Abstract
Barley, a versatile cereal crop, is crucial for global food security due to its adaptability to diverse climates. It serves as a vital source for human consumption and livestock feed, contributing significantly to the global food supply. However, some innovative techniques are needed to enhance nutritional aspects in order to enhance the morphological and yield traits of Barley. The basic aim of this pot study was to explore the different application methods of silicon including seed priming (0 ppm, 25 ppm, 50ppm and 75 ppm) and foliar application (0 ppm, 25 ppm, 50ppm and 75 ppm) on growth, nutritional aspects and yield traits of Barley (Sultan-17). The 0 ppm dose was considered as control. The experiment was designed under CRD and repeated three times. The results showed that foliar application of silicon @75 ppm gave best growth of Barley as compared to seed priming treatments. The N, P and K of both grains and straws were significantly increased in foliar application @75 ppm as compared with control. Similarly, the yield components of Barley including biomass and grain yield were also augmented. It is suggested to apply silicon @75ppm as a foliar for better growth and yield production of Barley.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar silicon at 75 ppm gave the best barley growth versus seed priming.
- Taxon
- Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- foliar application of silicon @75 ppme0
- Outcome
- growth of Barleye0
- Direction
- beste0
- Comparator
- seed priming treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that foliar application of silicon @75 ppm gave best growth of Barley as compared to seed priming treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application at 75 ppm significantly increased N, P and K in barley grains.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Organ / stage
- grainse0
- Treatment
- foliar application @75 ppme0
- Outcome
- N, P and Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The N, P and K of both grains and straws were significantly increased in foliar application @75 ppm as compared with control.”
t0“Barley”
e1“The results showed that foliar application of silicon @75 ppm gave best growth of Barley as compared to seed priming treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application at 75 ppm significantly increased N, P and K in barley straws.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Organ / stage
- strawse0
- Treatment
- foliar application @75 ppme0
- Outcome
- N, P and Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The N, P and K of both grains and straws were significantly increased in foliar application @75 ppm as compared with control.”
t0“Barley”
e1“The results showed that foliar application of silicon @75 ppm gave best growth of Barley as compared to seed priming treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley biomass was augmented by foliar silicon.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- foliar application of silicon @75 ppme2
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- augmentede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similarly, the yield components of Barley including biomass and grain yield were also augmented.”
e2“The results showed that foliar application of silicon @75 ppm gave best growth of Barley as compared to seed priming treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley grain yield was augmented by foliar silicon.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- foliar application of silicon @75 ppme2
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- augmentede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similarly, the yield components of Barley including biomass and grain yield were also augmented.”
e2“The results showed that foliar application of silicon @75 ppm gave best growth of Barley as compared to seed priming treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend foliar silicon at 75 ppm to improve barley growth and yield.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- silicon @75ppm as a foliare0
- Outcome
- better growth and yield productione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It is suggested to apply silicon @75ppm as a foliar for better growth and yield production of Barley.”
The same questions in other papers
silicon atom · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →silicon atom · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →application · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →application · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.