Paper · 2024 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of foliar nutrition on productivity and profitability of mungbean (Vigna radiata) in western Rajasthan

MOTI LAL MEHRIYA; BHERU LAL KUMHAR; DEVENDRA SINGH; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2021 and 2022 at Agricultural Research Station (Agriculture University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan), Mandor, Rajasthan to evaluate the impact of foliar nutrient application on mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] growth, yield, and economic returns. The mungbean variety GM4 was used for the study. The treatment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD) comprised of 8 treatments, viz. T1, Water spray; T2, 2% urea; T3, 2% DAP (diammonium phosphate); T4, NPK (18:18:18) @2%; T5, 0.5% ZnSO4; T6, 2% urea + 0.5% ZnSO4; T7, 2% DAP + 0.5% ZnSO4; and T8, NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4, replicated thrice. All foliar nutrient applications were performed at pre-flowering and pod initiation stages. The treatment involving foliar spray of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4 during these stages exhibited superior performance in terms of growth parameters and yield, including number of nodules/plant, plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, test weight (g), and overall yield compared to the control. This treatment showed comparable efficacy to the application of 2% NPK (18:18:18). Additionally, foliar application of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4 resulted in significantly higher gross monetary returns (₹107,096/ha) and net monetary returns (₹80,156/ha). However, the treatment combining 2% urea + 0.5% ZnSO4 exhibited the highest benefit to cost ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus zinc foliar spray gave superior mungbean growth and yield traits versus water spray.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar spray of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
number of nodules/plant, plant height (cm), number of branches/plante0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
during these stagese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment involving foliar spray of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4 during these stages exhibited superior performance in terms of growth parameters and yield, including number of nodules/plant, plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, test weight (g), and overall yield compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus zinc foliar spray gave superior mungbean pod and seed yield components versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar spray of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, test weight (g)e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment involving foliar spray of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4 during these stages exhibited superior performance in terms of growth parameters and yield, including number of nodules/plant, plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, test weight (g), and overall yield compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus zinc foliar spray gave superior overall mungbean yield versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar spray of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
overall yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment involving foliar spray of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4 during these stages exhibited superior performance in terms of growth parameters and yield, including number of nodules/plant, plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, test weight (g), and overall yield compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus zinc spray had comparable efficacy to NPK alone.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
comparable efficacye0
Comparator
the application of 2% NPK (18:18:18)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment showed comparable efficacy to the application of 2% NPK (18:18:18).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus zinc spray produced significantly higher gross monetary returns of ₹107,096/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar application of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
gross monetary returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹107,096/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4 resulted in significantly higher gross monetary returns (₹107,096/ha) and net monetary returns (₹80,156/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus zinc spray produced significantly higher net monetary returns of ₹80,156/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar application of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
net monetary returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹80,156/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of NPK (18:18:18) @2% + 0.5% ZnSO4 resulted in significantly higher gross monetary returns (₹107,096/ha) and net monetary returns (₹80,156/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea plus zinc had the highest benefit to cost ratio.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
2% urea + 0.5% ZnSO4e0
Outcome
benefit to cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment combining 2% urea + 0.5% ZnSO4 exhibited the highest benefit to cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.