Paper · 2025 · Journal of Fungi

The Effect of Different Types of Fertilizers on the Growth of Cassava and the Fungal Community in Rhizosphere Soil

Qinyun Liu; Xiaojing Lu; Chunyu Xiang; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

With the growing importance of cassava worldwide, developing efficient and eco-friendly fertilizer strategies is crucial for sustainable cassava production. Diverse fertilizer treatments can significantly influence soil properties and plant growth. In this study, we investigated the effects of three fertilizer treatments-organic fertilizer (OF), chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (CFOF), and reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (RFOF)-on the fungal community structure, chemical properties (SOM, AP, AN, and AK), and enzyme activities (NP, SC, CAT, and UE) in cassava rhizosphere. Our results demonstrated that these fertilizer treatments significantly enhanced cassava growth and yield compared to the control (CK) without fertilization. Soil chemical properties (SOM, AN, AP, and AK) and enzyme activities (NP, SC, CAT, and UE) were notably improved following fertilization. High-throughput sequencing revealed the significant alterations in the relative abundance of specific fungal taxa. Environmental parameters, particularly UE, SC, CAT, and AP, showed strong correlations with fungal community structure. These findings highlight the critical role of combined organic and chemical fertilizers in promoting cassava productivity and soil health. Understanding these interactions provides a foundation for optimizing fertilization practices to enhance crop yields and support sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer improved cassava growth and yield over no fertilization.

Treatment
organic fertilizer (OF)e1
Outcome
cassava growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the control (CK) without fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these fertilizer treatments significantly enhanced cassava growth and yield compared to the control (CK) without fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic fertilizer (OF), chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (CFOF), and reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (RFOF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical plus organic fertilizer improved cassava growth and yield over no fertilization.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (CFOF)e1
Outcome
cassava growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the control (CK) without fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these fertilizer treatments significantly enhanced cassava growth and yield compared to the control (CK) without fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic fertilizer (OF), chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (CFOF), and reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (RFOF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced chemical plus organic fertilizer improved cassava growth and yield over no fertilization.

Treatment
reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (RFOF)e1
Outcome
cassava growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the control (CK) without fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these fertilizer treatments significantly enhanced cassava growth and yield compared to the control (CK) without fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic fertilizer (OF), chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (CFOF), and reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer (RFOF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization improved soil organic matter and nutrient properties in the cassava rhizosphere.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
Soil chemical properties (SOM, AN, AP, and AK)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil chemical properties (SOM, AN, AP, and AK) and enzyme activities (NP, SC, CAT, and UE) were notably improved following fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization improved cassava rhizosphere soil enzyme activities.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
enzyme activities (NP, SC, CAT, and UE)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil chemical properties (SOM, AN, AP, and AK) and enzyme activities (NP, SC, CAT, and UE) were notably improved following fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization significantly changed the relative abundance of specific cassava rhizosphere fungal taxa.

Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse1
Outcome
relative abundance of specific fungal taxae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High-throughput sequencing revealed the significant alterations in the relative abundance of specific fungal taxa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“Diverse fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–186 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil enzyme and phosphorus parameters correlated strongly with cassava rhizosphere fungal community structure.

Compound
APe0
Outcome
fungal community structuree0
Qualifier
UE, SC, CAT, and APe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Environmental parameters, particularly UE, SC, CAT, and AP, showed strong correlations with fungal community structure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.