Paper · 2025 · Plant Biotechnology Journal

Screening and mechanistic analysis of soybean varieties resistant to stay‐green syndrome caused by the soybean stay‐green‐associated virus

Hao Ai; Ruixiang Cheng; Rong Yan; et al.

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Soybean, one of the world's most economically significant crops, contributes 25% of global edible oil production and provides two-thirds of the concentrated protein for livestock feed. However, in recent years, the emergence of soybean stay-green syndrome (SGS), or ‘zhengqing’, in the Huang-Huai-Hai region of China, has become a major threat to soybean production. This syndrome has led to severe yield losses, with some areas reporting complete crop failure (Li et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2019). The issue is expanding and has become a prominent concern across China (Cheng et al., 2023; He et al., 2025; Xu et al., 2019). SGS is characterized by delayed senescence at harvest, with soybean leaves remaining green, pods failing to form, and seed development stalling, leading to few or flat pods (Cheng et al., 2022; Li et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2023). The profound impact of this syndrome on both yield and quality presents a significant challenge for the soybean industry in China. Recently, our research has identified the aetiology of SGS as a novel geminivirus, named soybean stay-green-associated geminivirus (SoSGV). Through Koch's postulates, we have demonstrated for the first time that SoSGV causes the stay-green symptoms in soybeans (Cheng et al., 2022). SoSGV is a monopartite, single-strand DNA virus, likely resulting from intergeneric recombination of geminiviruses (Cheng et al., 2022). Furthermore, we have identified the common brown leafhopper (Orosius orientalis) as the transmission vector of SoSGV (Cheng et al., 2023). Previous reports have indicated that SGS presents diverse phenotypic expressions in the field, with variations in symptom severity (Cheng et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2019). However, the causes of this variability are unclear, and it is uncertain whether differences in symptom expression are linked to SoSGV infection across various soybean cultivars. Breeding for host-plant resistance is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly strategy to enhance crop yield. However, progress in identifying SoSGV-resistant soybean varieties has been limited. In this study, we utilized a vector-transmitted inoculation system developed in our laboratory to assess SoSGV resistance in 36 elite soybean germplasm from the Huang-Huai-Hai region (Table S1). Our findings revealed that the majority of these varieties were highly susceptible to SoSGV. To determine whether SoSGV induces stay-green symptoms at maturity, sixteen soybean varieties infected with SoSGV and mock controls were transplanted to the field one month after inoculation. These varieties, selected for their relatively weak phenotypes during early-stage SoSGV infection, were monitored from July to October (2022–2024). All mock-treated plants exhibited yellowing and mature seeds, while 15 of the 16 varieties, except Fudou_18, showed delayed leaf senescence and flattened pods (Figure 1a,b). Ten varieties (Jiadou_2, Jidou_12, Xiangfeng_4, Andou_203, Huadou_19, Lindou_11, Xudou_20, Shengdi_1, Lindou_10, and Zhonghuang_13) exhibited dwarfing at maturity. The remaining five varieties (Wandou_38, Tianyikedou_18, Hedou_12, Huaidou_11, and Shidou_1) showed no significant changes in plant height (Figure 1a; Figure S2a). Pod number was reduced in most dwarf varieties, except Xudou_20 (Figure 1b; Figure S2b). In Xudou_20 and Shidou_1, pod number was unaffected, but pod filling was severely reduced, with over 80% flat pods (Figure S2c). These results suggested that phenotypic variation among soybean varieties manifested upon SoSGV infection. To assess the impact of SoSGV infection on yield, we analyzed infected soybean varieties and observed yield losses ranging from 15.8% to 97.05% (Figure 1b,c; Figure S3a). Among these varieties, ten exhibited severe yield reductions exceeding 80%, including Jiadou_2, Wandou_38, Tianyikedou_18, Jidou_12, Xiangfeng_4, Huadou_19, Lindou_11, Xudou_20, Lindou_10, and Zhonghuang_13 (Figure S3a). Interestingly, Huaidou_11 demonstrated the lowest yield loss (36.19%) despite displaying evident stay-green symptoms (Figure 1a). This relatively low yield loss aligns with our observation that SoSGV infection did not significantly affect the total pod number or flat pod rate in Huaidou_11 (Figure S3b). However, infected Huaidou_11 produced more abnormal seeds, marked by smaller size, altered shape and incomplete maturation, severely reducing seed quality (Figure 1b; Figure S3b). Fudou_18 exhibited remarkable tolerance to SoSGV infection, as reflected in its mild symptom severity (Figure 1c; Figure S1). While plants showed symptoms such as leaf curling and dwarfing during the early stages of infection (Figure S1), only mild stay-green symptoms were observed at maturity, with no significant difference in plant height or pod maturation compared to the mock treatment (Figure 1c, Figure S1b). SoSGV infection did not significantly affect the total pod number or flat pod rate in Fudou_18 (Figure 1c). Despite a slight reduction in mean seed width from 7.705 mm to 6.872 mm (Figure 1c), the 100-grain weight decreased by only 18%. Total yield per plant was reduced by approximately 15.8% a relatively minor impact compared to other varieties that experienced greater yield losses (Figure 1c). Furthermore, the seeds of SoSGV-infected Fudou_18 maintained a uniform shape, consistent with those from the control (Figure 1c). To explore whether the mild symptoms observed in Fudou_18 were associated with lower virus titre, we performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction using infected leaves to quantify SoSGV accumulation at the R5 stage in Zhonghuang_13, Huaidou_11, Wandou_38, and Fudou_18. The results indicated that SoSGV accumulation was lowest in Fudou_18 compared to the other three cultivars (Figure 1d), suggesting that Fudou_18 exhibits resistance to SoSGV infection, potentially through mechanisms that restrict virus accumulation. Next, to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance of Fudou_18 to SoSGV, we performed transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses on Fudou_18 and two susceptible cultivars (Williams 82 and Zhonghuang 13) following SoSGV infection. Transcriptome analysis first revealed genes that were differentially expressed (DEGs) between infected versus mock-treated plants (Figure S4a; Table S2) with KEGG analysis revealing that metabolic