Abstract
The purpose of the research is to increase the yield of spring durum wheat grain depending on the method of tillage in the conditions of the Volga forest–steppe. The methods of tillage were studied – plowing, loosening and without autumn tillage, and quantitative indicators – the completeness of seedlings, field germination, the number of plants before harvesting, the safety and survival of plants, biological yield and grain yield of spring durum wheat, as well as the accumulation of straw mass left on the field in the conditions of the Volga forest-steppe. In the plowing variant, the highest values of germination completeness, field germination, survival and preservation of plants were obtained. In the variants with loosening and without autumn mechanical tillage, the studied indicators had lower values: field ger-mination – by 0.6 and 2.9%, germination completeness – by 0.6 and 3%, plant survival – by 2.35 and 2.21%, plant safety – by 0.7 and 1.1%, biological yield – by 2.6 and 3.9%, grain yield – by 5.2 and 10.9%, straw weight – by 4.3 and 11.2%, respectively. The studied indicators of the production process, such as the fullness of seedlings, field germination, the number of plants before harvesting, the safety and survival of plants ensured the optimal, for the prevailing weather conditions, values of biological yield and grain yield of spring durum wheat, as well as the ac-cumulation of straw mass left on the field, depending on the tillage systems – plowing by 20-22 cm, loosening by 10-12 cm and without mechanical processing in the conditions of the forest-steppe of the Volga region. The coeffi-cients of correlation of yield with quantitative indicators – field germination r = 0.63, germination completeness r = 0.71, number of plants before harvesting r = 0.57, plant survival r = 0.75, safety from germination to harvesting r = 0.58 showed a close direct relationship of signs.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Plowing gave the highest germination completeness, field germination, plant survival and plant safety.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEAT
Triticum turgidum subsp. durumt0 - Treatment
- plowing variante1
- Outcome
- germination completeness, field germination, survival and preservation of plantse1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In the plowing variant, the highest values of germination completeness, field germination, survival and preservation of plants were obtained.”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Loosening lowered field germination by 0.6%.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEATTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
- Treatment
- looseninge2
- Outcome
- field ger-minatione2
- Direction
- lowere2
- Value
- 0.6e2
- Comparator
- plowing variante1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In the plowing variant, the highest values of germination completeness, field germination, survival and preservation of plants were obtained.”
e2“In the variants with loosening and without autumn mechanical tillage, the studied indicators had lower values: field ger-mination – by 0.6 and 2.9%”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Autumn no-tillage lowered field germination by 2.9%.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEATTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
- Treatment
- without autumn mechanical tillagee2
- Outcome
- field ger-minatione2
- Direction
- lowere2
- Value
- 2.9%e2
- Comparator
- plowing variante1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In the plowing variant, the highest values of germination completeness, field germination, survival and preservation of plants were obtained.”
e2“In the variants with loosening and without autumn mechanical tillage, the studied indicators had lower values: field ger-mination – by 0.6 and 2.9%”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Field germination correlates with yield with a close direct relationship.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEATTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
- Outcome
- field germinatione3
- Direction
- directe3
- Value
- r = 0.63e3
- Comparator
- yielde3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The coeffi-cients of correlation of yield with quantitative indicators – field germination r = 0.63, germination completeness r = 0.71, number of plants before harvesting r = 0.57, plant survival r = 0.75, safety from germination to harvesting r = 0.58 showed a close direct relationship of signs.”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Germination completeness correlates with yield with a close direct relationship.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEATTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
- Outcome
- germination completenesse3
- Direction
- directe3
- Value
- r = 0.71e3
- Comparator
- yielde3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The coeffi-cients of correlation of yield with quantitative indicators – field germination r = 0.63, germination completeness r = 0.71, number of plants before harvesting r = 0.57, plant survival r = 0.75, safety from germination to harvesting r = 0.58 showed a close direct relationship of signs.”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of plants before harvesting correlates with yield with a close direct relationship.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEATTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
- Outcome
- number of plants before harvestinge3
- Direction
- directe3
- Value
- r = 0.57e3
- Comparator
- yielde3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The coeffi-cients of correlation of yield with quantitative indicators – field germination r = 0.63, germination completeness r = 0.71, number of plants before harvesting r = 0.57, plant survival r = 0.75, safety from germination to harvesting r = 0.58 showed a close direct relationship of signs.”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant survival correlates with yield with a close direct relationship.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEATTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
- Outcome
- plant survivale3
- Direction
- directe3
- Value
- r = 0.75e3
- Comparator
- yielde3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The coeffi-cients of correlation of yield with quantitative indicators – field germination r = 0.63, germination completeness r = 0.71, number of plants before harvesting r = 0.57, plant survival r = 0.75, safety from germination to harvesting r = 0.58 showed a close direct relationship of signs.”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Safety from germination to harvesting correlates with yield with a close direct relationship.
- Taxon
- SPRING DURUM WHEATTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
- Outcome
- safety from germination to harvestinge3
- Direction
- directe3
- Value
- r = 0.58e3
- Comparator
- yielde3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The coeffi-cients of correlation of yield with quantitative indicators – field germination r = 0.63, germination completeness r = 0.71, number of plants before harvesting r = 0.57, plant survival r = 0.75, safety from germination to harvesting r = 0.58 showed a close direct relationship of signs.”
t0“SPRING DURUM WHEAT BASED ON A COMPLEX OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.