Paper · 2022 · Plants

Potassium and Humic Acid Synergistically Increase Salt Tolerance and Nutrient Uptake in Contrasting Wheat Genotypes through Ionic Homeostasis and Activation of Antioxidant Enzymes

Ghulam Abbas; Sadia Rehman; Manzer H. Siddiqui; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
62
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity limits the growth and nutrient uptake in crop species. Studies show that both potassium (K) and humic acid (HA) improved plant tolerance to salinity. However, the interactive effect of K and HA on plant tolerance to salinity stress remains unknown. This pot study examined the effect of application of K (0, 5 or 10 mM) and HA (0 or 2 g kg−1), alone or in combination, on the growth and physiology under salinity (100 mM NaCl) in two wheat genotypes (SARC 1, salt tolerant; and SARC 5, salt sensitive). The results revealed that salt stress reduced shoot biomass by 35% and 49% in SARC 1 and SARC 5, respectively. Salinity induced overproduction of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation in both genotypes, but the decline in pigments and stomatal conductance was more profound in SARC 5 than in SARC 1. Combined application of 10 mM K and HA was most effective in alleviating salt stress with improved plant biomass by 47% and 43% in SARC 1 and SARC 5, respectively. Combined application of 10 mM K and HA mitigated salt and induced oxidative stress with the activities of APX, CAT, POD and SOD increased by up to 2.8 folds in SARC 1, and by upto 2.5 folds in SARC 5, respectively. Root and shoot Na contents were increased, while K, Fe and Zn contents were decreased under saline conditions. HA combined with K decreased Na and increased K, Fe and Zn contents in both genotypes. Combined application of 10 mM K and HA was more promising for increasing wheat salt tolerance and nutrient uptake and genotype SARC 1 performed better than SARC 5 for cultivation on saline soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced shoot biomass by 35% in SARC 1.

Material
SARC 1e1
Treatment
salt stresse1
Outcome
shoot biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
35%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt stress reduced shoot biomass by 35% and 49% in SARC 1 and SARC 5, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced shoot biomass by 49% in SARC 5.

Material
SARC 5e1
Treatment
salt stresse1
Outcome
shoot biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
49%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt stress reduced shoot biomass by 35% and 49% in SARC 1 and SARC 5, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased overproduction of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation in both wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Salinitye2
Outcome
overproduction of H2O2 and lipid peroxidatione2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“Salinity induced overproduction of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–703 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decline in pigments and stomatal conductance was more profound in SARC 5 than in SARC 1.

Material
SARC 5e0
Outcome
decline in pigments and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
more profounde0
Comparator
SARC 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the decline in pigments and stomatal conductance was more profound in SARC 5 than in SARC 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 10 mM K and HA improved plant biomass by 47% in SARC 1.

Material
SARC 1e3
Treatment
Combined application of 10 mM K and HAe3
Outcome
plant biomasse3
Direction
improvede3
Value
47%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“Combined application of 10 mM K and HA was most effective in alleviating salt stress with improved plant biomass by 47% and 43% in SARC 1 and SARC 5, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 10 mM K and HA improved plant biomass by 43% in SARC 5.

Material
SARC 5e3
Treatment
Combined application of 10 mM K and HAe3
Outcome
plant biomasse3
Direction
improvede3
Value
43%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“Combined application of 10 mM K and HA was most effective in alleviating salt stress with improved plant biomass by 47% and 43% in SARC 1 and SARC 5, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 10 mM K and HA increased APX, CAT, POD and SOD activities by up to 2.8 folds in SARC 1.

Material
SARC 1e4
Treatment
Combined application of 10 mM K and HAe4
Outcome
activities of APX, CAT, POD and SODe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
2.8 foldse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“Combined application of 10 mM K and HA mitigated salt and induced oxidative stress with the activities of APX, CAT, POD and SOD increased by up to 2.8 folds in SARC 1, and by upto 2.5 folds in SARC 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 10 mM K and HA increased APX, CAT, POD and SOD activities by up to 2.5 folds in SARC 5.

Material
SARC 5e4
Treatment
Combined application of 10 mM K and HAe4
Outcome
activities of APX, CAT, POD and SODe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
2.5 foldse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“Combined application of 10 mM K and HA mitigated salt and induced oxidative stress with the activities of APX, CAT, POD and SOD increased by up to 2.8 folds in SARC 1, and by upto 2.5 folds in SARC 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1165 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot Na contents increased under saline conditions.

Organ / stage
Root and shoote5
Treatment
saline conditionse5
Outcome
Na contentse5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“Root and shoot Na contents were increased, while K, Fe and Zn contents were decreased under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1290 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K, Fe and Zn contents decreased under saline conditions.

Treatment
saline conditionse5
Outcome
K, Fe and Zn contentse5
Direction
decreasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“Root and shoot Na contents were increased, while K, Fe and Zn contents were decreased under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA combined with K decreased Na content in both genotypes.

Treatment
HA combined with Ke6
Outcome
Nae6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“HA combined with K decreased Na and increased K, Fe and Zn contents in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA combined with K increased K, Fe and Zn contents in both genotypes.

Treatment
HA combined with Ke6
Outcome
K, Fe and Zn contentse6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“HA combined with K decreased Na and increased K, Fe and Zn contents in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1377 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 10 mM K and HA is more promising for increasing wheat salt tolerance and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
Combined application of 10 mM K and HAe7
Outcome
salt tolerance and nutrient uptakee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e7

“Combined application of 10 mM K and HA was more promising for increasing wheat salt tolerance and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1492 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype SARC 1 performed better than SARC 5 for cultivation on saline soils.

Material
SARC 1e0
Outcome
performede0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
SARC 5e0
Setting
saline soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contrasting Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“genotype SARC 1 performed better than SARC 5 for cultivation on saline soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1573 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 64 positive, 11 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 10 positive, 73 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

other · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 100 positive, 14 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

other · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.