Abstract
This study was conducted at the Horticulture Research Centre, Pattharchatta, and the Post-Harvest Laboratory of the Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, from April to May 2021. The experiment utilized a Factorial Completely Randomized Design (FCRD) with two factors and included twelve treatments: Control (T1), Calcium Nitrate at 0.5% (T2), Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% (T3), Putrescine at 100 ppm (T4), Putrescine at 200 ppm (T5), Putrescine at 300 ppm (T6), Calcium Nitrate at 0.5% combined with Putrescine at 100 ppm (T7), 200 ppm (T8), and 300 ppm (T9), and Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% combined with Putrescine at 100 ppm (T10), 200 ppm (T11), and 300 ppm (T12). These treatments were tested across six storage intervals (0, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 days), with 12 treatment combinations replicated three times. After harvesting, the fruits were stored in a refrigerator for further analysis, during which parameters such as fruit weight, fruit diameter, TSS (total soluble solids) to acid ratio, reducing sugars, and non-reducing sugars were evaluated. Among the treatments, T10 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 100 ppm) was most effective, followed by T11 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 200 ppm), in minimizing fruit weight and diameter loss while maintaining the TSS to acid ratio and sugar content throughout the storage period.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
T10 best minimized fruit weight and diameter loss during storage.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Material
- Pratapt1
- Treatment
- Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- fruit weight and diameter losse0
- Direction
- minimizinge0
- Qualifier
- throughout the storage periode0
- Comparator
- T11e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T10 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 100 ppm) was most effective, followed by T11 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 200 ppm), in minimizing fruit weight and diameter loss while maintaining the TSS to acid ratio and sugar content throughout the storage period”
t0“peach”
t1“Pratap”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 ranked second for minimizing fruit weight and diameter loss during storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Material
- Pratapt1
- Treatment
- Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 200 ppme0
- Outcome
- fruit weight and diameter losse0
- Direction
- minimizinge0
- Comparator
- T10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T10 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 100 ppm) was most effective, followed by T11 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 200 ppm), in minimizing fruit weight and diameter loss while maintaining the TSS to acid ratio and sugar content throughout the storage period”
t0“peach”
t1“Pratap”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 best maintained TSS to acid ratio and sugar content during storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Material
- Pratapt1
- Treatment
- Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- TSS to acid ratio and sugar contente0
- Direction
- maintaininge0
- Comparator
- T11e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T10 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 100 ppm) was most effective, followed by T11 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 200 ppm), in minimizing fruit weight and diameter loss while maintaining the TSS to acid ratio and sugar content throughout the storage period”
t0“peach”
t1“Pratap”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 ranked second for maintaining TSS to acid ratio and sugar content during storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Material
- Pratapt1
- Treatment
- Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 200 ppme0
- Outcome
- TSS to acid ratio and sugar contente0
- Direction
- maintaininge0
- Comparator
- T10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T10 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 100 ppm) was most effective, followed by T11 (Calcium Nitrate at 1.0% + Putrescine at 200 ppm), in minimizing fruit weight and diameter loss while maintaining the TSS to acid ratio and sugar content throughout the storage period”
t0“peach”
t1“Pratap”
The same questions in other papers
putrescine · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →calcium nitrate · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
calcium nitrate · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
putrescine · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.