Paper · 2026 · Plants

Chitosan and Microalgae Nanoparticles: Synergistic Role in Enhancing Drought Stress Tolerance in Wheat Seedlings

Fatemeh Gholizadeh; Agampodi Gihan S. D. De Silva; Asish Samuel; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the most severe abiotic constraints limiting wheat productivity worldwide, particularly during early developmental stages that determine crop establishment and yield potential. Sustainable, biologically based strategies that enhance drought tolerance without environmental cost are therefore urgently needed. In this study, we evaluated the individual and combined effects of chitosan (Cs), microalgae (Ma) (Nostoc linckia, MACC-612), and a chitosan–microalgae nanoparticle formulation (Cs-Ma) on germination performance, early seedling growth, and molecular stress responses in two wheat (Mehregan and MV Nádor) cultivars with contrasting drought sensitivity under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced osmotic stress (−2 and −4 MPa). Drought stress significantly reduced germination percentage, germination rate, and radicle and coleoptile development in both cultivars, especially at −4 MPa. Application of Cs and microalgae individually partially alleviated these negative effects; however, the combined Cs-Ma treatment consistently produced the strongest improvements in seedling vigor and biomass accumulation under both moderate and severe drought stress. Evaluation of drought tolerance using tolerance index (TOL), stress tolerance index (STI), and stress intensity (SI) demonstrated that Cs-Ma markedly increased STI and reduced SI across most germination traits, indicating enhanced drought tolerance and lower stress sensitivity, particularly in MV Nádor. These physiological responses were supported by transcriptional reprogramming in radicle tissues, including upregulation of genes involved in polyamine biosynthesis (TaSPDS, TaSAMDC), phenylpropanoid metabolism (TaPAL), and protein protection (TaHSP70), along with moderated induction of polyamine catabolism (TaPXPAO). Overall, the results reveal a synergistic interaction between chitosan nanoparticles and microalgae biomass, highlighting Cs-Ma as an effective, eco-friendly biostimulant for improving early-stage drought tolerance in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-induced drought significantly reduced wheat germination percentage and rate, and radicle and coleoptile development, especially at −4 MPa.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
germination percentage, germination rate, and radicle and coleoptile developmente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
especially at −4 MPae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced germination percentage, germination rate, and radicle and coleoptile development in both cultivars, especially at −4 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan alone partially alleviated drought effects in wheat seedlings.

Treatment
Cse0
Outcome
negative effectse0
Direction
partially alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Cs and microalgae individually partially alleviated these negative effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microalgae alone partially alleviated drought effects in wheat seedlings.

Treatment
microalgaee0
Outcome
negative effectse0
Direction
partially alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Cs and microalgae individually partially alleviated these negative effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Cs-Ma treatment gave the strongest improvements in seedling vigor and biomass under moderate and severe drought.

Treatment
combined Cs-Ma treatmente0
Outcome
seedling vigor and biomass accumulatione0
Direction
strongest improvementse0
Qualifier
under both moderate and severe drought stresse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the combined Cs-Ma treatment consistently produced the strongest improvements in seedling vigor and biomass accumulation under both moderate and severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cs-Ma increased stress tolerance index across most germination traits, particularly in MV Nádor.

Material
MV Nádore0
Treatment
Cs-Mae0
Outcome
STIe0
Direction
markedly increasede0
Qualifier
across most germination traitse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cs-Ma markedly increased STI and reduced SI across most germination traits, indicating enhanced drought tolerance and lower stress sensitivity, particularly in MV Nádor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cs-Ma reduced stress intensity across most wheat germination traits.

Treatment
Cs-Mae0
Outcome
SIe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cs-Ma markedly increased STI and reduced SI across most germination traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cs-Ma treatment upregulated TaSPDS and TaSAMDC in wheat radicles.

Gene
TaSPDS, TaSAMDCe0
Outcome
upregulation of genes involved in polyamine biosynthesise0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“upregulation of genes involved in polyamine biosynthesis (TaSPDS, TaSAMDC), phenylpropanoid metabolism (TaPAL), and protein protection (TaHSP70), along with moderated induction of polyamine catabolism (TaPXPAO).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cs-Ma treatment upregulated TaPAL and TaHSP70 in wheat radicles.

Gene
TaPALe0
Outcome
phenylpropanoid metabolisme0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“phenylpropanoid metabolism (TaPAL), and protein protection (TaHSP70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cs-Ma moderated TaPXPAO induction in wheat radicles.

Gene
TaPXPAOe0
Outcome
polyamine catabolisme0
Direction
moderated inductione0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“moderated induction of polyamine catabolism (TaPXPAO)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1807 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.