Abstract
A two-year field experiment was conducted at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut to evaluate the impacts of various micronutrients and their application methods on the crop growth rate and relative growth rate of wheat crop.The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with two factors and three replications.The factors used in experiment were four application methods consisting Soil Application, Seed Priming, Foliar Application and Seed Priming + Foliar Application and three micronutrients consisting manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn) and boron (B).The results revealed that among the application methods, Seed Priming + Foliar Application method produced the maximum crop growth rate of wheat during 30-60 DAS and 60-90 DAS and it was statistically at par with Seed Priming and Foliar Application methods during the 60-90 DAS, while, it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stages.However, the maximum relative growth rate of wheat crop was recorded with Seed Priming + Foliar Application method during 30-60 DAS and under Foliar Application method during 60-90 DAS, whereas, it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stage of wheat crop during both the years of experiment.Out of the micronutrients, the application of Mn produced the maximum crop growth rate of wheat crop during 30-60 DAS and 60-90 DAS and it was statistically on par with Zn application during the 60-90 DAS, but it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stage during both experimental years.Whereas, the maximum relative growth rate of wheat crop was noted by application of Mn during 30-60 DAS and with Zn application during 60-90 DAS, however, it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stages.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Combined seed priming and foliar application gave the maximum wheat crop growth rate at 30–60 and 60–90 DAS.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- 30-60 DAS and 60-90 DASe0
- Treatment
- Seed Priming + Foliar Applicatione0
- Outcome
- crop growth ratee0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed Priming + Foliar Application method produced the maximum crop growth rate of wheat during 30-60 DAS and 60-90 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
At 60–90 DAS, combined application was statistically at par with seed priming and foliar application for crop growth rate.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- 60-90 DASe0
- Treatment
- Seed Priming + Foliar Applicatione0
- Outcome
- crop growth ratet0
- Comparator
- Seed Priming and Foliar Applicatione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed Priming + Foliar Application method produced the maximum crop growth rate of wheat during 30-60 DAS and 60-90 DAS and it was statistically at par with Seed Priming and Foliar Application methods during the 60-90 DAS”
t0“CROP GROWTH RATE AND RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Application methods did not differ significantly in crop growth rate from 90 DAS to harvest.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- 90 DAS-At harvest stagese0
- Treatment
- METHODS OF APPLICATIONt0
- Outcome
- CROP GROWTH RATEt0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while, it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stages”
t0“THEIR METHODS OF APPLICATION ON CROP GROWTH RATE AND RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined application gave the maximum relative growth rate at 30–60 DAS.
- Taxon
- wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
- Organ / stage
- 30-60 DASe0
- Treatment
- Seed Priming + Foliar Applicatione0
- Outcome
- relative growth ratee0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum relative growth rate of wheat crop was recorded with Seed Priming + Foliar Application method during 30-60 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application gave the maximum relative growth rate at 60–90 DAS.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- 60-90 DASe0
- Treatment
- Foliar Applicatione0
- Outcome
- RELATIVE GROWTH RATEt0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under Foliar Application method during 60-90 DAS”
t0“RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Application methods did not significantly differ in relative growth rate from 90 DAS to harvest.
- Taxon
- wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
- Organ / stage
- 90 DAS-At harvest stagee0
- Treatment
- METHODS OF APPLICATIONt0
- Outcome
- RELATIVE GROWTH RATEt0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stage of wheat crop during both the years of experiment”
t0“METHODS OF APPLICATION ON CROP GROWTH RATE AND RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Manganese application produced the maximum crop growth rate at 30–60 and 60–90 DAS.
- Taxon
- wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
- Organ / stage
- 30-60 DAS and 60-90 DASe0
- Treatment
- application of Mne0
- Outcome
- crop growth ratee0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of Mn produced the maximum crop growth rate of wheat crop during 30-60 DAS and 60-90 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
Manganese and zinc applications gave statistically similar crop growth rates at 60–90 DAS.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- 60-90 DASe0
- Treatment
- MICRONUTRIENTSt0
- Outcome
- CROP GROWTH RATEt0
- Comparator
- Zn applicatione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was statistically on par with Zn application during the 60-90 DAS”
t0“THE DIFFERENT MICRONUTRIENTS AND THEIR METHODS OF APPLICATION ON CROP GROWTH RATE AND RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient effects on crop growth rate were not significant from 90 DAS to harvest.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- 90 DAS-At harvest stagee0
- Treatment
- MICRONUTRIENTSt0
- Outcome
- CROP GROWTH RATEt0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stage during both experimental years”
t0“THE DIFFERENT MICRONUTRIENTS AND THEIR METHODS OF APPLICATION ON CROP GROWTH RATE AND RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Manganese application gave the maximum relative growth rate at 30–60 DAS.
- Taxon
- wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
- Organ / stage
- 30-60 DASe0
- Treatment
- application of Mne0
- Outcome
- relative growth ratee0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum relative growth rate of wheat crop was noted by application of Mn during 30-60 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application gave the maximum relative growth rate at 60–90 DAS.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- 60-90 DASe0
- Treatment
- Zn applicatione0
- Outcome
- RELATIVE GROWTH RATEt0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with Zn application during 60-90 DAS”
t0“RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient effects on relative growth rate were not significant from 90 DAS to harvest.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- 90 DAS-At harvest stagese0
- Treatment
- MICRONUTRIENTSt0
- Outcome
- RELATIVE GROWTH RATEt0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“however, it was non-significant during 90 DAS-At harvest stages.”
t0“MICRONUTRIENTS AND THEIR METHODS OF APPLICATION ON CROP GROWTH RATE AND RELATIVE GROWTH RATE OF WHEAT CROP”
The same questions in other papers
manganese atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
196 papers more in this group
See all 200 papers →micronutrient · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
289 papers more in this group
See all 293 papers →application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
303 papers more in this group
See all 307 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.