Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Stress Tolerance in Sugar Beet under Various Drought Stress Cycles

Lama Loho; Nandita Jena; Saroj Kumar Mohanty; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Drought stress is one of the most common and important environmental factors affecting crop growth and production. Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is a temperate halophyte crop, but it is sensitive to water scarcity, which can reduce its growth and yield. Methods: To study the performance of tropical sugar beet under water deficit conditions, a pot experiment was conducted in January to May 2021, using a completely randomized design with three replicates. First and second cycles of drought stress were imposed on seven-week-old sugar beet plants (LS-6 tropical variety). The first phase of stress involved with 5, 10, 15 and 20 days of irrigation withholding to 8 treatments, followed by 15 days of normal watering. Then, half of the treatments were subjected to a second cycle of drought by imposing 3 days of stress. Drought effects were studied in terms of growth, physiological, biochemical and yield characteristics. Result: Water deficit hampered plant growth by reducing leaf area and leaf area index. A marked decrease in relative water content and chlorophyll stability index was also observed. Proline and total soluble carbohydrate content increased compared to the control, while starch content was decreased. However, after 15 days of watering under the second duration of stress, all parameters recovered against control, with a slight effect compared to single-stressed treatments. Yield reduction was observed under severe stress 20 days water withholding, whereas the drought effect was not significant on the harvest index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced leaf area and leaf area index.

Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
leaf area and leaf area indexe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit hampered plant growth by reducing leaf area and leaf area index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased relative water content and chlorophyll stability index.

Treatment
Water deficite1
Outcome
relative water content and chlorophyll stability indexe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A marked decrease in relative water content and chlorophyll stability index was also observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit hampered plant growth by reducing leaf area and leaf area index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and total soluble carbohydrate content increased relative to control.

Treatment
Water deficite1
Outcome
Proline and total soluble carbohydrate contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline and total soluble carbohydrate content increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit hampered plant growth by reducing leaf area and leaf area index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch content decreased relative to control.

Treatment
Water deficite1
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while starch content was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit hampered plant growth by reducing leaf area and leaf area index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 15 days of watering under the second stress duration, all parameters recovered against control.

Treatment
15 days of watering under the second duration of stresse0
Outcome
all parameterse0
Direction
recoverede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 15 days of watering under the second duration of stress, all parameters recovered against control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe 20 day water withholding reduced yield.

Treatment
severe stress 20 days water withholdinge0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield reduction was observed under severe stress 20 days water withholding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought had no significant effect on harvest index.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the drought effect was not significant on the harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

drought · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

37 papers: 8 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 6 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.