Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences

Optimizing Dryland Agriculture: Intercropping Corn and Superior Rice Varieties in Maluku, Indonesia

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Dryland agriculture faces significant challenges, particularly in tropical regions like Indonesia, due to climate variability and the gradual decline in productive land.One potential solution to enhance agricultural efficiency in these areas is the practice of intercropping.This study examines an engineered management approach that involves intercropping superior maize varieties with high-yielding upland rice varieties to optimize land use and productivity.The experiment was conducted at the Makariki Experimental Garden of the Food Crops Research Center, Maluku, from May to September 2020, using a Randomized Block Design with five treatments and five replications.The intercropping treatments consisted of maize (Nasa 29) combined with five different upland rice varieties: (1) Inpago 8, (2) Inpago 11, (3) Inpago 12, (4) Rindang 1, and (5) Rindang 2. For comparison, monoculture plots of maize (Nasa 29) and monoculture plots of the respective upland rice varieties were also evaluated.Results indicated that intercropping significantly increased maize productivity by 142% compared to monoculture systems.However, upland rice productivity declined by 72% under intercropping conditions.Despite this reduction, all five upland rice varieties (Inpago 8, Inpago 11, Inpago 12, Rindang 1, and Rindang 2) demonstrated suitability for intercropping with maize, as the system improved overall land productivity.The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) values ranged from 2.11 to 2.45, indicating an increase in dryland productivity by 111-145% compared to monoculture cultivation.These findings confirm that intercropping maize with high-yielding upland rice varieties enhances both land use efficiency and overall crop yield productivity.This approach presents a viable strategy for optimizing dryland agriculture, making better use of available resources while sustaining productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased maize productivity by 142% versus monoculture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
maize productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
142%e0
Comparator
monoculture systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping significantly increased maize productivity by 142% compared to monoculture systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased upland rice productivity by 72%.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
intercropping conditionse0
Outcome
upland rice productivitye0
Direction
declinede0
Value
72%e0
Comparator
monoculturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice productivity declined by 72% under intercropping conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“For comparison, monoculture plots of maize (Nasa 29) and monoculture plots of the respective upland rice varieties were also evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five upland rice varieties were considered suitable for intercropping with maize.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Material
Inpago 8, Inpago 11, Inpago 12, Rindang 1, and Rindang 2e0
Outcome
suitability for intercropping with maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all five upland rice varieties (Inpago 8, Inpago 11, Inpago 12, Rindang 1, and Rindang 2) demonstrated suitability for intercropping with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratios ranged from 2.11 to 2.45.

Outcome
Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)e0
Value
2.11 to 2.45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) values ranged from 2.11 to 2.45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping Corn and Superior Rice Varieties in Maluku, Indonesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased dryland productivity by 111-145% versus monoculture.

Treatment
Intercroppingt0
Outcome
dryland productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
111-145%e0
Comparator
monoculture cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in dryland productivity by 111-145% compared to monoculture cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping Corn and Superior Rice Varieties in Maluku, Indonesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–99 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

95 papers: 77 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.