genes (particularly for specialized metabolism) are significantly enriched (Figure S4b). We further conducted non-targeted metabolomics analysis on the same samples Fudou_18, Williams 82, and Zhonghuang 13 used for transcriptome analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated a clear separation in the global metabolic profiles among cultivars (Figure S4c). While SoSGV-infected Fudou_18 and the susceptible cultivars exhibited only a minor metabolome change compared to controls (Figure S4c). Differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) analysis revealed that there is a clear differentiation of metabolic profiles among the three cultivars and a large number of DAMs were significantly upregulated in Fudou_18 compared with the susceptible cultivars (Figure S4d; Table S3). Enrichment pathway analysis of DAGs identified that those significantly enriched KEGG pathways were involved in phenylpropanoid and starch and sucrose metabolism in Fudou_18 post-infection, indicating that phenolics and sugars might be subjected to metabolic reprogramming after SoSGV infection (Figure S4e,f). We further conducted a comparative analysis between Fudou_18 and the two susceptible cultivars by plotting significant differences versus fold changes of each mass feature (Figure 1e). Notably, kaempferol glucoside (m/z 595.16 @6.4 and 6.7 min, respectively) and apigenin glucoside (m/z 741.22 @5.4 min) were highly accumulated in Fudou_18, less accumulated in Williams 82 and merely accumulated in Zhonghuang 13 (Figure 1e,f), a pattern highly consistent with SoSGV resistance of the three cultivars. To validate the role of flavonoid/isoflavonoid pathways in Fudou_18 resistance to SoSGV, chalcone synthase 1 (CHS1, Glyma.19G105100 and Glyma.06G118550), a key enzyme in this pathway, was silenced using apple latent spherical virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). Silencing CHS1 expression in Fudou_18 significantly compromised plant resistance to SoSGV, as evidenced by increased SoSGV DNA and coat protein (CP) accumulations, along with severe plant dwarfing at both early and late stages of infection (Figure S5). Moreover, silencing CHS1 expression also increased the flat pod rate following SoSGV infection compared to the control (Figure S5f). We also used a soybean line that stably overexpressing soybean isoflavone synthase 2 (IFS2), a key enzyme involved in isoflavone accumulation (Jung et al., 2000). After SoSGV inoculation, overexpression of IFS2 in soybean cultivar ‘Jack’ significantly enhanced plant resistance to SoSGV compared to ‘Jack’ control plants, as evidenced by decreased SoSGV DNA and CP accumulations (Figure S6). These findings highlight the pivotal role of the flavonoid/isoflavonoid pathway in soybean resistance to SoSGV. Collectively, through large-scale screening, Fudou_18 as a SoSGV-tolerant variety. Elucidating its resistance mechanisms lays a promising foundation for developing soybean cultivars with enhanced resistance to this critical viral disease. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2602000), Biological Breeding-National Science and Technology Major Project 2030 (2023ZD04037), and the Outstanding Youth Fund of Jiangsu Province (BK20231534). The author(s) declare that they have no conflict of interest. H.A., R.C., Y.R., Y.W., K.X., W.Y., W.Y., H.C., and D.Y. performed experiments and analysed the data. Y.X., D.L., Z.L., and X.T. designed the project. Y.X., Z.L., and D.L. supervised the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the manuscript. The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article. The raw transcriptome sequencing data have been deposited in the China National GeneBank (CNGB) under accession number PRJCA039705. Figure S1-S6 Supplementary Figures. Table S1-S4 Supplementary Tables. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most of 36 elite soybean germplasm were highly susceptible to SoSGV.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
these varietiese0
Interactor
SoSGVe0pathogen
Outcome
susceptible to SoSGVe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“majority of these varieties were highly susceptible to SoSGV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2357–2417 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen of sixteen infected varieties had delayed leaf senescence and flattened pods compared with mock controls.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
16 varietiese0
Outcome
delayed leaf senescence and flattened podse0
Value
15 of the 16 varietiese0
Comparator
mock-treated plantse0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All mock-treated plants exhibited yellowing and mature seeds, while 15 of the 16 varieties, except Fudou_18, showed delayed leaf senescence and flattened pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2759–2917 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten listed varieties showed dwarfing at maturity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
dwarfing at maturitye0
Value
Ten varietiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ten varieties (Jiadou_2, Jidou_12, Xiangfeng_4, Andou_203, Huadou_19, Lindou_11, Xudou_20, Shengdi_1, Lindou_10, and Zhonghuang_13) exhibited dwarfing at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2933–3095 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five other varieties showed no significant plant-height change.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no significant changese0
Value
five varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“remaining five varieties (Wandou_38, Tianyikedou_18, Hedou_12, Huaidou_11, and Shidou_1) showed no significant changes in plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3101–3235 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod number fell in most dwarf varieties except Xudou_20.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Pod numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
except Xudou_20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pod number was reduced in most dwarf varieties, except Xudou_20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3261–3324 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xudou_20 and Shidou_1 had more than 80% flat pods, despite unaffected pod number.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Xudou_20 and Shidou_1e0
Outcome
flat podse0
Direction
overe0
Value
over 80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Xudou_20 and Shidou_1, pod number was unaffected, but pod filling was severely reduced, with over 80% flat pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3350–3464 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SoSGV infection caused soybean yield losses of 15.8% to 97.05%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
