Paper · 2003 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Irrigation with plant extracts in ecofarming increases biomass production and mineral and organic nitrogen content of plants

Gerhard Gramss; Klaus‐Dieter Voigt; Hans Bergmann

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot (PE, 9.84 g dry weight l –1 ) or a solution of Ca, K, Mg, P, and NO 3 ‐N salts (SS) in a concentration similar to that in PE, for 31–48 days. In comparison to water‐irrigated controls, both SS and PE treated plants showed nearly equal increases in shoot dry weight (29–40 %), whereas PE‐treated plants had higher fresh weights (38–84 %) due to increased succulence. Treatment with SS did not enhance, but sometimes even reduce, the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, and several trace elements in shoot tissues. In contrast, PE‐treated plants had higher Ca, K, Mg, and organic N, but lower As and Ni contents and were thus of higher nutritive value. Reduced contents of metals in plant tissue correlated with their reduced solubility in the soil solution, which was not due to changes in pH. Fertilizer components such as K and Mg (metals of lower exchange intensity) were incorporated into the soil to release Ca, Sr, and Ba (metals of higher exchange intensity) and reduce the solubility of most trace elements and metal‐complexing humic substances. In addition, application of Ca precipitated heavy metals and humic complexes directly from the soil solution. This effect was partially overcome by PE. Its carboxylic acids could act as phytochelators of metal ions and as mobilizers of the highly diffusible humic substances which carry metals to roots. It is concluded that continuous PE application replaces the quantities of Ca, K, Mg, P, and organic N, but not of NO 3 ‐N consumed during plant growth. Using PE does not add any relevant quantities of toxic metals to the plant‐soil system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea-shoot extract irrigation increased shoot dry weight of the seedlings by 29–40% relative to water controls.

Treatment
aqueous extract of pea shoote0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte2
Direction
increasese2
Value
29–40 %e2
Qualifier
nearly equale2
Comparator
controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e2

“both SS and PE treated plants showed nearly equal increases in shoot dry weight (29–40 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“In comparison to water‐irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-solution irrigation (SS) increased shoot dry weight of the seedlings by 29–40% relative to water controls, nearly equal to pea-shoot extract.

Treatment
SSe2
Outcome
shoot dry weighte2
Direction
increasese2
Value
29–40 %e2
Qualifier
nearly equale2
Comparator
controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e2

“both SS and PE treated plants showed nearly equal increases in shoot dry weight (29–40 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“In comparison to water‐irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea-shoot extract irrigation gave higher fresh weights of the seedlings, by 38–84%, due to increased succulence.

Treatment
aqueous extract of pea shoote0
Outcome
fresh weightse1
Direction
highere1
Value
38–84 %e1
Qualifier
due to increased succulencee1
Comparator
controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“had higher fresh weights (38–84 %) due to increased succulence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–495 · show in text ↑
e3

“In comparison to water‐irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea-shoot extract irrigation gave higher Ca, K, Mg and organic N contents in the seedlings.

Treatment
aqueous extract of pea shoote0
Outcome
Ca, K, Mg, and organic Ne4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“In comparison to water‐irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e4

“had higher Ca, K, Mg, and organic N, but lower As and Ni contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea-shoot extract irrigation gave lower As and Ni contents in the seedlings.

Treatment
aqueous extract of pea shoote0
Outcome
As and Ni contentse4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“In comparison to water‐irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e4

“had higher Ca, K, Mg, and organic N, but lower As and Ni contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-solution irrigation did not enhance Ca, K, Mg and several trace element concentrations and sometimes reduced them.

Treatment
SSe5
Outcome
concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, and several trace elementse5
Direction
did not enhancee5
Qualifier
sometimes even reducee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e5

“Treatment with SS did not enhance, but sometimes even reduce, the concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, and several trace elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–618 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower metal contents in plant tissue were associated with lower metal solubility in the soil solution.

Organ / stage
plant tissuee6
Outcome
contents of metals in plant tissuee6
Direction
Reducede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e6

“Reduced contents of metals in plant tissue correlated with their reduced solubility in the soil solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–879 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous pea-shoot extract application replaces the Ca, K, Mg, P and organic N consumed by plants during growth.

Outcome
quantities of Ca, K, Mg, P, and organic Ne7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e7

“continuous PE application replaces the quantities of Ca, K, Mg, P, and organic N, but not of NO 3 ‐N consumed during plant growth. Using PE does not add any relevant quantities of toxic metals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1694 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea-shoot extract use does not add relevant quantities of toxic metals to the plant-soil system.

Treatment
Using PEe7
Outcome
quantities of toxic metalse7
Direction
does not adde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
e7

“continuous PE application replaces the quantities of Ca, K, Mg, P, and organic N, but not of NO 3 ‐N consumed during plant growth. Using PE does not add any relevant quantities of toxic metals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1694 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

34 papers: 9 positive, 25 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

botanical · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

101 papers: 42 positive, 59 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

botanical · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 22 positive, 43 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.