Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of NPS compost and foliar spray of humic acid on yield and uptake of nutrients by brinjal

SR Sontakke; DV Mali; SD Jadhao; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Effect of NPS compost and foliar spray of humic acid on yield and uptake of nutrients by brinjal” was conducted at Research farm, Department of Vegetable Science, Dr. PDKV, Akola during kharif season of 2023-2024. The objective of the experiment was to study the effect of NPS compost and foliar spray of humic acid on yield and nutrient uptake by brinjal. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with 9 treatments and 3 replications. The treatments comprised of foliar sprays of humic acid of concentration 0.5, 1 and 1.5% in combination with FYM and NPS compost along with the recommended dose of fertilizer. Among all treatments, T9 (100% RDF+ NPS compost @ 2.5 t ha-1+ 4 sprays of humic acid @1.5%) was found to give superior results. Significantly highest yield (fruit and straw yield) and nutrient uptake by plant was recorded with the application of this treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal fruit and straw yield were significantly highest with T9 (100% RDF + NPS compost 2.5 t ha-1 + 4 sprays of 1.5% humic acid) among all treatments.

Treatment
T9 (100% RDF+ NPS compost @ 2.5 t ha-1+ 4 sprays of humic acid @1.5%)e0
Outcome
yield (fruit and straw yield)e1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments, T9 (100% RDF+ NPS compost @ 2.5 t ha-1+ 4 sprays of humic acid @1.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly highest yield (fruit and straw yield) and nutrient uptake by plant was recorded with the application of this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake by brinjal plants was significantly highest with T9 among all treatments.

Treatment
T9 (100% RDF+ NPS compost @ 2.5 t ha-1+ 4 sprays of humic acid @1.5%)e0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by plante1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments, T9 (100% RDF+ NPS compost @ 2.5 t ha-1+ 4 sprays of humic acid @1.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly highest yield (fruit and straw yield) and nutrient uptake by plant was recorded with the application of this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

other · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 74 positive, 3 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 194 positive, 25 negative or no effect

193 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.