Paper · 2025 · Journal of Ecological Engineering

Enhancing wheat resistance to salinity: The role of gibberellic acid and β-Carotene in morphological, yielding and ionic adaptations

Mudassar Nadeem; Muhammad Shahbaz; Farooq Ahmad; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity is highly toxic to wheat growth.Both -carotene and gibberellic acid can mitigate the saline toxicity in wheat, independently and in combined form, by positively impacting growth and yield under saline conditions.To explore our hypothesis two wheat varieties (Faisalabad-2008 and Galaxy-2013) were grown in the sand medium under two levels of salinity (0 mM and 150 mM) nourished with Hoagland's solution and sprayed with four different foliar approaches (water spray = T 0 , 0.75 mM GA 3 = T 1 , 0.25 mM -carotene = T 2 , 0.75 mM GA 3 + 0.25 mM -carotene = T 3 ).Salinity comprehensively decreased the growth metrics of wheat.While foliar applications of 0.75 mM GA 3 0.25 mM -carotene significantly mitigate this toxicity by physiological alterations.Shoot fresh weight (p < 0.001) (maximum at T 3 , root fresh weight (p < 0.05) maximum at T 2 , Shoot dry weight (p < 0.01) maximum at T 3 reflect significant mitigation under salinity while root dry weight, shoot length, and root length non-significant response.Leaf calcium (p < 0.01) and root sodium (p < 0.001) readings showed much positive response at T 3 .Flavonoids (p < 0.05) maximum at T 3 , free proline (p < 0.01) maximum at T 3 , ascorbic acid (p < 0.05) maximum at T 3, and seeds weight (p < 0.001) Maximum at T 1 .Overall Faisalabad-2008 performed better in saline conditions when treated with foliar application of GA 3 and -carotene (water spray = T 0 , 0.75 mM GA 3 = T 1 , 0.25 mM -carotene = T 2 , 0.75 mM GA 3 + 0.25 mM -carotene = T 3 ).This study is recommended for the growth of wheat cultivars by foliar applications of GA 3 and -carotene under salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased wheat growth metrics.

Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
growth metricse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity comprehensively decreased the growth metrics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight, shoot length and root length did not respond significantly.

Outcome
root dry weight, shoot length, and root lengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight, shoot length, and root length non-significant response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faisalabad-2008 performed better under salinity with combined foliar treatment.

Material
Faisalabad-2008e0
Treatment
foliar application of GA 3 and -carotenee0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Setting
saline conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faisalabad-2008 performed better in saline conditions when treated with foliar application of GA 3 and -carotene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar GA3 and carotene for wheat growth under salt stress.

Outcome
growth of wheat cultivars by foliar applications of GA 3 and -carotene under salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommended for the growth of wheat cultivars by foliar applications of GA 3 and -carotene under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1640 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.