Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Effect of Hydropriming on Seedling Growth of Different Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) Landraces

Anne Linda Chisa; Takudzwa Mandizvo; Alfred Odindo; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) is a drought-tolerant, underutilised legume with the potential to improve food security, but its slow, uneven germination due to hard seed coats constrains cultivation. This study investigated the effects of hydropriming (0, 12, 24, and 36 h) on the seed imbibition, emergence, and early seedling growth in four landraces (NW, Nov4, ARC, and 519) under greenhouse conditions. The results showed genotype-specific variation in the water uptake, with Genotype 519 exhibiting the highest water imbibition (17.31%) at 36 h, while NW displayed slower but steadier hydration (13.51%). These differences reflect contrasting seed coat permeability and hydration strategies, which influenced the subsequent emergence patterns. Hydropriming significantly reduced the time to emergence (50% emergence by Day 5 in NW) and increased the seedling vigour. After 9 days of growth, the shoot length increased from 7.8 cm to 12.7 cm, the root length from 11.6 cm to 18.1 cm, and the dry mass from 0.38 g to 0.67 g. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant effects (p < 0.01) of the genotype, the priming duration, and their interaction on traits such as the root length, dry mass, and root-to-shoot ratio. PCA identified the whole-plant dry mass, root dry mass, and root-to-shoot ratio as key contributors to performance. Pearson correlation showed a strong positive association (r = 1.0, p < 0.001) between the priming duration and seedling biomass, although the extended imbibition time may partially explain this trend. Hydropriming, particularly for 36 h, showed promise in promoting early growth, indicating that it is a favourable low-cost intervention. Field-level validation is recommended to assess the practical scalability under diverse environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landrace 519 had the highest water imbibition, 17.31%, at 36 h.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Material
Genotype 519e0
Outcome
water imbibitione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.31%e0
Qualifier
36 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype 519 exhibiting the highest water imbibition (17.31%) at 36 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–568 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NW showed slower but steadier hydration of 13.51%.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Material
NWe0
Outcome
hydratione0
Direction
slowere0
Value
13.51%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NW displayed slower but steadier hydration (13.51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–627 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming significantly reduced time to emergence; NW reached 50% emergence by Day 5.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Material
NWe0
Treatment
Hydropriminge0
Outcome
time to emergencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50% emergence by Day 5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydropriming significantly reduced the time to emergence (50% emergence by Day 5 in NW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming increased seedling vigour.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Treatment
Hydropriminge0
Outcome
seedling vigoure0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydropriming significantly reduced the time to emergence (50% emergence by Day 5 in NW) and increased the seedling vigour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length rose from 7.8 to 12.7 cm after 9 days.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.8 cm to 12.7 cme0
Qualifier
After 9 days of growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 9 days of growth, the shoot length increased from 7.8 cm to 12.7 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length rose from 11.6 to 18.1 cm after nine days.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae2
Outcome
root lengthe0
Value
11.6 cm to 18.1 cme0
Qualifier
After 9 days of growthe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root length from 11.6 cm to 18.1 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 9 days of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–913 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry mass rose from 0.38 to 0.67 g after nine days.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae2
Outcome
dry masse0
Value
0.38 g to 0.67 ge0
Qualifier
After 9 days of growthe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry mass from 0.38 g to 0.67 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1045 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 9 days of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–913 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype, priming duration and their interaction significantly affected root length, dry mass and root-to-shoot ratio.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Treatment
priming duratione0
Outcome
root length, dry mass, and root-to-shoot ratioe0
Qualifier
genotype, the priming duration, and their interactione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant effects (p < 0.01) of the genotype, the priming duration, and their interaction on traits such as the root length, dry mass, and root-to-shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA identified whole-plant dry mass, root dry mass and root-to-shoot ratio as key performance contributors.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Organ / stage
whole-plante0
Outcome
performancee0
Qualifier
whole-plant dry mass, root dry mass, and root-to-shoot ratioe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PCA identified the whole-plant dry mass, root dry mass, and root-to-shoot ratio as key contributors to performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming duration correlated positively with seedling biomass (r = 1.0).

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Treatment
priming duratione0
Outcome
seedling biomasse0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 1.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong positive association (r = 1.0, p < 0.001) between the priming duration and seedling biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1490 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors considered 36 h hydropriming promising for early growth.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Outcome
Hydropriming, particularly for 36 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydropriming, particularly for 36 h, showed promise in promoting early growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1641 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommended field validation of hydropriming scalability under diverse conditions.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae1
Outcome
Field-level validatione0
Qualifier
diverse environmental conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field-level validation is recommended to assess the practical scalability under diverse environmental conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.