15.8% to 97.05%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield losses ranging from 15.8% to 97.05%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3688–3729 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten varieties lost more than 80% yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
exceeding 80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ten exhibited severe yield reductions exceeding 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3780–3831 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Huaidou_11 had a 36.19% yield loss despite stay-green symptoms.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Huaidou_11e0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
36.19%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Huaidou_11 demonstrated the lowest yield loss (36.19%) despite displaying evident stay-green symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3993–4094 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected Huaidou_11 produced more abnormal seeds with reduced quality.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Huaidou_11e0
Outcome
abnormal seedse0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infected Huaidou_11 produced more abnormal seeds, marked by smaller size, altered shape and incomplete maturation, severely reducing seed quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4292–4437 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fudou_18 showed mild stay-green symptoms at maturity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
mild stay-green symptomse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only mild stay-green symptoms were observed at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4702–4757 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SoSGV did not significantly affect Fudou_18 pod number or flat-pod rate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Fudou_18e0
Treatment
SoSGV infectione0
Interactor
SoSGVe0pathogen
Outcome
total pod number or flat pod ratee0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SoSGV infection did not significantly affect the total pod number or flat pod rate in Fudou_18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4880–4974 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fudou_18 seed width fell from 7.705 to 6.872 mm.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
mean seed widthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
7.705 mm to 6.872 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction in mean seed width from 7.705 mm to 6.872 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5005–5059 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fudou_18 100-grain weight fell by 18%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
100-grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100-grain weight decreased by only 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5077–5115 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fudou_18 yield per plant fell approximately 15.8%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Total yield per plante0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 15.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield per plant was reduced by approximately 15.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5117–5173 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SoSGV accumulation was lowest in Fudou_18 among four cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Fudou_18e0
Interactor
SoSGVe0pathogen
Outcome
SoSGV accumulatione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
other three cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SoSGV accumulation was lowest in Fudou_18 compared to the other three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5710–5789 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolic genes were significantly enriched among infection-responsive genes.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Gene
metabolic genese0
Outcome
significantly enrichede0
Direction
enrichede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metabolic genes (particularly for specialized metabolism) are significantly enriched”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6366–6450 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaempferol and apigenin glucosides accumulated highly in Fudou_18 relative to susceptible cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Fudou_18e0
Outcome
kaempferol glucosidee0
Direction
highly accumulatede0
Comparator
Williams 82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kaempferol glucoside (m/z 595.16 @6.4 and 6.7 min, respectively) and apigenin glucoside (m/z 741.22 @5.4 min) were highly accumulated in Fudou_18, less accumulated in Williams 82 and merely accumulated in Zhonghuang 13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7670–7888 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CHS1 silencing compromised resistance, increased viral accumulation and dwarfing, and increased flat-pod rate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Fudou_18e0
Treatment
Silencing CHS1 expressione0
Interactor
SoSGVe0pathogen
Gene
CHS1e0
Outcome
plant resistance to SoSGVe0
Direction
compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silencing CHS1 expression in Fudou_18 significantly compromised plant resistance to SoSGV, as evidenced by increased SoSGV DNA and coat protein (CP) accumulations, along with severe plant dwarfing at both early and late stages of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8241–8480 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean varieties resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IFS2 overexpression enhanced Jack resistance to SoSGV and reduced viral DNA and CP accumulation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Jacke0
Treatment
overexpression of IFS2e0
Interactor
SoSGVe0pathogen
Gene
IFS2e0
Outcome
plant resistance to SoSGVe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
‘Jack’ control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overexpression of IFS2 in soybean cultivar ‘Jack’ significantly enhanced plant resistance to SoSGV compared to ‘Jack’ control plants, as evidenced by decreased SoSGV DNA and CP accumulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8815–9005 · show in text ↑

infection · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

51 papers: 9 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

loss of function · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 17 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.