Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the Student Instrumental Form of C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur-208002 (U.P.) during rabi 2022-2023 to the see response of seed treatment and methods of sowing in wheat under late sown condition. Results revealed that the seed treatments with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods gave significantly higher growth attributes viz. Plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, number of tillers/m2, productive tillers/m2 and unproductive tillers/m2over rest seed treatment and sowing methods. The highest all observed yield attributes, yield viz. Seed yield of 49.23 and 45.75 q/ha and straw yield of 64.11 and 58.33 q/ha; maximum economic viz. Net return of Rs. 50588and Rs. 60852/ha and B:C ratio of 1.62 and 1.75 were obtained with seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods over seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowing (Rs. 37874 and Rs. 54622/ha and B:C ratio of 1.19 and 1.57) and. The response of seed treatment sowing in line were found significant in respect of tillers/m2 and productive tillers/m2 at maturity stage of crop over rest treatment in both methods of sowing, respectively. The seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing line gave significantly higher all yield attributes and yields viz. Grain yield (47.98 and 47.98 q/ha), straw yield (59.73 and 59.24 q/ha), economics viz. Net return of Rs. 46226 and Rs. 62002/ha and B:C ratio of 1.50 and 1.78 than seed treatments like dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solution sowing in both methods, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing gave significantly higher growth attributes than the other seed treatments and sowing methods.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methodse1
- Outcome
- growth attributese1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- rest seed treatment and sowing methodse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“the seed treatments with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods gave significantly higher growth attributes viz. Plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, number of tillers/m2, productive tillers/m2 and unproductive tillers/m2over rest seed treatment and sowing methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing gave seed yield of 49.23 and 45.75 q/ha, the highest observed.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methodse1
- Outcome
- Seed yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 49.23 and 45.75 q/hae2
- Comparator
- 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“the seed treatments with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods gave significantly higher growth attributes viz. Plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, number of tillers/m2, productive tillers/m2 and unproductive tillers/m2over rest seed treatment and sowing methods”
e2“The highest all observed yield attributes, yield viz. Seed yield of 49.23 and 45.75 q/ha and straw yield of 64.11 and 58.33 q/ha”
e3“maximum economic viz. Net return of Rs. 50588and Rs. 60852/ha and B:C ratio of 1.62 and 1.75 were obtained with seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods over seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing gave straw yield of 64.11 and 58.33 q/ha, the highest observed.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methodse1
- Outcome
- straw yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 64.11 and 58.33 q/hae2
- Comparator
- 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“the seed treatments with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods gave significantly higher growth attributes viz. Plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, number of tillers/m2, productive tillers/m2 and unproductive tillers/m2over rest seed treatment and sowing methods”
e2“The highest all observed yield attributes, yield viz. Seed yield of 49.23 and 45.75 q/ha and straw yield of 64.11 and 58.33 q/ha”
e3“maximum economic viz. Net return of Rs. 50588and Rs. 60852/ha and B:C ratio of 1.62 and 1.75 were obtained with seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods over seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing gave the maximum net return, Rs. 50588 and Rs. 60852/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methodse3
- Outcome
- Net returne3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- Rs. 50588and Rs. 60852/hae3
- Comparator
- seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e3“maximum economic viz. Net return of Rs. 50588and Rs. 60852/ha and B:C ratio of 1.62 and 1.75 were obtained with seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods over seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing gave the maximum B:C ratio, 1.62 and 1.75.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methodse3
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- 1.62 and 1.75e3
- Comparator
- seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowinge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e3“maximum economic viz. Net return of Rs. 50588and Rs. 60852/ha and B:C ratio of 1.62 and 1.75 were obtained with seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in line sowing methods over seed treatment with 0.5% zinc solution in broadcasting methods of sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment sowing in line significantly affected tillers/m2 and productive tillers/m2 at the maturity stage compared with the rest treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- maturity stagee6
- Treatment
- seed treatment sowing in linee6
- Outcome
- tillers/m2 and productive tillers/m2e6
- Comparator
- rest treatment in both methods of sowinge6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e6“The response of seed treatment sowing in line were found significant in respect of tillers/m2 and productive tillers/m2 at maturity stage of crop over rest treatment in both methods of sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and line sowing gave the highest grain yield, 47.98 and 47.98 q/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing linee7
- Outcome
- Grain yielde7
- Direction
- highere7
- Value
- 47.98 and 47.98 q/hae7
- Comparator
- dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solutione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e7“The seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing line gave significantly higher all yield attributes and yields viz. Grain yield (47.98 and 47.98 q/ha), straw yield (59.73 and 59.24 q/ha)”
e0“economics viz. Net return of Rs. 46226 and Rs. 62002/ha and B:C ratio of 1.50 and 1.78 than seed treatments like dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solution sowing in both methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and line sowing gave the higher straw yield, 59.73 and 59.24 q/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing linee7
- Outcome
- straw yielde7
- Direction
- highere7
- Value
- 59.73 and 59.24 q/hae7
- Comparator
- dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solutione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e7“The seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing line gave significantly higher all yield attributes and yields viz. Grain yield (47.98 and 47.98 q/ha), straw yield (59.73 and 59.24 q/ha)”
e0“economics viz. Net return of Rs. 46226 and Rs. 62002/ha and B:C ratio of 1.50 and 1.78 than seed treatments like dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solution sowing in both methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and line sowing gave higher net return, Rs. 46226 and Rs. 62002/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing linee7
- Outcome
- Net returne0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- Rs. 46226 and Rs. 62002/hae0
- Comparator
- dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solutione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e7“The seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing line gave significantly higher all yield attributes and yields viz. Grain yield (47.98 and 47.98 q/ha), straw yield (59.73 and 59.24 q/ha)”
e0“economics viz. Net return of Rs. 46226 and Rs. 62002/ha and B:C ratio of 1.50 and 1.78 than seed treatments like dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solution sowing in both methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and line sowing gave higher B:C ratio, 1.50 and 1.78.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing linee7
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 1.50 and 1.78e0
- Comparator
- dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solutione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e7“The seed treatment with 0.5% zinc sulphate and sowing line gave significantly higher all yield attributes and yields viz. Grain yield (47.98 and 47.98 q/ha), straw yield (59.73 and 59.24 q/ha)”
e0“economics viz. Net return of Rs. 46226 and Rs. 62002/ha and B:C ratio of 1.50 and 1.78 than seed treatments like dry seed, water soaked seed, sprouted seeds, 2% salt solution, 0.2% urea solution sowing in both methods”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
196 papers more in this group
See all 200 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
297 papers more in this group
See all 301 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.