Paper · 2025 · BMC Plant Biology

Exploring drought tolerance for germination traits of diverse wheat genotypes at seedling stage: a multivariate analysis approach

Kashif Ahmed; Ghulam Shabbir; Mukhtar Ahmed

18
claims
32
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Wheat holds crucial global importance as a staple food in many regions. Drought stress significantly impedes seed germination of wheat. The lack of drought-tolerant wheat varieties hampers wheat production, especially in arid regions of the world. This study investigated seed germination and seedling growth in eighty wheat genotypes under moisture stress stimulated by polyethylene glycol (PEG6000). The study included two osmotic potentials induced by PEG-20% (ψ: -0.491 MPa) and PEG-25% (ψ: -0.735 MPa), as well as a control set without PEG. The data showed that dehydration caused by polyethylene glycol generally had an adverse effect on the morphological characteristics of wheat seedlings by causing substantial losses during the early germination stage. The results acquired from analysis of variance explained highly significant variances (p < 0.01) across genotypes (G), PEG-Treatments (TPEG), and interactions between genotypes and PEG-Treatments (G x TPEG) for all observed variables. Moisture deficit radically affected all studied seedling traits of bread wheat under rising osmotic stress, with germination percentage (GP), shoot length (SL), root length (RL), coleoptile length (CL), seedling length (SDL), root fresh weight (FRW), root dry weight (DRW), shoot fresh weight (FSW), shoot dry weight (DSW), seedling biomass (SBM) and seedling vigor index (SVI) reduced by about 30–95% compared to control (PEG-0%) to the maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPa. The coefficient of relative inhibition (CRI) rose in response to osmotic stress, demonstrating growth inhibition. Boxplots demonstrated a considerable decline under stress, although scatter plots and correlation matrices revealed significant positive associations for most seedling traits, except CRI. The histograms for most variables showed a wider value range and more diversified distribution patterns. Principal component analysis (PCA) and genotype by trait biplot emphasized that PC1 represented 94.29% of the cumulative variation, with an eigenvalue of 11.31 out of 12 components. The heatmap displayed diverse genotype and trait characteristics, indicating higher values for drought resistance and lower values for susceptibility in genotype performance. As indicated by a range of multivariate analyses, the wheat lines NR-499, NARC-2009 and Pakistan-2013 stood out as the most drought-tolerant among the genotypes; whereas Borlaug-2016, NR-514 and NR-516 were found to be highly susceptible, whereas SBM, SDL, SVI and CRI have been found key indicators for subsequent screening. These tolerant wheat lines offer promising potential for developing drought-tolerant varieties that could thrive in arid regions, thereby strengthening wheat production in water-stressed environments. Integrating these findings into breeding programs is crucial for realizing the potential of drought-tolerant wheat varieties in transforming global wheat production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG dehydration adversely affected early wheat seedling morphology and germination.

Treatment
polyethylene glycole0
Outcome
morphological characteristics of wheat seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dehydration caused by polyethylene glycol generally had an adverse effect on the morphological characteristics of wheat seedlings by causing substantial losses during the early germination stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–761 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly across all measured wheat seedling variables.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
all observed variablese0
Value
p < 0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highly significant variances (p < 0.01) across genotypes (G), PEG-Treatments (TPEG), and interactions between genotypes and PEG-Treatments (G x TPEG) for all observed variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG treatments differed significantly across all measured wheat seedling variables.

Treatment
PEG-Treatments (TPEG)e0
Outcome
all observed variablese0
Value
p < 0.01e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highly significant variances (p < 0.01) across genotypes (G), PEG-Treatments (TPEG), and interactions between genotypes and PEG-Treatments (G x TPEG) for all observed variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype-by-PEG interactions were significant across all measured variables.

Material
genotypese0
Treatment
PEG-Treatmentse0
Outcome
all observed variablese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes and PEG-Treatments (G x TPEG) for all observed variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum PEG stress reduced wheat germination percentage and seedling lengths by about 30–95% against controls.

