Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences

The effects of pruning time on attributes of phenology yield and quality in some table grapes cultivars

Mustafa Çelik; Hasan Çiftçi

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the effects of winter pruning time (early and late winter pruning) on the phenology, yield, and quality of cvs. Samancı Seedless and Alphonse Lavallée (Vitis vinifera L.). This research was planned in a completely randomised design with three replications. Winter pruning was performed when the upper buds were on canes at the dormant stage (BBCH 00) and the 2-leaf stage (BBCH 12). Bursting of bottom buds on canes was delayed as 6 days for cv. Samancı Seedless and 5 days for cv. Alphonse Lavallée when compared to control. However, maturation time and veraison time were not affected. Additionally, the yield and quality of early- and late-pruned vines did not show significant differences. It was recommended that late winter pruning could be performed when the upper buds were at the 2-leaf stage (BBCH 12) to prevent late spring frost damage for both cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late winter pruning delayed bottom budburst by 6 days in Samancı Seedless.

Taxon
table grapes cultivarst0
Material
Samancı Seedlesse0
Treatment
late winter pruninge1
Outcome
Bursting of bottom buds on canese0
Direction
delayede0
Value
6 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Bursting of bottom buds on canes was delayed as 6 days for cv. Samancı Seedless and 5 days for cv. Alphonse Lavallée when compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“late winter pruning could be performed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“table grapes cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late winter pruning delayed bottom budburst by 5 days in Alphonse Lavallée.

Taxon
table grapes cultivarst0
Material
Alphonse Lavalléee0
Treatment
late winter pruninge1
Outcome
Bursting of bottom buds on canese0
Direction
delayede0
Value
5 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Bursting of bottom buds on canes was delayed as 6 days for cv. Samancı Seedless and 5 days for cv. Alphonse Lavallée when compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“late winter pruning could be performed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“table grapes cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning time did not affect maturation or veraison time.

Taxon
table grapes cultivarst0
Treatment
pruning timee1
Outcome
maturation time and veraison timee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, maturation time and veraison time were not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–620 · show in text ↑
e1

“pruning time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
t0

“table grapes cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and quality did not significantly differ between early- and late-pruned vines.

Taxon
table grapes cultivarst0
Treatment
late-pruned vinese0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0
Direction
did not show significant differencese0
Comparator
early-e0

Verbatim

e0

“the yield and quality of early- and late-pruned vines did not show significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“table grapes cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend late pruning at the two-leaf stage to prevent late spring frost damage.

Taxon
table grapes cultivarst0
Outcome
late winter pruning could be performed when the upper buds were at the 2-leaf stage (BBCH 12)e0

Verbatim

e0

“It was recommended that late winter pruning could be performed when the upper buds were at the 2-leaf stage (BBCH 12) to prevent late spring frost damage for both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“table grapes cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑

pruning · phenology · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.