Paper · 2024 · PLANT ARCHIVES

EFFECT OF ORGANIC NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY CROP, NUTRIENT DEPLETION BY WEEDS AND ECONOMICS OF RAPESEED

9
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out at the Instructional-cum Research Farm, Assam Agricultural University during the rabi season of 2018-19 in order to assess the effect of organic nutrient amendments on nutrient uptake by crops, depletion by weeds and the economics.The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with eleven different treatments of organic management along with one control plot.Results revealed that the maximum nutrient uptake by crop was observed under the treatment receiving vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (54.450N kg/ha, 12.230 P kg/ha and 24.397K kg/ha) being statistically at par with the treatment of FYM 5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (52.403N kg/ha, 11.783 P kg/ha and 24.427K kg/ha).Considerably, the highest nutrient depletion by weeds were observed under the control plots (1.213 N kg/ha, 0.740 P kg/ha and 1.113 K kg/ha) over all the treatments.In terms of economics, the treatment vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha recorded the highest gross return (Rs.108880/ha) while the net return was maximum under FYM 5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (Rs.55660/ha), both being closely followed by each other.Contrarily, the highest benefit-cost ratio (B: C) was observed under FYM @10 t/ha (2.600).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vermicompost combination maximized crop nitrogen uptake at 54.450N kg/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Treatment
vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/hae0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by crope0
Direction
maximume0
Value
54.450N kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum nutrient uptake by crop was observed under the treatment receiving vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (54.450N kg/ha, 12.230 P kg/ha and 24.397K kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vermicompost combination maximized crop phosphorus uptake at 12.230 P kg/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Treatment
vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/hae0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by crope0
Direction
maximume0
Value
12.230 P kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum nutrient uptake by crop was observed under the treatment receiving vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (54.450N kg/ha, 12.230 P kg/ha and 24.397K kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vermicompost combination had crop potassium uptake of 24.397K kg/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Treatment
vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/hae0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by crope1
Value
24.397K kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (54.450N kg/ha, 12.230 P kg/ha and 24.397K kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum nutrient uptake by crop was observed under the treatment receiving vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (54.450N kg/ha, 12.230 P kg/ha and 24.397K kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–629 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots had the highest weed nutrient depletion, with nitrogen at 1.213 N kg/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Outcome
nutrient depletion by weedse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.213 N kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“highest nutrient depletion by weeds were observed under the control plots (1.213 N kg/ha, 0.740 P kg/ha and 1.113 K kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots had weed phosphorus depletion of 0.740 P kg/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Outcome
nutrient depletion by weedse0
Value
0.740 P kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“highest nutrient depletion by weeds were observed under the control plots (1.213 N kg/ha, 0.740 P kg/ha and 1.113 K kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots had weed potassium depletion of 1.113 K kg/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Outcome
nutrient depletion by weedse0
Value
1.113 K kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“highest nutrient depletion by weeds were observed under the control plots (1.213 N kg/ha, 0.740 P kg/ha and 1.113 K kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vermicompost combination produced the highest gross return, Rs.108880/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.108880/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost 2.5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha recorded the highest gross return (Rs.108880/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM combination produced the maximum net return, Rs.55660/ha.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs.55660/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“net return was maximum under FYM 5 t/ha + poultry manure 2.5 t/ha + mustard oil cake 1 t/ha (Rs.55660/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 10 t/ha produced the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.600.

Taxon
RAPESEEDt0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.600e0

Verbatim

e0

“highest benefit-cost ratio (B: C) was observed under FYM @10 t/ha (2.600)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“RAPESEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.