Paper · 2024 · Plants

Synergistic Effect of Sugarcane Bagasse and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Eco-Remediation of Cadmium-Contaminated Saline Soils in Wheat Cultivation

Emad M. Hafez; Khadiga Alharbi; Hany S. Gharib; et al.

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil contamination with cadmium (Cd) and salinity poses a significant challenge, affecting crop health and productivity. This study explores the combined application of sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) to mitigate the toxic effects of Cd and salinity in wheat plants. Field experiments conducted in Cd-contaminated saline soils revealed that the application of SCB (0, 5, and 10 t ha−1) and ZnO NPs (0, 12.5, and 25 mg L−1) significantly improved key soil physicochemical properties, including soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP). The combined application of SCB and ZnO NPs significantly mitigated the effects of Cd and salinity on soil and wheat plants. SCB (10 t ha−1) reduced soil pH by 6.2% and ESP by 30.8% compared to the control, while increasing microbial biomass by 151.1%. ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1) reduced Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seeds by 46.3%, while SCB and ZnO NPs combined achieved a reduction of 74.1% and 62.9%, respectively. These amendments enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, with catalase (CAT) increasing by 35.3% and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) by 54.9%. Wheat grain yield increased by 42% with SCB alone and by 75.2% with combined SCB and ZnO NP treatment, underscoring their potential as eco-friendly soil amendments for saline, Cd-contaminated soils. These results underscore the potential of SCB and ZnO NPs as eco-friendly amendments for improving wheat productivity in contaminated soils, offering a promising strategy for sustainable agriculture in salt-affected areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The amendments significantly improved soil physicochemical properties.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
SCB (0, 5, and 10 t ha−1) and ZnO NPs (0, 12.5, and 25 mg L−1)e0
Outcome
soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of SCB (0, 5, and 10 t ha−1) and ZnO NPs (0, 12.5, and 25 mg L−1) significantly improved key soil physicochemical properties, including soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–604 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amendments significantly mitigated cadmium and salinity effects on soil and wheat.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
SCB and ZnO NPse0
Outcome
effects of Cd and salinity on soil and wheat plantse0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of SCB and ZnO NPs significantly mitigated the effects of Cd and salinity on soil and wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagasse at 10 t ha−1 reduced soil pH by 6.2% versus control.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
SCB (10 t ha−1)e0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6.2%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCB (10 t ha−1) reduced soil pH by 6.2% and ESP by 30.8% compared to the control, while increasing microbial biomass by 151.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagasse at 10 t ha−1 reduced ESP by 30.8% versus control.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
SCB (10 t ha−1)e0
Outcome
ESPe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30.8%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCB (10 t ha−1) reduced soil pH by 6.2% and ESP by 30.8% compared to the control, while increasing microbial biomass by 151.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagasse at 10 t ha−1 increased soil microbial biomass by 151.1%.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
SCB (10 t ha−1)e0
Outcome
microbial biomasse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
151.1%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCB (10 t ha−1) reduced soil pH by 6.2% and ESP by 30.8% compared to the control, while increasing microbial biomass by 151.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles at 25 mg L−1 reduced cadmium in wheat shoots by 43.3%.

Treatment
ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1)e0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in wheat shootse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
43.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1) reduced Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seeds by 46.3%, while SCB and ZnO NPs combined achieved a reduction of 74.1% and 62.9%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles at 25 mg L−1 reduced cadmium in wheat seeds by 46.3%.

Treatment
ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1)e0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1) reduced Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seeds by 46.3%, while SCB and ZnO NPs combined achieved a reduction of 74.1% and 62.9%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amendments reduced cadmium accumulation in wheat shoots by 74.1%.

Treatment
SCB and ZnO NPs combinede0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in wheat shootse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
74.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1) reduced Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seeds by 46.3%, while SCB and ZnO NPs combined achieved a reduction of 74.1% and 62.9%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amendments reduced cadmium accumulation in wheat seeds by 62.9%.

Treatment
SCB and ZnO NPs combinede0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seedse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
62.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnO NPs (25 mg L−1) reduced Cd accumulation in wheat shoots by 43.3% and seeds by 46.3%, while SCB and ZnO NPs combined achieved a reduction of 74.1% and 62.9%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments increased catalase activity by 35.3%.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
These amendmentse0
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
35.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These amendments enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, with catalase (CAT) increasing by 35.3% and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) by 54.9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments increased ascorbate peroxidase activity by 54.9%.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
These amendmentse0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
54.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These amendments enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, with catalase (CAT) increasing by 35.3% and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) by 54.9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagasse alone increased wheat grain yield by 42%.

Treatment
SCB alonee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield increased by 42% with SCB alone and by 75.2% with combined SCB and ZnO NP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bagasse and ZnO nanoparticle treatment increased wheat grain yield by 75.2%.

Treatment
combined SCB and ZnO NP treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
75.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield increased by 42% with SCB alone and by 75.2% with combined SCB and ZnO NP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1270 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

zinc oxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

other · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.