Paper · 2023 · Irrigation and Drainage

Comparative effect of different irrigation levels and soil amendments on cabbage productivity in semi‐arid Central Namibia

Kuume B. P. Enguwa; Lydia N. Horn; Simon K. Awala

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract In semi‐arid Central Namibia, poor sandy soils limit sustainable crop production. We assessed cabbage performance in two split‐plot field experiments. In Experiment 1, treatments comprised two irrigation levels: full irrigation (watered 3 days a week) and reduced irrigation (watered 2 days a week) as the main plot factor and six soil amendments (biochar; compost; zeolite; nitrogen, phosphorus potassium [NPK]; Be‐Grow boost [L] hydrogel; and hoof and horn + bone [HHB] meal) as subplot factors in three replications. Full irrigation produced a significantly higher yield (21.1 t ha −1 ), head weight (0.958 kg) and larger head girths (42.1 cm). Biochar produced the highest marketable heads (24,884 heads ha −1 ), water use efficiency (76.0 kg ha −1 mm −1 ) and the largest head girths (42.7 cm). In Experiment 2, water was applied 5 and 4 days a week for full and reduced irrigation; the application rates of compost, HHB meal, Be‐Grow boost (L) hydrogel and NPK were modified. The interaction of Be‐Grow boost (L) hydrogel, NPK and biochar with full irrigation and HHB meal with reduced irrigation produced more marketable heads (28,935, 28,009, 27,546 and 28,703 heads ha −1 , respectively). Therefore, full irrigation with these amendments could be used for resilient cabbage production in Central Namibia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation increased cabbage yield.

Treatment
Full irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.1 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full irrigation produced a significantly higher yield (21.1 t ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation increased cabbage head weight.

Treatment
Full irrigatione0
Outcome
head weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.958 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full irrigation produced a significantly higher yield (21.1 t ha −1 ), head weight (0.958 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation produced larger cabbage head girths.

Treatment
Full irrigatione0
Outcome
head girthse0
Direction
largere0
Value
42.1 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full irrigation produced a significantly higher yield (21.1 t ha −1 ), head weight (0.958 kg) and larger head girths (42.1 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar produced the highest number of marketable cabbage heads.

Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
marketable headse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
24,884 heads ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar produced the highest marketable heads (24,884 heads ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar produced the highest water use efficiency.

Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
76.0 kg ha −1 mm −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar produced the highest marketable heads (24,884 heads ha −1 ), water use efficiency (76.0 kg ha −1 mm −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar produced the largest cabbage head girths.

Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
head girthse0
Direction
largeste0
Value
42.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar produced the highest marketable heads (24,884 heads ha −1 ), water use efficiency (76.0 kg ha −1 mm −1 ) and the largest head girths (42.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Be-Grow boost hydrogel with full irrigation produced more marketable heads.

Treatment
Be‐Grow boost (L) hydrogele0
Outcome
marketable headse0
Direction
moree0
Value
28,935e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of Be‐Grow boost (L) hydrogel, NPK and biochar with full irrigation and HHB meal with reduced irrigation produced more marketable heads (28,935, 28,009, 27,546 and 28,703 heads ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with full irrigation produced more marketable heads.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
marketable headse0
Direction
moree0
Value
28,009e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of Be‐Grow boost (L) hydrogel, NPK and biochar with full irrigation and HHB meal with reduced irrigation produced more marketable heads (28,935, 28,009, 27,546 and 28,703 heads ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with full irrigation produced more marketable heads.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
marketable headse0
Direction
moree0
Value
27,546e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of Be‐Grow boost (L) hydrogel, NPK and biochar with full irrigation and HHB meal with reduced irrigation produced more marketable heads (28,935, 28,009, 27,546 and 28,703 heads ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HHB meal with reduced irrigation produced more marketable heads.

Treatment
HHB meale0
Outcome
marketable headse0
Direction
moree0
Value
28,703 heads ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of Be‐Grow boost (L) hydrogel, NPK and biochar with full irrigation and HHB meal with reduced irrigation produced more marketable heads (28,935, 28,009, 27,546 and 28,703 heads ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend full irrigation with the amendments for resilient cabbage production.

Outcome
full irrigation with these amendments could be used for resilient cabbage productione0
Setting
Central Namibiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, full irrigation with these amendments could be used for resilient cabbage production in Central Namibia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1322 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 50 positive, 5 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 47 positive, 17 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

biochar · physiology: water · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.