Paper · 2024 · Biopesticides International

Biofortification of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) by Foliar Application of Agrochemicals and Growth Regulators for Improved Nutrient Assimilation, Oil Quality, and Crop Yield

MONIKA SHARMA AND PRASANN KUMAR

14
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biofortification of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) by foliar application of growth regulators and agrochemicals is a potential method to improve crop yield and oil quality. The effects of boron, sulfur, and cytokinin on physiological and biochemical processes, including photosynthesis, nutrient assimilation, and assimilate partitioning, were determined. Physicochemical properties, such as density, saponification value, iodine value, peroxide value (PV), p-anisidine value (p-AV), and totox value of mustard oils were studied to evaluate the compositional quality of oils and also to investigate the effect of agrochemicals on quality attributes of the oil. These applications significantly improved the oil quality of mustard by enhancing oil content and modifying fatty acid composition. Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls. These treatments also improved the fatty acid profile, with boron and sulfur boosting oleic acid levels by 8-12% and reducing erucic acid content by 10-15%, resulting in a healthier oil composition. Increased saponification, peroxide, and p-AVs along with refractive index and oil density by 66.66, 33.33, 19.35, 0.14, and 0.11%, respectively, suggested the improved oil quality. Combining B, S, and cytokinin at various doses (P < 0.05) improved the quality parameters of mustard oil. Such improved elements provide significant advantages for industrial and consumable uses. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in this study revealed biochemical shifts, such as increased lipid and protein synthesis, directly influencing oil quality and yield. These findings underscore the potential of strategic foliar interventions to optimize mustard cultivation while ensuring efficient resource use.. KEYWORDS :Agrochemicals, Biochemicals, Mustard, Micronutrient, Oil analysis, Phytohormone, Zero hunger

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron increased oil content by 15-20% relative to controls.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Borone1
Outcome
oil contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
15-20%e1
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–927 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased oil content by 10-15% relative to controls.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
sulfure1
Outcome
oil contente1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
10-15e1
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–927 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytokinin increased oil content by 5-10% relative to controls.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
cytokinine1
Outcome
oil contente1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
5-10%e1
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–927 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron boosted oleic acid levels by 8-12% relative to controls.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
borone2
Outcome
oleic acid levelse2
Direction
boostinge2
Value
8-12%e2
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“These treatments also improved the fatty acid profile, with boron and sulfur boosting oleic acid levels by 8-12% and reducing erucic acid content by 10-15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–927 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur boosted oleic acid levels by 8-12% relative to controls.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
sulfure2
Outcome
oleic acid levelse2
Direction
boostinge2
Value
8-12%e2
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“These treatments also improved the fatty acid profile, with boron and sulfur boosting oleic acid levels by 8-12% and reducing erucic acid content by 10-15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–927 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron reduced erucic acid content by 10-15% relative to controls.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
borone2
Outcome
erucic acid contente2
Direction
reducinge2
Value
10-15%e2
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“These treatments also improved the fatty acid profile, with boron and sulfur boosting oleic acid levels by 8-12% and reducing erucic acid content by 10-15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–927 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur reduced erucic acid content by 10-15% relative to controls.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
sulfure2
Outcome
erucic acid contente2
Direction
reducinge2
Value
10-15%e2
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“These treatments also improved the fatty acid profile, with boron and sulfur boosting oleic acid levels by 8-12% and reducing erucic acid content by 10-15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron increased oil content by 15-20%, while sulfur and cytokinin contributed 10-15 and 5-10%, respectively, compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–927 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined boron, sulfur and cytokinin at various doses significantly improved quality parameters of mustard oil.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Combining B, S, and cytokinin at various dosese3
Outcome
quality parameters of mustard oile3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Combining B, S, and cytokinin at various doses (P < 0.05) improved the quality parameters of mustard oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1413 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saponification value increased by 66.66 in the treated mustard oil.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
saponificatione4
Direction
Increasede4
Value
66.66e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Increased saponification, peroxide, and p-AVs along with refractive index and oil density by 66.66, 33.33, 19.35, 0.14, and 0.11%, respectively, suggested the improved oil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1307 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxide value increased by 33.33 in the treated mustard oil.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
peroxidee4
Direction
Increasede4
Value
33.33e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Increased saponification, peroxide, and p-AVs along with refractive index and oil density by 66.66, 33.33, 19.35, 0.14, and 0.11%, respectively, suggested the improved oil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1307 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

p-anisidine value increased by 19.35 in the treated mustard oil.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
p-AVse4
Direction
Increasede4
Value
19.35e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Increased saponification, peroxide, and p-AVs along with refractive index and oil density by 66.66, 33.33, 19.35, 0.14, and 0.11%, respectively, suggested the improved oil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1307 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Refractive index increased by 0.14 in the treated mustard oil.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
refractive indexe4
Direction
Increasede4
Value
0.14e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Increased saponification, peroxide, and p-AVs along with refractive index and oil density by 66.66, 33.33, 19.35, 0.14, and 0.11%, respectively, suggested the improved oil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1307 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil density increased by 0.11 in the treated mustard oil.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
oil densitye4
Direction
Increasede4
Value
0.11e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Increased saponification, peroxide, and p-AVs along with refractive index and oil density by 66.66, 33.33, 19.35, 0.14, and 0.11%, respectively, suggested the improved oil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1307 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FTIR revealed biochemical shifts, including increased lipid and protein synthesis, that directly influence oil quality and yield.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
oil quality and yielde5
Qualifier
increased lipid and protein synthesise5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in this study revealed biochemical shifts, such as increased lipid and protein synthesis, directly influencing oil quality and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1677 · show in text ↑
e0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–55 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

boron atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

boron atom · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.