Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of Conservation Tillage and Residue Mulch on Weed Dynamics and Productivity of Wheat Crop

Gugulothu Sumitra; S. Rajkumara; Kumar D. Lamani

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Conservation tillage and residue mulch plays an important role in controlling weed and enhancing wheat yield. These practices reduce soil disturbance and suppress weeds, improving soil health and moisture retention. This leads to better crop growth and higher wheat productivity. Methods: A experiment was conducted during rabi 2020-21 and 2021-22 at MARS, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to assess the effect of conservation tillage and residue mulch on weeds in wheat. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with 10 treatment combinations, including a randomized complete block design to compare outside control with treatment combinations. Result: Experimental results revealed that conventional tillage significantly reduced density of weeds. Conventional tillage decreased the total number of weeds and dry weight of weeds and higher weed control efficiency at 20, 40, 60 DAS and harvest stage, respectively. Conventional tillage significantly higher grain yield resulted lower weed index over minimum tillage. The high infestation of weeds under minimum tillage resulted in the lowest weed control efficiency among the tillage practices. Residue mulch application of glyricidia recorded lower number of weeds and dry weight of weeds. An increase in grain yield was registered with residue mulch application of glyricidia, maize, soybean and groundnut as compared to no residue. Glyricidia residue mulch recorded higher values of weed control efficiency and lower weed index. Based on the findings, it was concluded that conventional tillage with glyricidia residue mulch reduced population of mixed weed flora diversity and resulted in higher grain yield of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage significantly reduced weed density.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density of weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage significantly reduced density of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage decreased the total number of weeds.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total number of weedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage decreased the total number of weeds and dry weight of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage decreased weed dry weight.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage decreased the total number of weeds and dry weight of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had higher weed control efficiency at 20, 40 and 60 DAS and harvest.

Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
20, 40, 60 DAS and harvest stagee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher weed control efficiency at 20, 40, 60 DAS and harvest stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage significantly increased wheat grain yield over minimum tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage significantly higher grain yield resulted lower weed index over minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage lowered weed index relative to minimum tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage significantly higher grain yield resulted lower weed index over minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High weed infestation under minimum tillage produced the lowest weed control efficiency among tillage practices.

Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high infestation of weeds under minimum tillage resulted in the lowest weed control efficiency among the tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyricidia residue mulch lowered weed numbers.

Treatment
Residue mulch application of glyricidiae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weedse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residue mulch application of glyricidia recorded lower number of weeds and dry weight of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyricidia residue mulch lowered weed dry weight.

Treatment
Residue mulch application of glyricidiae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residue mulch application of glyricidia recorded lower number of weeds and dry weight of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyricidia mulch increased grain yield over no residue.

Treatment
residue mulch application of glyricidiae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
no residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in grain yield was registered with residue mulch application of glyricidia, maize, soybean and groundnut as compared to no residue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize mulch increased grain yield over no residue.

Treatment
maizee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
no residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in grain yield was registered with residue mulch application of glyricidia, maize, soybean and groundnut as compared to no residue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean mulch increased grain yield over no residue.

Treatment
soybeane0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
no residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in grain yield was registered with residue mulch application of glyricidia, maize, soybean and groundnut as compared to no residue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut mulch increased grain yield over no residue.

Treatment
groundnute0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
no residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in grain yield was registered with residue mulch application of glyricidia, maize, soybean and groundnut as compared to no residue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyricidia residue mulch gave higher weed control efficiency.

Treatment
Glyricidia residue mulche0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyricidia residue mulch recorded higher values of weed control efficiency and lower weed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyricidia residue mulch lowered weed index.

Treatment
Glyricidia residue mulche0
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyricidia residue mulch recorded higher values of weed control efficiency and lower weed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude conventional tillage with glyricidia mulch reduced mixed weed populations.

Treatment
conventional tillage with glyricidia residue mulche0
Interactor
mixed weed florae0weed
Outcome
population of mixed weed flora diversitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage with glyricidia residue mulch reduced population of mixed weed flora diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude conventional tillage with glyricidia mulch raised wheat grain yield.

Treatment
conventional tillage with glyricidia residue mulche0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage with glyricidia residue mulch reduced population of mixed weed flora diversity and resulted in higher grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

mulching · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

mulching · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 137 positive, 12 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.