Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Evaluating the impact of PGPR and humic Acid on soil properties and productivity of pea ( Pisum sativum )

F. Lalkhumliana; Rajesh Kaushal; S. Ananthakrishnan; et al.

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Humic Acid (HA) on soil properties, microbial activity, and the growth and yield of pea plants over two years (2021-2023). Eight treatments were tested, combining various recommended doses of nutrients (RDN), PGPR, and HA. Soil properties were measured before and after the experiment to assess changes over time. Significant improvements in soil fertility were observed, particularly in treatments T4 [75% RDN + PGPR 1 + HA foliar and soil application] and T7 [75% RDN + PGPR 2 + HA foliar and soil application]. T7 recorded the highest increases in available nitrogen (527 kg ha−1), phosphorus (110 kg ha−1), and potassium (431 kg ha−1). Microbial biomass carbon was also highest in T7 (63.2 µg g−1 soil), indicating enhanced microbial activity. Enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, phosphatase) were significantly elevated in T7, reflecting improved biochemical soil health. Agronomic parameters such as plant height, number of branches, and pod yield were also significantly higher in T4 and T7. T7 achieved the maximum plant height (91.7 cm), number of branches (14.6), and pod yield (84.2 q ha−1). The study concludes that integrating PGPR and HA with reduced chemical inputs can substantially improve soil fertility, microbial functions, and pea productivity. These findings highlight the potential of PGPR and HA as effective bioformulations for promoting sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 (75% recommended nutrient dose plus PGPR 1 plus foliar and soil humic acid) significantly improved soil fertility in pea.

Treatment
75% RDN + PGPR 1 + HA foliar and soil applicatione0
Interactor
PGPR 1e0symbiont
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant improvements in soil fertility were observed, particularly in treatments T4 [75% RDN + PGPR 1 + HA foliar and soil application] and T7 [75% RDN + PGPR 2 + HA foliar and soil application]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 (75% recommended nutrient dose plus PGPR 2 plus foliar and soil humic acid) significantly improved soil fertility in pea.

Treatment
75% RDN + PGPR 2 + HA foliar and soil applicatione0
Interactor
PGPR 2e0symbiont
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant improvements in soil fertility were observed, particularly in treatments T4 [75% RDN + PGPR 1 + HA foliar and soil application] and T7 [75% RDN + PGPR 2 + HA foliar and soil application]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 recorded the highest increase in available nitrogen (527 kg ha−1) in the pea trial.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
available nitrogene1
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
527 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“T7 recorded the highest increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“available nitrogen (527 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 recorded the highest increase in available phosphorus (110 kg ha−1) in the pea trial.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
phosphoruse1
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
110 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“T7 recorded the highest increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphorus (110 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 recorded the highest increase in available potassium (431 kg ha−1) in the pea trial.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
431 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“T7 recorded the highest increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“potassium (431 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial biomass carbon was highest in T7 at 63.2 µg g−1 soil, indicating enhanced microbial activity.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
Microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
higheste0
Value
63.2 µg g−1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Microbial biomass carbon was also highest in T7 (63.2 µg g−1 soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydrogenase, urease and phosphatase activities were significantly elevated in T7.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
Enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, phosphatase)e0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, phosphatase) were significantly elevated in T7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, number of branches and pod yield were significantly higher in T4.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches, and pod yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agronomic parameters such as plant height, number of branches, and pod yield were also significantly higher in T4 and T7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 achieved the maximum plant height of 91.7 cm.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
91.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“T7 achieved the maximum plant height (91.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 achieved the maximum number of branches, 14.6.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
number of branchese1
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.6e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“T7 achieved the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of branches (14.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 achieved the maximum pod yield, 84.2 q ha−1.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
maximume0
Value
84.2 q ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea ( Pisum sativum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“T7 achieved the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“pod yield (84.2 q ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1191 · show in text ↑

other · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.