Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Antioxidant Responses in Chromium-Stressed Maize as Influenced by Foliar and Root Applications of Fulvic Acid

Farwa Iftikhar; Asma Zulfiqar; Atif Kamran; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
23
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Maize ( Zea mays L.) faces significant challenges to its growth and productivity from heavy metal stress, particularly Chromium (Cr) stress, which induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and damages photosynthetic tissues. This study aimed to investigate the effects of fulvic acid (FA) application, via foliar spray or root irrigation, on mitigating chromium stress in maize by evaluating its impact on antioxidant activity and growth parameters. Two maize varieties, P3939 and 30Y87, were subjected to chromium stress (CrCl 3 ·6H 2 O) at concentrations of 300 µM and 100 µM for a duration of 5 weeks. The experiment was conducted in a wire house under natural environmental conditions at the Seed Centre, Institute of Botany, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. Physiological assessments included electrolyte leakage, chlorophyll pigment content, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, and activities of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) in maize leaves. Growth parameters were also monitored. The results revealed that chromium stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content and increased oxidative stress, as evidenced by elevated MDA levels and electrolyte leakage. However, FA application notably mitigated these effects: chlorophyll content improved by 15%, and MDA levels decreased significantly. Irrigation with FA was particularly effective, reducing MDA levels by 40% compared to the 300 µM chromium treatment. Furthermore, while chromium stress enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, FA application further boosted total soluble protein levels and antioxidant enzyme activities under stress conditions. In conclusion, FA application demonstrates potential in improving maize tolerance to heavy metal stress by enhancing the antioxidant defense system and preserving photosynthetic pigments. These findings highlight FA’s promise as a practical strategy for mitigating the negative impacts of chromium stress on maize, promoting sustainable agricultural practices in contaminated environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium significantly reduced chlorophyll content.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chromium stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chromium stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium increased MDA and electrolyte leakage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chromium stresse1
Outcome
MDA levels and electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased oxidative stress, as evidenced by elevated MDA levels and electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“chromium stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid improved chlorophyll content by 15%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
FA applicatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FA application notably mitigated these effects: chlorophyll content improved by 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid significantly decreased MDA.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Fulvic Acidt1
Outcome
MDA levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA levels decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fulvic Acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid irrigation reduced MDA by 40% relative to 300 µM chromium.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Irrigation with FAe0
Outcome
MDA levelse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
300 µM chromium treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with FA was particularly effective, reducing MDA levels by 40% compared to the 300 µM chromium treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium increased antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chromium stresse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chromium stress enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid boosted soluble protein and antioxidant enzyme activities under stress.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
FA applicatione0
Outcome
total soluble protein levels and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
boostede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FA application further boosted total soluble protein levels and antioxidant enzyme activities under stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑

heavy metal · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

18 papers: 0 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

other · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

other · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

24 papers: 0 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.