Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Biocontrol Potential of Bacillus subtilis A3 Against Corn Stalk Rot and Its Impact on Root-Associated Microbial Communities

Liming Wang; Shiqi Jia; Yue Du; et al.

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium stalk rot (FSR), a devastating soil-borne disease caused by Fusarium species, severely threatens global maize production through yield losses and mycotoxin contamination. Bacillus subtilis, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR), has shown potential as a biocontrol agent against soil-borne pathogens, but its efficacy and mechanisms against maize FSR remain poorly understood. In this study, an identified strain of B. subtilis A3 was introduced to study its biological control potential against corn stalk rot. The bacteriostatic stability of the biocontrol strain was assessed, revealing that its inhibitory activity against F. graminearum remained consistent over five consecutive generations, indicating robust bacteriostatic stability. The strain also exhibited inhibitory effects on F. verticilliodes, F. proliferalum, and other pathogenic fungi, demonstrating it has broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Indoor experiments showed that treatment with the biocontrol strain significantly increased plant height, stem diameter, and fresh weight, indicating a positive impact on corn growth. Additionally, the biocontrol strain A3 markedly reduced the lesion length of corn stalk rot, confirming its efficacy in controlling the disease. Field trials demonstrated that the growth of the A3-coated corn seeds was better than the control seeds, the control effect of FSR disease was 45.75%, and the yield increase was 3.6%. Microscopic observations revealed that the biocontrol strain A3 caused the hyphal tips of F. graminearum to swell and exhibit a beaded morphology, inhibiting normal growth. The volatile substances produced by A3 also showed significant antibacterial activity, with the antibacterial spectrum aligning with that of the biocontrol strain. Using headspace solid-phase microextraction and GC-MS, various antibacterial compounds were identified in the volatile substances. Analysis of root-associated microorganisms indicated that A3 significantly changed the microbial community composition. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed that A3-treated plants had fewer edges and lower negative correlations among bacterial communities. This study establishes the strong biocontrol potential of B. subtilis A3 against Fusarium stalk rot in corn, demonstrating its robust bacteriostatic stability, broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, positive impact on plant growth, and significant disease control efficacy, while also revealing its ability to alter root-associated microbial communities. These findings provide a foundation for further research into the mechanism of B. subtilis and its application in field biological control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 inhibition of F. graminearum remained stable for five generations.

Taxon
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0
Outcome
inhibitory activitye0
Direction
remained consistente0
Value
five consecutive generationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · TaxonScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its inhibitory activity against F. graminearum remained consistent over five consecutive generations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 inhibited F. verticilliodes.

Taxon
F. verticilliodese0
Outcome
inhibitory effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“The strain also exhibited inhibitory effects on F. verticilliodes, F. proliferalum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–841 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 inhibited F. proliferalum.

Taxon
F. proliferalume0
Outcome
inhibitory effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“The strain also exhibited inhibitory effects on F. verticilliodes, F. proliferalum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 treatment significantly increased corn height, stem diameter and fresh weight indoors.

Treatment
treatment with the biocontrol straine0
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter, and fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with the biocontrol strain significantly increased plant height, stem diameter, and fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 reduced corn stalk rot lesion length.

Treatment
biocontrol strain A3e0
Interactor
corn stalk rote0pathogen
Outcome
lesion lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biocontrol strain A3 markedly reduced the lesion length of corn stalk rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3-coated corn seeds grew better than control seeds in field trials.

Treatment
A3-coatede0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
control seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of the A3-coated corn seeds was better than the control seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 provided 45.75% control of Fusarium stalk rot in the field.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis A3t0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
control effect of FSR diseasee0
Value
45.75%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control effect of FSR disease was 45.75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1409 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium stalk rot (FSR), a devastating soil-borne disease caused by Fusarium species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol Potential of Bacillus subtilis A3 Against Corn Stalk Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 increased corn yield by 3.6% in field trials.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis A3t0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield increase was 3.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol Potential of Bacillus subtilis A3 Against Corn Stalk Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 induced swollen, beaded F. graminearum hyphal tips and inhibited growth.

Taxon
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0
Outcome
hyphal tipse0
Qualifier
beaded morphologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · TaxonScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biocontrol strain A3 caused the hyphal tips of F. graminearum to swell and exhibit a beaded morphology, inhibiting normal growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 volatiles showed significant antibacterial activity.

Taxon
A3e0
Outcome
antibacterial activitye0

Verbatim

e0

“The volatile substances produced by A3 also showed significant antibacterial activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibacterial compounds were identified among A3 volatiles.

Taxon
Bacillus subtilis A3Bacillus subtilist0
Outcome
antibacterial compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · TaxonY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various antibacterial compounds were identified in the volatile substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus subtilis A3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 significantly changed root-associated microbial community composition.

Treatment
A3e0
Outcome
microbial community compositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A3 significantly changed the microbial community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3-treated plants had fewer bacterial network edges and lower negative correlations.

Outcome
edges and lower negative correlationse0
Direction
fewere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A3-treated plants had fewer edges and lower negative correlations among bacterial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · Fusarium · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.