Paper · 2024 · Phytopathology

Abstracts of Presentations at Plant Health 2024

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In our study targeting shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora and the prevention of fire blight canker formation, we assessed advanced preventive spray treatments.Our investigation focused on foliar spray applications, testing various rates of Reynoutria sachalinensis (giant knotweed) extract (RSE) alone and combined with Apogee, a plant growth regulator.Additionally, we examined Apogee alone, Apogee with Cueva (copper octanoate), and traditional antibiotics such as streptomycin and oxytetracycline.Applying 153.6 fl oz/A and three 32 fl oz/A of RSE on 6-year-old 'Bartlett' trees yielded significant results, achieving 78.3% to 100% control of shoot blight severity (SBS) and 76.8% to 100% control of canker incidence (CI).While other RSE rates, including the RSE-Apogee combination, demonstrated lower effectiveness, Apogee alone showed modest control.However, combining Apogee with Cueva exhibited promising results, achieving 89.4% control of SBS and 88.6% control of CI.Despite antibiotics showing 100% control, their suitability for summer application is limited due to concerns regarding antibiotic resistance.Overall, our findings suggest that applying RSE at specific rates and the Apogee-Cueva combination consistently offer effective control of shoot blight and cankers in pear trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

shoot blight severity (SBS) was controlled by RSE at the specified rates on Bartlett pear trees.

Material
'Bartlett'e7
Treatment
153.6 fl oz/A and three 32 fl oz/A of RSEe0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae7pathogen
Outcome
shoot blight severity (SBS)e0
Direction
controle0
Value
78.3% to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 153.6 fl oz/A and three 32 fl oz/A of RSE on 6-year-old 'Bartlett' trees yielded significant results, achieving 78.3% to 100% control of shoot blight severity (SBS) and 76.8% to 100% control of canker incidence (CI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–762 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

canker incidence (CI) was controlled by RSE at the specified rates on Bartlett pear trees.

Material
'Bartlett'e7
Treatment
153.6 fl oz/A and three 32 fl oz/A of RSEe0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae7pathogen
Outcome
canker incidence (CI)e0
Direction
controle0
Value
76.8% to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 153.6 fl oz/A and three 32 fl oz/A of RSE on 6-year-old 'Bartlett' trees yielded significant results, achieving 78.3% to 100% control of shoot blight severity (SBS) and 76.8% to 100% control of canker incidence (CI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–762 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other RSE rates and RSE with Apogee were less effective.

Treatment
other RSE rates, including the RSE-Apogee combinatione0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae7pathogen
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other RSE rates, including the RSE-Apogee combination, demonstrated lower effectiveness, Apogee alone showed modest control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–892 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apogee alone gave modest control.

Treatment
Apogee alonee0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae7pathogen
Outcome
controle0
Direction
modeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other RSE rates, including the RSE-Apogee combination, demonstrated lower effectiveness, Apogee alone showed modest control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–892 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apogee with Cueva controlled SBS by 89.4%.

Treatment
combining Apogee with Cuevae0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae7pathogen
Outcome
SBSe0
Direction
controle0
Value
89.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining Apogee with Cueva exhibited promising results, achieving 89.4% control of SBS and 88.6% control of CI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1013 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apogee with Cueva controlled CI by 88.6%.

Treatment
combining Apogee with Cuevae0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae7pathogen
Outcome
CIe0
Direction
controle0
Value
88.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining Apogee with Cueva exhibited promising results, achieving 89.4% control of SBS and 88.6% control of CI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1013 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibiotics gave complete control, though their summer use was judged limited by resistance concerns.

Treatment
antibioticse0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae7pathogen
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
suitability for summer application is limited due to concerns regarding antibiotic resistancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antibiotics showing 100% control, their suitability for summer application is limited due to concerns regarding antibiotic resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1155 · show in text ↑
e7

“shoot blight on young 'Bartlett' pear trees caused by Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend specific RSE rates and Apogee with Cueva for pear shoot blight and canker control.

Outcome
applying RSE at specific rates and the Apogee-Cueva combination consistently offer effective control of shoot blight and cankers in pear treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying RSE at specific rates and the Apogee-Cueva combination consistently offer effective control of shoot blight and cankers in pear trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1333 · show in text ↑

antimicrobial agent · Erwinia amylovora · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.