Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

The moisture regimes and herbicides efficacy in improving productivity and profitability of spring-planted maize

Munny Chinyo; Tej Pratap; Shailendra Pratap Singh; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during spring 2022 and 2023 to evaluate the impact of moisture regime and herbicide efficacy in maize (Zea mays L.). The experiment followed a split-plot design, with the main plots divided into two irrigation levels, viz. IW/CPE 0.8 and IW/CPE 1.2. Within each main plot, eight weed management treatments were tested, including atrazine 1000 g/ha, tembotrione 120 g/ha, topramezone 25.2 g/ha, atrazine 1000 g/ha fb hand-weeding at 35 DAS, atrazine 1000 g/ha fb tembotrione 120 g/ha, atrazine 1000 g/ha fb topramezone 25.2 g/ha, weed-free, and weedy check. Each treatment was replicated thrice in subplots. Interaction between irrigation levels and weed control practices revealed that spring maize irrigated at 1.2 IW: CPE in combinations with atrazine 1000 g/ha fb topramezone 25.2 g/ha produced significantly higher grain yield than other treatments. The economic analysis revealed that irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE ratio recorded significantly higher net returns of ₹ 66207/ha and B:C (2.47). Among weed management treatments, atrazine 1000 g/hafb topramezone 25.2 g/ha attained a maximum net income of ₹ 71661/ha with B:C (2.61) and next best was atrazine 1000 g/hafb tembotrione 120 g/ha which fetched next highest net income (₹ 65767/ha) and B:C (2.49).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE with atrazine followed by topramezone gave significantly higher grain yield than other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
1.2 IW: CPE in combinations with atrazine 1000 g/ha fb topramezone 25.2 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize irrigated at 1.2 IW: CPE in combinations with atrazine 1000 g/ha fb topramezone 25.2 g/ha produced significantly higher grain yield than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE yielded significantly higher net returns of ₹ 66207/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE ratioe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹ 66207/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE ratio recorded significantly higher net returns of ₹ 66207/ha and B:C (2.47).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE yielded a B:C ratio of 2.47.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE ratioe0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Value
2.47e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at 1.2 IW:CPE ratio recorded significantly higher net returns of ₹ 66207/ha and B:C (2.47).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by topramezone produced maximum net income of ₹ 71661/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1000 g/hafb topramezone 25.2 g/hae0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
₹ 71661/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine 1000 g/hafb topramezone 25.2 g/ha attained a maximum net income of ₹ 71661/ha with B:C (2.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by topramezone produced a B:C ratio of 2.61.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1000 g/hafb topramezone 25.2 g/hae0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Value
2.61e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine 1000 g/hafb topramezone 25.2 g/ha attained a maximum net income of ₹ 71661/ha with B:C (2.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by tembotrione produced the next highest net income, ₹ 65767/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1000 g/hafb tembotrione 120 g/hae0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
next higheste0
Value
₹ 65767/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine 1000 g/hafb tembotrione 120 g/ha which fetched next highest net income (₹ 65767/ha) and B:C (2.49).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by tembotrione produced a B:C ratio of 2.49.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1000 g/hafb tembotrione 120 g/hae0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Value
2.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine 1000 g/hafb tembotrione 120 g/ha which fetched next highest net income (₹ 65767/ha) and B:C (2.49).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

topramezone · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

tembotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 68 positive, 5 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.