Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pea-shoot extract irrigation gave lower As and Ni contents in the seedlings.

A claim from Irrigation with plant extracts in ecofarming increases biomass production and mineral and organic nitrogen content of plants · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea-shoot extract irrigation gave lower As and Ni contents in the seedlings.

Treatment
aqueous extract of pea shoote0
Outcome
As and Ni contentse4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
controlse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of alfalfa, rape, spinach, and wheat, potted on sandy soil, were irrigated with an aqueous extract of pea shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130
e3

“In comparison to water‐irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314
e4

“had higher Ca, K, Mg, and organic N, but lower As and Ni contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–733

Title

Irrigation with plant extracts in ecofarming increases biomass production and mineral and organic nitrogen content of plants

Gerhard Gramss; Klaus‐Dieter Voigt; Hans Bergmann Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2003. doi:10.1002/jpln.200320265

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2e56afecc4e1a594990ca6e838bae7ab97d3a2446ec65d3ba4af8c61fb587468 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

botanical · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.