Paper · 2024 · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts

IMPACT OF CRUCIFER PLANT EXTRACTS ON AFLATOXIN B1-TREATED MAIZE SEEDS ON SEEDLING GROWTH

Mahesh Kumar; Gajendra Prasad

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This investigation assesses the phytotoxic effects of aflatoxin B1 on maize (Zea mays L.) seedling shoot and root growth and examines the protective potential of three crucifer plant extracts. Maize seeds treated with aflatoxin B1 exhibited significant reductions in shoot length (up to 76.47%) and root length (68.42%) at the highest concentration tested. Co-application of crucifer extracts markedly alleviated these effects, with extract C demonstrating the greatest efficacy, reducing shoot length inhibition to 44.12% and root length inhibition to 36.84%. Extracts alone slightly enhanced shoot and root lengths compared to untreated controls, suggesting a dual role as growth promoters and stress mitigators. These findings highlight the potential of crucifer extracts, particularly C, as natural interventions to enhance maize seedling resilience against aflatoxin B1 stress, offering a promising strategy for sustainable agriculture in contamination-prone regions like Bihar, India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aflatoxin B1 significantly reduced maize seedling shoot length by up to 76.47% at the highest concentration.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
aflatoxin B1e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
76.47%e0
Qualifier
at the highest concentration testede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize seeds treated with aflatoxin B1 exhibited significant reductions in shoot length (up to 76.47%) and root length (68.42%) at the highest concentration tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aflatoxin B1 significantly reduced maize seedling root length by 68.42% at the highest concentration.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
aflatoxin B1e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
68.42%e0
Qualifier
at the highest concentration testede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize seeds treated with aflatoxin B1 exhibited significant reductions in shoot length (up to 76.47%) and root length (68.42%) at the highest concentration tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applied extract C alleviated aflatoxin B1 shoot length inhibition to 44.12%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
extract Ce0
Outcome
shoot length inhibitione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
44.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-application of crucifer extracts markedly alleviated these effects, with extract C demonstrating the greatest efficacy, reducing shoot length inhibition to 44.12% and root length inhibition to 36.84%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applied extract C alleviated aflatoxin B1 root length inhibition to 36.84%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
extract Ce0
Outcome
root length inhibitione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
36.84%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-application of crucifer extracts markedly alleviated these effects, with extract C demonstrating the greatest efficacy, reducing shoot length inhibition to 44.12% and root length inhibition to 36.84%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crucifer extracts alone slightly enhanced maize shoot and root lengths compared with untreated controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Extracts alonee0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts alone slightly enhanced shoot and root lengths compared to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–647 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–89 · show in text ↑

aflatoxin B1 · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 57 positive, 10 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.