Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Optimizing Spray Technology and Nitrogen Sources for Wheat Grain Protein Enhancement

S. O. Abiola; R. Sharry; J. Bushong; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increasing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain protein concentration (GPC) without excessive nitrogen (N) inputs requires understanding the interactions between N source characteristics and application technology parameters. This study evaluated the effects of foliar N applications at anthesis on wheat grain yield and GPC across three locations over three growing seasons in Oklahoma. Treatments consisted of two N sources (urea-ammonium nitrate [UAN] and aqueous urea [Aq. urea]), three nozzle types (flat fan [FF], 3D, and twin [TW]), and two droplet types (fine and coarse). Late foliar applications increased GPC by 12% without affecting grain yield (0.5–5.8 Mg ha−1). During the 2020–21 growing season, a late season freeze during anthesis resulted in no significant differences in GPC across locations. UAN produced significantly higher GPC (13.7%) than Aq. urea (13.1%). Among nozzle types, the 3D nozzle consistently produced the highest GPC (13.8%), compared to FF (13.1%) and TW nozzles (13.2%). Two-way interactions revealed UAN with fine droplets achieved consistently high GPC (14.6%), as did Aq. urea with coarse droplets (14.5%) at Lake Carl Blackwell in 2021–22 as compared to Aq. Urea_Fine (13.8%). At Chickasha 2021–22 and Perkins 2020–21, a significant three-way interaction was observed, with the UAN_3D_Fine (13.2%) and UAN_3D_Coarse (12.2%) treatments producing the highest GPC, with 8% and 15% greater than the Aq. Urea_TW_Fine, respectively, which is lowest. These findings provide a foundation for precision agriculture approaches that optimize foliar N application parameters to enhance wheat quality while maintaining sustainable production practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late foliar nitrogen applications increased wheat grain protein concentration by 12%.

Treatment
Late foliar applicationse3
Outcome
GPCe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
12%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“Late foliar applications increased GPC by 12% without affecting grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late foliar nitrogen applications did not change wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Late foliar applicationse3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
without affectinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“Late foliar applications increased GPC by 12% without affecting grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN gave higher wheat grain protein concentration (13.7%) than aqueous urea.

Treatment
UANe4
Outcome
GPCe4
Direction
highere4
Value
13.7%e4
Comparator
Aq. ureae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e4

“UAN produced significantly higher GPC (13.7%) than Aq. urea (13.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3D nozzle gave the highest wheat grain protein concentration (13.8%) compared with the flat fan nozzle.

Treatment
3D nozzlee5
Outcome
GPCe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
13.8%e5
Qualifier
TW nozzles (13.2%)e5
Comparator
FFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among nozzle types, the 3D nozzle consistently produced the highest GPC (13.8%), compared to FF (13.1%) and TW nozzles (13.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1005 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN with fine droplets achieved consistently high wheat grain protein concentration (14.6%).

Treatment
UAN with fine dropletse6
Outcome
GPCe6
Value
14.6%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e6

“Two-way interactions revealed UAN with fine droplets achieved consistently high GPC (14.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous urea with coarse droplets achieved 14.5% grain protein concentration at Lake Carl Blackwell in 2021–22, compared with fine droplets.

Treatment
Aq. urea with coarse dropletse7
Outcome
GPCe6
Value
14.5%e7
Comparator
Aq. Urea_Finee7
Setting
Lake Carl Blackwelle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e6

“Two-way interactions revealed UAN with fine droplets achieved consistently high GPC (14.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1098 · show in text ↑
e7

“as did Aq. urea with coarse droplets (14.5%) at Lake Carl Blackwell in 2021–22 as compared to Aq. Urea_Fine (13.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN with 3D nozzle and fine droplets gave the highest wheat grain protein concentration (13.2%), 8% above Aq. urea with twin nozzle and fine droplets, in a three-way interaction.

Treatment
UAN_3D_Finee2
Outcome
GPCe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
8%e2
Comparator
Aq. Urea_TW_Finee2
Setting
Chickasha 2021–22 and Perkins 2020–21e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the UAN_3D_Fine (13.2%) and UAN_3D_Coarse (12.2%) treatments producing the highest GPC, with 8% and 15% greater than the Aq. Urea_TW_Fine, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1465 · show in text ↑
e3

“At Chickasha 2021–22 and Perkins 2020–21, a significant three-way interaction was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN with 3D nozzle and coarse droplets gave high wheat grain protein concentration (12.2%), 15% above Aq. urea with twin nozzle and fine droplets, in a three-way interaction.

Treatment
UAN_3D_Coarsee2
Outcome
GPCe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
15%e2
Comparator
Aq. Urea_TW_Finee2
Setting
Chickasha 2021–22 and Perkins 2020–21e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the UAN_3D_Fine (13.2%) and UAN_3D_Coarse (12.2%) treatments producing the highest GPC, with 8% and 15% greater than the Aq. Urea_TW_Fine, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1465 · show in text ↑
e3

“At Chickasha 2021–22 and Perkins 2020–21, a significant three-way interaction was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A late-season freeze during anthesis produced no significant differences in wheat grain protein concentration across locations in 2020–21.

Treatment
late season freeze during anthesise4
Outcome
GPCe4
Direction
no significant differencese4
Setting
2020–21 growing seasone4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–39 · show in text ↑
e4

“During the 2020–21 growing season, a late season freeze during anthesis resulted in no significant differences in GPC across locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–808 · show in text ↑

climate site · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cold · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 6 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.