Paper · 2025 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Growth Performance of Mustard and Chickpea under Different Intercropping Patterns and Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels in North-Western India

Yogesh; Sarvjeet Kukreja; Rachna; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Agriculture is a vital economic activity in India’s economy, vital to India’s economy, benefits from intercropping techniques like mustard and chickpea cultivation. This method enhances soil fertility through chickpea’s nitrogen fixation and reduces fertilizer needs. Effective crop management involves optimizing plant growth parameters, which significantly influences yield and economic returns. This experiment employed a Randomized Block Design with 8 treatments having 3 replications to evaluate intercropping strategies between mustard and chickpea. The treatments included sole crops with recommended rates of fertilizers (RDF), and various intercropping ratios and nitrogen levels: Mustard sole (T1), Chickpea sole (T2), Mustard + Chickpea (3:1) with 100 kg/ha (T3), 75 kg/ha (T4), and 50 kg/ha (T5), as well as Mustard + Chickpea (4:2) with 100 kg/ha (T6), 75 kg/ha (T7), and 50 kg/ha (T8). Exactly after 90 days of sowing, mustard plant heights ranged from a maximum of 198 cm in T6 to a minimum of 175.13 cm in T8. For chickpea, T3 achieved the highest height of 41.37 cm, while T5 had the lowest at 34.49 cm. The highest dry matter yield for mustard and chickpea was recorded in T3, showing improvements of 11.83% and 51.18%, respectively, compared to sole crops. The T6 and T3 also achieved the highest chlorophyll indices for mustard and chickpea, respectively. Yield results shows that the 3:1 ratio with 100 kg N/ha produced the highest mustard equivalent yield of 19.26 q/ha, whereas lower nitrogen levels reduced both yields and benefit-cost ratios. Overall, intercropping treatments, particularly with optimal nitrogen levels, enhanced both crop productivity and profitability compared to sole crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard height peaked at 198 cm in T6.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
T6e0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
198 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“mustard plant heights ranged from a maximum of 198 cm in T6 to a minimum of 175.13 cm in T8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard height was lowest at 175.13 cm in T8.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
175.13 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“mustard plant heights ranged from a maximum of 198 cm in T6 to a minimum of 175.13 cm in T8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea height peaked at 41.37 cm in T3.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.37 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For chickpea, T3 achieved the highest height of 41.37 cm, while T5 had the lowest at 34.49 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea height was lowest at 34.49 cm in T5.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
34.49 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For chickpea, T3 achieved the highest height of 41.37 cm, while T5 had the lowest at 34.49 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 increased mustard dry matter yield by 11.83% versus sole crop.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
11.83%e0
Comparator
sole cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest dry matter yield for mustard and chickpea was recorded in T3, showing improvements of 11.83% and 51.18%, respectively, compared to sole crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 increased chickpea dry matter yield by 51.18% versus sole crop.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
51.18%e0
Comparator
sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest dry matter yield for mustard and chickpea was recorded in T3, showing improvements of 11.83% and 51.18%, respectively, compared to sole crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave mustard the highest chlorophyll index.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
T6e0
Outcome
chlorophyll indicese0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“The T6 and T3 also achieved the highest chlorophyll indices for mustard and chickpea, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1375 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 gave chickpea the highest chlorophyll index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
chlorophyll indicese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T6 and T3 also achieved the highest chlorophyll indices for mustard and chickpea, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3:1 intercrop with 100 kg N/ha gave the highest mustard-equivalent yield, 19.26 q/ha.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
3:1 ratio with 100 kg N/hae0
Outcome
mustard equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
19.26 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the 3:1 ratio with 100 kg N/ha produced the highest mustard equivalent yield of 19.26 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen reduced crop yields.

Treatment
lower nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lower nitrogen levels reduced both yields and benefit-cost ratios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen reduced benefit-cost ratios.

Treatment
lower nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratiose0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lower nitrogen levels reduced both yields and benefit-cost ratios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1567 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.