Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Assessing Jatropha curcas pollen viability: a comparative assessment of transgenic and non-transgenic pollen under various environmental conditions using rapid staining technique

Sampath Kasthurirengan; Yan Hong; Srinivasan Ramachandran

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: ) is a promising biofuel crop, offers an opportunity to study pollen biology, particularly in transgenic lines. Understanding pollen viability under different environmental conditions is essential for assessing potential risks associated with transgenic Jatropha cultivation. Methods: Pollen viability of X8#34 transgenic and non-transgenic Jatropha was assessed using various staining techniques. An optimized double-staining technique with Fluorescein Diacetate (FDA) and Propidium Iodide (PI) was developed, effectively differentiated viable pollen (green fluorescence) from non-viable (red fluorescence). The effects of temperatures (18°C, 28°C, 30°C 35°C, 40°C and 45°C) and UV-B irradiation (3 to 15 W/m2) on pollen viability ware examined. Additionally, viability was assessed under field-relevant conditions, including sunny and cloudy/shady atmospheric environments. Results: A significant reduction in pollen viability was observed under extreme temperature and UV-B stress. Among different temperatures tested, high temperatures (35°C, 40°C and 45°C) led to a significant decline in pollen viability, with notable differences emerging from 15 min of incubation. Additionally, exposure to high-intensity UV-B irradiation (12 W/m2 and 15 W/m2) significantly reduced the pollen viability. Under a field relevant sunny condition, viability dropped to 19% in transgenic and 16% in non-transgenic after 45 min incubation and complete loss was recorded in 90 min in both genotypes. In cloudy/shady conditions, over 97% of pollen lost viability in 240 min incubation. Statistical analysis confirmed no significant difference is pollen viability between X8#34 and non-transgenic Jatropha across all tested conditions. Discussion: This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of pollen viability in transgenic and non-transgenic Jatropha. The findings highlight the significant influence of environmental factors, particularly temperature and UV-B exposure, on pollen longevity. The optimized double staining technique (FDA + PI) provides a reliable method for assessing pollen viability and may be useful in environmental risk evaluations of transgenic Jatropha. Given the rapid decline in pollen viability under field-relevant conditions, the likelihood of transgene flow via pollen appears limited.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized FDA and PI double staining distinguished viable green-fluorescent from non-viable red-fluorescent pollen.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
pollene0
Outcome
differentiated viable pollene0
Comparator
non-viablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An optimized double-staining technique with Fluorescein Diacetate (FDA) and Propidium Iodide (PI) was developed, effectively differentiated viable pollen (green fluorescence) from non-viable (red fluorescence).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extreme temperature significantly reduced Jatropha pollen viability.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
extreme temperaturee0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction in pollen viability was observed under extreme temperature and UV-B stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B stress significantly reduced Jatropha pollen viability.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
UV-B stresse0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction in pollen viability was observed under extreme temperature and UV-B stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperatures of 35°C, 40°C and 45°C significantly reduced pollen viability, with differences appearing after 15 minutes.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
high temperatures (35°C, 40°C and 45°C)e0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
from 15 min of incubatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among different temperatures tested, high temperatures (35°C, 40°C and 45°C) led to a significant decline in pollen viability, with notable differences emerging from 15 min of incubation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-intensity UV-B at 12 and 15 W/m2 significantly reduced pollen viability.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
high-intensity UV-B irradiation (12 W/m2 and 15 W/m2)e0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, exposure to high-intensity UV-B irradiation (12 W/m2 and 15 W/m2) significantly reduced the pollen viability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunny conditions reduced transgenic pollen viability to 19% after 45 minutes.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Material
transgenice0
Treatment
sunny conditione0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
droppede0
Value
19%e0
Qualifier
after 45 min incubatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under a field relevant sunny condition, viability dropped to 19% in transgenic and 16% in non-transgenic after 45 min incubation and complete loss was recorded in 90 min in both genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunny conditions reduced non-transgenic pollen viability to 16% after 45 minutes.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Material
non-transgenice0
Treatment
sunny conditione0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
droppede0
Value
16%e0
Qualifier
after 45 min incubatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under a field relevant sunny condition, viability dropped to 19% in transgenic and 16% in non-transgenic after 45 min incubation and complete loss was recorded in 90 min in both genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenic pollen completely lost viability by 90 minutes in sunny conditions.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Material
transgenice0
Treatment
sunny conditione0
Outcome
complete losse0
Value
90 mine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under a field relevant sunny condition, viability dropped to 19% in transgenic and 16% in non-transgenic after 45 min incubation and complete loss was recorded in 90 min in both genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-transgenic pollen completely lost viability by 90 minutes in sunny conditions.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Material
non-transgenice0
Treatment
sunny conditione0
Outcome
complete losse0
Value
90 mine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under a field relevant sunny condition, viability dropped to 19% in transgenic and 16% in non-transgenic after 45 min incubation and complete loss was recorded in 90 min in both genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over 97% of pollen lost viability after 240 minutes in cloudy or shady conditions.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
cloudy/shady conditionse0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
loste0
Value
over 97%e0
Qualifier
240 min incubatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In cloudy/shady conditions, over 97% of pollen lost viability in 240 min incubation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability did not differ significantly between X8#34 and non-transgenic Jatropha across tested conditions.

Taxon
JatrophaJatrophae0
Material
X8#34e0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0
Qualifier
across all tested conditionse0
Comparator
non-transgenice0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha
Jatropha · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Neelix at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical analysis confirmed no significant difference is pollen viability between X8#34 and non-transgenic Jatropha across all tested conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1733 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid field-condition viability loss suggests limited likelihood of pollen-mediated transgene flow.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Outcome
likelihood of transgene flow via pollene0
Qualifier
rapid decline in pollen viability under field-relevant conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Given the rapid decline in pollen viability under field-relevant conditions, the likelihood of transgene flow via pollen appears limited.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2189–2326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.