Paper · 2025 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Preharvest Spraying of Calcium Chloride, Chitosan, and their Combination Effects on Tomato Growth, Yield, Fruit Characteristics, and Quality

Hasnaa M. Abdelaleem; Mohamed H.Z. EL-Dkeshy; Reham M. Abdalla

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Postharvest losses are a great obstacle that reduces tomato production in many developing countries, including Egypt. Research was carried out to evaluate the effects of pre-harvest treatments on growth, fruit yield, quality, and fruit characteristics of tomato; variety ‘Nora 765’. The experiment comprised four spraying treatments, viz., control (without spraying), calcium chloride (CaCl2 1.5%), chitosan 1.5%, and a combination of chitosan 1.5% + CaCl2 1.5%, sprayed either foliar (F) or at Green Mature Fruits stage (GM). Foliar spraying with CaCl2 gave the tallest plants and the widest stems. Also, CaCl2 treated plants sprayed at either F or GM had higher fruit numbers than most of the treatments. Spraying the foliage with CaCl2 gave significantly the highest fruit yield in the experiments and showed a lower fruit weight loss than the control in most of the days. In the first season only, plants’ foliar sprayed with CaCl2, chitosan, and mix treatments had better visual appearance and hardness than control fruits after 12 days of storage. Foliar spraying with chitosan had lower microbial fungi than the control. Flavonoids, and total phenolic contents were higher in all GM spraying treatments than the control. However, lycopene was lower in all foliar sprayed treatments than the control. It could be concluded that, under these experimental conditions, CaCl2 was the best treatment for tomato growth and yield and for improving fruit visual appearance, firmness, and delaying skin color development, while foliar chitosan can be used for better postharvest fruit characteristics only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar calcium chloride produced the tallest plants and widest stems.

Treatment
Foliar spraying with CaCl2e0
Outcome
tallest plants and the widest stemse0
Direction
talleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying with CaCl2 gave the tallest plants and the widest stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride at foliar or green mature stage increased fruit number relative to most treatments.

Treatment
CaCl2 treated plants sprayed at either F or GMe0
Outcome
fruit numberse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
most of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl2 treated plants sprayed at either F or GM had higher fruit numbers than most of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar calcium chloride yielded the most fruit, significantly.

Treatment
Spraying the foliage with CaCl2e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying the foliage with CaCl2 gave significantly the highest fruit yield in the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar calcium chloride reduced fruit weight loss relative to control on most days.

Treatment
CaCl2e1
Outcome
fruit weight losse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
most of the dayse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed a lower fruit weight loss than the control in most of the days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Calcium Chloride, Chitosan, and their Combination Effects on Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying the foliage with CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-season foliar CaCl2 improved stored fruit visual appearance and hardness versus control.

Treatment
CaCl2e0
Outcome
visual appearance and hardnesse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storagee0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season only, plants’ foliar sprayed with CaCl2, chitosan, and mix treatments had better visual appearance and hardness than control fruits after 12 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-season foliar chitosan improved stored fruit visual appearance and hardness versus control.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
visual appearance and hardnesse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storagee0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season only, plants’ foliar sprayed with CaCl2, chitosan, and mix treatments had better visual appearance and hardness than control fruits after 12 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-season foliar mix treatments improved stored fruit visual appearance and hardness versus control.

Treatment
mix treatmentse0
Outcome
visual appearance and hardnesse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storagee0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season only, plants’ foliar sprayed with CaCl2, chitosan, and mix treatments had better visual appearance and hardness than control fruits after 12 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar chitosan reduced microbial fungi relative to control.

Treatment
Foliar spraying with chitosane0
Outcome
microbial fungie0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying with chitosan had lower microbial fungi than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All green mature spraying treatments increased flavonoids and total phenolics over control.

Treatment
all GM spraying treatmentse0
Outcome
Flavonoids, and total phenolic contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavonoids, and total phenolic contents were higher in all GM spraying treatments than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar spray treatments reduced lycopene relative to control.

Treatment
all foliar sprayed treatmentse0
Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lycopene was lower in all foliar sprayed treatments than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

transgenic · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 52 positive, 6 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

application · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

296 papers: 261 positive, 35 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

292 papers more in this group

See all 296 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.