Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

A Study on the Preparation of Multifunctional Bacillus spp. Composite Inoculants and Their Ability to Promote Watermelon Growth

Lin Li; Ke Liu; Fafa Lan; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The development of plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) is one of the important research topics in agricultural microbiology. Four bacterial isolates that exhibited nitrogen fixation, phosphate and potassium solubilization, as well as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and siderophore production abilities, were selected from biogas residue, namely BR-1, BR-16, BR-17, and BR-44. According to morphological and molecular biological identification, BR-1, BR-16, BR-17, and BR-44 belonged to Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium, and Bacillus subtilis, respectively. The four functional strains were combined into a composite microbial community. The optimal media were peptone (15 g/L), sucrose (10 g/L), and KCl (2 g/L); the optimal incubation conditions were an initial pH of 7.0, a volume of 47 mL/250 mL, an inoculum size of 6% v/v, an incubation temperature of 31 °C, a shaking speed of 205 r/min, and an incubation period of 20 h, as determined through a single factor test and the response surface methodology (RSM). In the optimized process, a liquid bacterial inoculant with an OD600 of 1.866 was obtained, with an effective viable count of 8.955 × 109 CFU/mL. A solid bacterial inoculant was prepared by using bran as a substrate, and its effective viable count was 1.11 × 109 CFU/g. The application of the bacterial inoculants promoted the growth of watermelon, increased the photosynthetic efficiency and yield, and improved fruit quality. This study provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the development and application of microbial inoculants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four bacterial isolates from biogas residue had nitrogen fixation, phosphate and potassium solubilization, IAA and siderophore production abilities.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
bacterial isolatese0
Outcome
nitrogen fixation, phosphate and potassium solubilization, as well as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and siderophore production abilitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four bacterial isolates that exhibited nitrogen fixation, phosphate and potassium solubilization, as well as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and siderophore production abilities, were selected from biogas residue, namely BR-1, BR-16, BR-17, and BR-44”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR-1 and BR-44 were identified as Bacillus subtilis.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
belonged to Bacillus subtilise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“BR-1, BR-16, BR-17, and BR-44 belonged to Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium, and Bacillus subtilis, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR-16 was identified as Bacillus cereus.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse0symbiont
Outcome
Bacillus cereuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“BR-1, BR-16, BR-17, and BR-44 belonged to Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium, and Bacillus subtilis, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR-17 was identified as Bacillus megaterium.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Bacillus megateriumPriestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
Bacillus megateriume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“BR-1, BR-16, BR-17, and BR-44 belonged to Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium, and Bacillus subtilis, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimized liquid inoculant reached OD600 1.866 and a viable count of 8.955 × 109 CFU/mL.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
effective viable counte0
Value
8.955 × 109 CFU/mLe0
Qualifier
OD600 of 1.866e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the optimized process, a liquid bacterial inoculant with an OD600 of 1.866 was obtained, with an effective viable count of 8.955 × 109 CFU/mL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1181 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A bran-based solid inoculant reached a viable count of 1.11 × 109 CFU/g.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
effective viable counte0
Value
1.11 × 109 CFU/ge0
Qualifier
bran as a substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“A solid bacterial inoculant was prepared by using bran as a substrate, and its effective viable count was 1.11 × 109 CFU/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying bacterial inoculants promoted watermelon growth.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
application of the bacterial inoculantse0
Interactor
bacterial inoculantse0symbiont
Outcome
growth of watermelone0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of the bacterial inoculants promoted the growth of watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying bacterial inoculants increased watermelon photosynthetic efficiency.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
application of the bacterial inoculantse0
Interactor
bacterial inoculantse0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of the bacterial inoculants promoted the growth of watermelon, increased the photosynthetic efficiency and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying bacterial inoculants increased watermelon yield.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
application of the bacterial inoculantse0
Interactor
bacterial inoculantse0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of the bacterial inoculants promoted the growth of watermelon, increased the photosynthetic efficiency and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying bacterial inoculants improved watermelon fruit quality.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
application of the bacterial inoculantse0
Interactor
bacterial inoculantse0symbiont
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of the bacterial inoculants promoted the growth of watermelon, increased the photosynthetic efficiency and yield, and improved fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1463 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.