome
effective practices for sustainable crop productione3
Setting
Central Namibiae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“In conclusion, utilizing fully irrigated Be-Grow Boost (L) hydrogel, NPK, and reduced irrigation with HHB meal could be effective practices for sustainable crop production in the semi-arid, sandy soil conditions typical of Central Namibia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1645 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Local biochar production could enhance sustainability by reducing overall production costs.

Treatment
local biochar productione4
Outcome
sustainabilitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
e4

“Moreover, local biochar production could enhance sustainability by reducing overall production costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1747 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 50 positive, 5 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 47 positive, 17 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

other · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.