Treatment
maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPae0
Outcome
germination percentage (GP), shoot length (SL), root length (RL)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 30–95%e0
Comparator
control (PEG-0%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination percentage (GP), shoot length (SL), root length (RL), coleoptile length (CL), seedling length (SDL), root fresh weight (FRW), root dry weight (DRW), shoot fresh weight (FSW), shoot dry weight (DSW), seedling biomass (SBM) and seedling vigor index (SVI) reduced by about 30–95% compared to control (PEG-0%) to the maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum PEG stress reduced coleoptile and overall seedling length by about 30–95%.

Treatment
maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPae0
Outcome
coleoptile length (CL), seedling length (SDL)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 30–95%e0
Comparator
control (PEG-0%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coleoptile length (CL), seedling length (SDL), root fresh weight (FRW), root dry weight (DRW), shoot fresh weight (FSW), shoot dry weight (DSW), seedling biomass (SBM) and seedling vigor index (SVI) reduced by about 30–95% compared to control (PEG-0%) to the maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum PEG stress reduced root and shoot fresh and dry weights by about 30–95%.

Treatment
maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPae0
Outcome
root fresh weight (FRW), root dry weight (DRW)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 30–95%e0
Comparator
control (PEG-0%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root fresh weight (FRW), root dry weight (DRW), shoot fresh weight (FSW), shoot dry weight (DSW), seedling biomass (SBM) and seedling vigor index (SVI) reduced by about 30–95% compared to control (PEG-0%) to the maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum PEG stress reduced shoot weights, biomass and vigor index by about 30–95%.

Treatment
maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPae0
Outcome
shoot fresh weight (FSW), shoot dry weight (DSW)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 30–95%e0
Comparator
control (PEG-0%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot fresh weight (FSW), shoot dry weight (DSW), seedling biomass (SBM) and seedling vigor index (SVI) reduced by about 30–95% compared to control (PEG-0%) to the maximum induced osmotic stress at -0.735 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative inhibition increased under osmotic stress.

Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
coefficient of relative inhibition (CRI)e0
Direction
rosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coefficient of relative inhibition (CRI) rose in response to osmotic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most wheat seedling traits had significant positive associations, except CRI.

Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Outcome
positive associations for most seedling traitse0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
except CRIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“correlation matrices revealed significant positive associations for most seedling traits, except CRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1782 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC1 accounted for 94.29% of cumulative variation with eigenvalue 11.31.

Outcome
cumulative variatione0
Value
94.29%e0
Qualifier
eigenvalue of 11.31 out of 12 componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PC1 represented 94.29% of the cumulative variation, with an eigenvalue of 11.31 out of 12 components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1969–2069 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR-499 was among the most drought-tolerant wheat lines.

Material
NR-499e0
Outcome
most drought-tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat lines NR-499, NARC-2009 and Pakistan-2013 stood out as the most drought-tolerant among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2300–2406 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NARC-2009 was among the most drought-tolerant wheat lines.

Material
NARC-2009e0
Outcome
most drought-tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat lines NR-499, NARC-2009 and Pakistan-2013 stood out as the most drought-tolerant among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2300–2406 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pakistan-2013 was among the most drought-tolerant wheat lines.

Material
Pakistan-2013e0
Outcome
most drought-tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat lines NR-499, NARC-2009 and Pakistan-2013 stood out as the most drought-tolerant among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2300–2406 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borlaug-2016 was highly drought-susceptible.

Material
Borlaug-2016e0
Outcome
highly susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Borlaug-2016, NR-514 and NR-516 were found to be highly susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2416–2483 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR-514 was highly drought-susceptible.

Material
NR-514e0
Outcome
highly susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Borlaug-2016, NR-514 and NR-516 were found to be highly susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2416–2483 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR-516 was highly drought-susceptible.

Material
NR-516e0
Outcome
highly susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Borlaug-2016, NR-514 and NR-516 were found to be highly susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2416–2483 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SBM, SDL, SVI and CRI were identified as screening indicators.

Outcome
key indicators for subsequent screeninge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SBM, SDL, SVI and CRI have been found key indicators for subsequent screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2493–2570 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑

drought · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.