Paper · 2024 · Sustainability

Nitrogen Level Impacting Fruit Yield and Quality of Mango in Northern Tropical Australia

Constancio A. Asis; Joanne Tilbrook; Dallas Anson; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is vital for mango yield and fruit quality, but finding the optimal amount is crucial to avoid the ‘stay green’ problem, which diminishes both fruit quality and profitability. This study aimed to assess the impact of N levels on the fruit quality and yield of ‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes and determine the amount of N that triggers the ‘stay green’ effect in fruit. A field trial was conducted in a commercial orchard with N treatments (0, 12.5, 25, and 50 kg ha−1) and four replications during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons. Fruit yield was quantified, and post-harvest quality (skin color during ripening, sugar content [°Brix], and texture) as well as ethylene effects were assessed. Fruit yields did not vary among N levels over the two cropping seasons but were significantly lower in 2018 (20.0 t ha−1) compared to 2019 (38.5 t ha−1), illustrating the alternate year-bearing habit of ‘KP’ mangoes. In the 2018 harvest, fruit from trees receiving 25 kg N ha−1 appeared yellow–green compared to those with less N, while fruit from trees with 50 kg N ha−1 exhibited ‘stay green’ skin, indicating that applications of 25 and 50 kg N ha−1 were excessive. There was no ‘stay green’ skin observed in the 2019 harvest, indicating that the environment may also be a contributing factor. The texture of ripe fruit from untreated control trees had the highest flesh resistance. Moreover, ethylene-treated fruit ripened in nine days post-harvest and had significantly lower sugar content than untreated fruit, which ripened in 14 days. This study provides valuable insights into the complex interactions among N application, fruit quality, and yield of ‘KP’ mangoes, highlighting the importance of appropriate N management for a sustainable and environmentally friendly commercial mango production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield did not vary among nitrogen levels across two seasons.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
Fruit yieldse0
Direction
did not varye0
Comparator
N levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yields did not vary among N levels over the two cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield was lower in 2018 than 2019.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Outcome
Fruit yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20.0 t ha−1e0
Qualifier
38.5 t ha−1e0
Comparator
2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yields did not vary among N levels over the two cropping seasons but were significantly lower in 2018 (20.0 t ha−1) compared to 2019 (38.5 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from trees receiving 25 kg N ha−1 appeared yellow–green relative to lower nitrogen levels in 2018.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
25 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
yellow–greene0
Qualifier
2018 harveste0
Comparator
those with less Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 2018 harvest, fruit from trees receiving 25 kg N ha−1 appeared yellow–green compared to those with less N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from trees receiving 50 kg N ha−1 exhibited stay-green skin in 2018.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
50 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
‘stay green’ skine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit from trees with 50 kg N ha−1 exhibited ‘stay green’ skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stay-green skin was absent in the 2019 harvest.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Outcome
no ‘stay green’ skine0
Qualifier
2019 harveste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no ‘stay green’ skin observed in the 2019 harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripe fruit from untreated trees had the highest flesh resistance.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
untreated control treese0
Outcome
flesh resistancee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The texture of ripe fruit from untreated control trees had the highest flesh resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene-treated fruit ripened in nine days versus 14 days for untreated fruit.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
ethylene-treatede0
Outcome
ripenede0
Value
nine dayse0
Qualifier
14 dayse0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethylene-treated fruit ripened in nine days post-harvest and had significantly lower sugar content than untreated fruit, which ripened in 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene-treated fruit had significantly lower sugar content than untreated fruit.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
ethylene-treatede0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethylene-treated fruit ripened in nine days post-harvest and had significantly lower sugar content than untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Kensington Pride’ (‘KP’) mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 22 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.