Abstract
India has recognized the value of applying micronutrients to boost crop production, and it is becoming clear that doing so is necessary if high yielding wheat varieties and NPK fertilizers are to provide their full potential. The availability of some specific mineral nutrients that are absolutely necessary for a plant to complete its life cycle determines its development and production. The disorder of micronutrients appears to be the most pervasive and frequent issue in crop production globally, leading to significant losses in yield and nutritional value. The experimental site lies approximately in the center of north Gangetic alluvial plain, on the left bank of river Yamuna at the distant of about 65 km in north from Hamirpur. The data obtained on yield (grain yield, straw yield and biological yield) of wheat was significant difference of all treatments over control. All treatment is significantly superior from control. Different dose nitrogen, zinc and iron management showed variation in the yield. Seems at over all treatment effect, it is evident that treatment (175% N + Zn + Fe) showed maximum grain yield followed by treatment (T6-150% N + Zn + Fe).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The treatments differed significantly from control for wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The data obtained on yield (grain yield, straw yield and biological yield) of wheat was significant difference of all treatments over control. All treatment is significantly superior from control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatments differed significantly from control for wheat straw yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The data obtained on yield (grain yield, straw yield and biological yield) of wheat was significant difference of all treatments over control. All treatment is significantly superior from control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatments differed significantly from control for wheat biological yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The data obtained on yield (grain yield, straw yield and biological yield) of wheat was significant difference of all treatments over control. All treatment is significantly superior from control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 175% N + Zn + Fe treatment produced maximum grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 175% N + Zn + Fee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- T6-150% N + Zn + Fee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“treatment (175% N + Zn + Fe) showed maximum grain yield followed by treatment (T6-150% N + Zn + Fe)”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.