Abstract
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of nano-fertilizers and gluconates on fruit set and yield of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Banganpalli at Fruit Research station, Sangareddy, Telangana. The experiment was carried out with factorial randomized block design with two factors and 15 treatments, first factor includes macronutrients nano N and K with different concentrations (M1-Nano N&K -2ml/l, M2- Nano N&K -4ml/l and M3-KNO3-10g/l) and second factor includes micronutrients in the form of nano and gluconates at different concentrations (N1- Nano Zn+Fe+B+Mg-2ml/l, N2- Nano Zn+Fe+B+Mg-4ml/l, N3- Zn+Fe+B+Mg gluconates-2ml/l, N4- Zn+Fe+B+Mg gluconates-4ml/l and N5- Micronutrient's mix-2g/l). Selected mango trees were foliar sprayed twice with all the nutrients before flowering and at marble stage. Among different concentrations of nano N and K, nano N & K-2ml/l (M1) has resulted in 36% significantly increased fruit yield which might be due to increased fruit set (6.58%), fruit weight (386.8 g) and number of fruits/tree (151.1) compared to KNO3-10g/l (M3) followed by nano N & K-4ml/l (M2) and least was recorded by KNO3-10g/l (M3). Among micro-nutrients (Zn+Fe+B+Mg), nano (Zn+Fe+B+Mg)-2ml/l (N1) has resulted in 12.7% significantly increased fruit yield which might be due to increased fruit set (6.14%), and number of fruit tree-1 (136.0) compared to N5- micronutrient’s mix and least was recorded by N5-micronutrient’s mix. Among interactions nano N&K-2 ml/l + nano Zn+Fe+B+Mg)-2ml/l (M1N1) has resulted in 51% significantly higher yield which might be due to increased fruit set (6.81%), fruit weight (424.3 g) and number of fruit tree-1 (161.6) compared to (M3N5) followed by M1N4 - nano N & K at 2ml/l along with (Zn+Fe+B+Mg) gluconates and least was recorded by M3N5 - KNO3-10g/l and micro-nutrient mix.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Nano N and K at 2 ml/l increased mango fruit yield by 36% versus KNO3 at 10 g/l.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- nano N & K-2ml/le0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 36%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“nano N & K-2ml/l (M1) has resulted in 36% significantly increased fruit yield”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano N and K at 2 ml/l increased mango fruit set to 6.58%.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.58%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased fruit set (6.58%)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano N and K at 2 ml/l increased mango fruit weight to 386.8 g.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Value
- 386.8 ge0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit weight (386.8 g)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano N and K at 2 ml/l increased fruit number to 151.1 per tree.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- number of fruits/treee0
- Value
- 151.1e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fruits/tree (151.1)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano Zn, Fe, B and Mg at 2 ml/l increased mango fruit yield by 12.7%.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- nano (Zn+Fe+B+Mg)-2ml/le0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 12.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nano (Zn+Fe+B+Mg)-2ml/l (N1) has resulted in 12.7% significantly increased fruit yield”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano micronutrients increased mango fruit set to 6.14%.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.14%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased fruit set (6.14%)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano micronutrients increased fruit number to 136.0 per tree.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- number of fruit tree-1e0
- Value
- 136.0e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fruit tree-1 (136.0)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined nano macronutrients and micronutrients increased mango yield by 51%.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- nano N&K-2 ml/l + nano Zn+Fe+B+Mg)-2ml/le0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 51%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nano N&K-2 ml/l + nano Zn+Fe+B+Mg)-2ml/l (M1N1) has resulted in 51% significantly higher yield”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nano treatment increased mango fruit set to 6.81%.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.81%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased fruit set (6.81%)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nano treatment increased mango fruit weight to 424.3 g.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Value
- 424.3 ge0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit weight (424.3 g)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nano treatment increased mango fruit number to 161.6 per tree.
- Taxon
- mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- number of fruit tree-1e0
- Value
- 161.6e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fruit tree-1 (161.6)”
t0“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →iron atom · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.