Paper · 2004 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Heat and Drought Influence Photosynthesis, Water Relations, and Soluble Carbohydrates of Two Ecotypes of Redbud (Cercis canadensis)

Jason J. Griffin; Thomas G. Ranney; D. Mason Pharr

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Net photosynthesis (Pn) of two ecotypes of redbud ( Cercis canadensis L.) was studied following growth under high temperatures and increasing drought. Although mexican redbud [ C. canadensis var. mexicana (Rose) M. Hopkins] exhibited greater Pn than eastern redbud ( C. canadensis var. canadensis L.), Pn decreased at a similar rate under water deficit stress for both ecotypes. Mexican redbud also had greater instantaneous water use efficiency [net photosynthesis: transpiration (WUE)] than eastern redbud. Differences in both Pn and WUE might have been due to differences in leaf thickness. The optimum temperature for potential photosynthetic capacity (37 °C) was unaffected by irrigation or ecotype. Tissue osmotic potential at full turgor was more negative in eastern redbud, but was unaffected by drought stress in either ecotype. Soluble carbohydrate content was higher in eastern redbud, and in both ecotypes, d -pinitol was the major soluble carbohydrate and was considerably more abundant in the water-stressed plants. Total polyol content (myo-inositol + ononitol + pinitol) was also greater in the water-stressed plants. Both ecotypes were very tolerant of high temperatures and drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mexican redbud had greater net photosynthesis than eastern redbud.

Taxon
mexican redbude0
Material
C. canadensis var. mexicanae0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
eastern redbude0

Verbatim

e0

“mexican redbud [ C. canadensis var. mexicana (Rose) M. Hopkins] exhibited greater Pn than eastern redbud ( C. canadensis var. canadensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis decreased similarly under water deficit in both ecotypes.

Taxon
redbudt0
Treatment
water deficit stresse0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both ecotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pn decreased at a similar rate under water deficit stress for both ecotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mexican redbud had greater instantaneous water use efficiency than eastern redbud.

Taxon
Mexican redbude0
Outcome
instantaneous water use efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
eastern redbude0

Verbatim

e0

“Mexican redbud also had greater instantaneous water use efficiency [net photosynthesis: transpiration (WUE)] than eastern redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The photosynthetic optimum was 37 °C and did not vary by irrigation or ecotype.

Taxon
redbudt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
optimum temperature for potential photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
unaffectede0
Value
37 °Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“optimum temperature for potential photosynthetic capacity (37 °C) was unaffected by irrigation or ecotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eastern redbud had more negative osmotic potential at full turgor.

Taxon
eastern redbude0
Outcome
Tissue osmotic potential at full turgore0
Direction
more negativee0

Verbatim

e0

“Tissue osmotic potential at full turgor was more negative in eastern redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought did not affect osmotic potential in either redbud ecotype.

Taxon
redbudt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
unaffectede0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“was unaffected by drought stress in either ecotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eastern redbud had higher soluble carbohydrate content.

Taxon
eastern redbude0
Outcome
Soluble carbohydrate contente0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble carbohydrate content was higher in eastern redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–895 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D-pinitol was the major soluble carbohydrate in both ecotypes.

Taxon
redbudt0
Outcome
d -pinitol was the major soluble carbohydratee0
Qualifier
both ecotypese0

Verbatim

e0

“in both ecotypes, d -pinitol was the major soluble carbohydrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D-pinitol was more abundant in water-stressed redbud plants.

Taxon
redbudt0
Treatment
water-stressede0
Outcome
d -pinitole0
Direction
considerably more abundante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“d -pinitol was the major soluble carbohydrate and was considerably more abundant in the water-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total polyol content was greater in water-stressed redbud plants.

Taxon
redbudt0
Treatment
water-stressede0
Outcome
Total polyol contente0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total polyol content (myo-inositol + ononitol + pinitol) was also greater in the water-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Redbud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