Paper · 2016 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Minimization of tillage for row crops and their productivity

A. V. Alabushev; A. A. Sukharev; A. S. Popov; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The experiments were carried out in the southern part of the Rostov region in 2007-2015 on usual heavy loam chernozem. Three methods were used: moulded ploughing on 20-25 cm with plow PN-5-35; unmoulded ploughing on 20-25 cm with unit KAO-2; surface ploughing on 8-12 cm with disker AG-2.4. It was revealed that a long-term surface tillage resulted in the increase of soil density. At the beginning of the crop rotation the soil density was 1.21 g/cm3 in the layer of 10-20 cm and 20-30 cm after surface tillage, but it was 1.07 and 1.14 g/cm3 respectively after plowing. To the end of the crop rotation the soil density was 1.11-1.09 g/cm3 after deep tillage and 1.31-1.32 g/cm3 in the layer of 10-20 cm and 20-30 cm after surface tillage. Height of sunflower plants was 1.35 m and diameter of a sunflower head was 128 mm after surface tillage; sunflower plant height was 1.39 m and diameter of a sunflower head was 149 mm after deep tillage (moldboard plowing). Height of maize plants was 2.15 m after moldboard plowing and 2.00 m after surface tillage. The productivity of sunflower was 1.64 t/ha after surface tillage and 1.88 t/ha after moldboard plowing. The productivity of maize after moldboard plowing was 5.35 t/ha on average in 2014-2015 and was only 4.06 after surface tillage that was on 1.29 t/ha less. The maximum average profitability of sunflower production was 148.9% after moldboard plowing that surpasses this index on 32.8% at a long-term surface tillage. The profitability of maize production was 175.1% after moldboard plowing and only 117.3% after surface tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term surface tillage increased soil density.

Treatment
long-term surface tillagee0
Outcome
soil densitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a long-term surface tillage resulted in the increase of soil density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the start of the rotation soil density in the 10-20 and 20-30 cm layers was 1.21 g/cm3 after surface tillage versus 1.07 and 1.14 g/cm3 after plowing.

Treatment
surface tillagee0
Outcome
soil densitye0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.21 g/cm3e0
Qualifier
1.07 and 1.14 g/cm3 respectively after plowinge0
Comparator
plowinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At the beginning of the crop rotation the soil density was 1.21 g/cm3 in the layer of 10-20 cm and 20-30 cm after surface tillage, but it was 1.07 and 1.14 g/cm3 respectively after plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By the end of the rotation soil density was 1.31-1.32 g/cm3 after surface tillage versus 1.11-1.09 g/cm3 after deep tillage.

Treatment
surface tillagee0
Outcome
soil densitye0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.31-1.32 g/cm3e0
Qualifier
1.11-1.09 g/cm3e0
Comparator
deep tillagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the end of the crop rotation the soil density was 1.11-1.09 g/cm3 after deep tillage and 1.31-1.32 g/cm3 in the layer of 10-20 cm and 20-30 cm after surface tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower plant height was 1.39 m after deep moldboard tillage versus 1.35 m after surface tillage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
deep tillage (moldboard plowing)e0
Outcome
sunflower plant heighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.39 me0
Qualifier
1.35 me0
Comparator
surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height of sunflower plants was 1.35 m and diameter of a sunflower head was 128 mm after surface tillage; sunflower plant height was 1.39 m and diameter of a sunflower head was 149 mm after deep tillage (moldboard plowing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower head diameter was 149 mm after deep moldboard tillage versus 128 mm after surface tillage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
deep tillage (moldboard plowing)e0
Outcome
diameter of a sunflower heade0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
149 mme0
Qualifier
128 mme0
Comparator
surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height of sunflower plants was 1.35 m and diameter of a sunflower head was 128 mm after surface tillage; sunflower plant height was 1.39 m and diameter of a sunflower head was 149 mm after deep tillage (moldboard plowing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plant height was 2.15 m after moldboard plowing versus 2.00 m after surface tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
moldboard plowinge0
Outcome
Height of maize plantse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
2.15 me0
Qualifier
2.00 me0
Comparator
surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height of maize plants was 2.15 m after moldboard plowing and 2.00 m after surface tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower productivity was 1.88 t/ha after moldboard plowing versus 1.64 t/ha after surface tillage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
moldboard plowinge0
Outcome
productivity of sunflowere0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.88 t/hae0
Qualifier
1.64 t/hae0
Comparator
surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The productivity of sunflower was 1.64 t/ha after surface tillage and 1.88 t/ha after moldboard plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize productivity after moldboard plowing averaged 5.35 t/ha in 2014-2015 versus 4.06 after surface tillage, 1.29 t/ha less.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
moldboard plowinge0
Outcome
productivity of maizee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
5.35 t/hae0
Qualifier
only 4.06e0
Comparator
surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The productivity of maize after moldboard plowing was 5.35 t/ha on average in 2014-2015 and was only 4.06 after surface tillage that was on 1.29 t/ha less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum average profitability of sunflower production was 148.9% after moldboard plowing, surpassing long-term surface tillage by 32.8%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
moldboard plowinge0
Outcome
profitability of sunflower productione0
Direction
surpassese0
Value
148.9%e0
Qualifier
32.8%e0
Comparator
long-term surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum average profitability of sunflower production was 148.9% after moldboard plowing that surpasses this index on 32.8% at a long-term surface tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize production profitability was 175.1% after moldboard plowing versus 117.3% after surface tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
moldboard plowinge0
Outcome
profitability of maize productione0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
175.1%e0
Qualifier
117.3%e0
Comparator
surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The profitability of maize production was 175.1% after moldboard plowing and only 117.3% after surface tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1587 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

tillage · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 50 positive, 20 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.